Glucose

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-08-2005
Thinking

Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 20
wildsunflower2 is an unknown quantity at this point
Glucose

I can't understand my book when trying to answer "Why is no glucose produced if a plant is kept in the dark, even though the sugar producing reactions are called light-dependent?"

I think it has something to do with C3 cycle but I'm not sure. Any help would be appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-08-2005
Creating
Hypography Staff Member
Administrator
Editor

Join Date: May 2005
Location: Silver Spring, MD, USA
Posts: 4,492
CraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Glucose

Quote:
Originally Posted by wildsunflower2
... "Why is no glucose produced if a plant is kept in the dark, even though the sugar producing reactions are called light-dependent?"...
Purely from the word meaning of the sentence, I get that
  • sugar producing reactions are called light-dependent (require light)
  • a plant is kept in the dark (gets no light)
It follows directly that if a plant requires light to produce sugar, but gets no light, it will produce no sugar, glucose or any other form. (from an introductory biology text, we get that the only form of sugar produced by photosynthesis is glucose, but that knowledge isn’t necessary for this question)

The question answers itself – it is a tautology, presented as a question. It should read: “No glucose is produced by a plant kept in the dark because the sugar-producing reactions are light-dependent”.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-09-2005
Thinking

Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 20
wildsunflower2 is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Glucose

Well that's what I thought but the answer to the question seemed so obvious to me that I thought I was missing something. Thanks for your help! It's highly appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-09-2005
UncleAl's Avatar
Creating

Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 1,042
UncleAl is a glorious beacon of lightUncleAl is a glorious beacon of lightUncleAl is a glorious beacon of lightUncleAl is a glorious beacon of lightUncleAl is a glorious beacon of lightUncleAl is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Glucose

Participants in a course of instruction generally group into three categories:

1) Instructors.
2) Those who pass.
3) Those who fail.

Failure is a vital process, especially in bonehead and freshman courses. Failure weeds out the stupid, the incompetent, the dysfunctional, the lazy, the mis-assigned... those who would do better to pursue something they can do than something they cannot do, and as soon as possible. Think of it as evolution in action.

Elitism insists the better is preferable to the worse. Uncle Al is an elitist. Government is the antithesis of elitism, as in 320,000 debit cards for $2000 each issued to hurricane Katrina VICTIMS. That's $640 million of taxpayer money shot to crap in a single gulp. What is the total tuition paid at American universities each year for every math, science, engineering, and computer major? Those people will be valuable.

Save the drama for your mama. Get down and push or get out, maggot.
__________________
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-09-2005
Thinking

Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 20
wildsunflower2 is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Glucose

Some of your posts seem so harsh. Not too sure if they are intended that way but for those of us who are trying to understand the basic science feel intimidated to post again.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-09-2005
Buffy's Avatar
Resident Slayer
Hypography Staff Member
Administrator
3D Championship Golf Champion!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sunnydale, CA
Posts: 6,657
Buffy has a reputation beyond reputeBuffy has a reputation beyond reputeBuffy has a reputation beyond reputeBuffy has a reputation beyond reputeBuffy has a reputation beyond reputeBuffy has a reputation beyond reputeBuffy has a reputation beyond reputeBuffy has a reputation beyond reputeBuffy has a reputation beyond reputeBuffy has a reputation beyond reputeBuffy has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Glucose

Quote:
Originally Posted by wildsunflower2
Some of your posts seem so harsh. Not too sure if they are intended that way but for those of us who are trying to understand the basic science feel intimidated to post again.
We probably ought to include a warning about The Uncle in our FAQ. We keep him around because he's insanely smart, although his delivery is, um, "theatrical"... Think of Count Olaf in "A Series of Unfortunate Events" except he's not as larcenous. Take what you get from him and ignore what you don't like. We all end up learning from him. We do slap him around in public if he gets too out of line, but there's only so much you can do about a crazy uncle.

Test-of-faith,
Aunt Buffy
__________________
"If you do not agree with anything I say, I'll not only retract it, but deny under oath that I ever said it!"
__________________________________________________ ______________-- Tom Lehrer

"The shrinks diagnosed me a sociopath with paranoid delusions. But they’re just out to get me cause I threatened to kill them."


Forum Administrator
Hypography Science Forums - Science for Boys and Girls! Its not for nothing that we hang out here.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09-09-2005
Thinking

Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 20
wildsunflower2 is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Glucose

Thanks for the explaination of the "Crazy Uncle". Won't take his critizism to heart!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Tiniest Test Kits: A Medical Future for Carbon Nanotubes? C1ay Technology News 0 05-26-2005
Mouse with designer liver has enhanced glucose tolerance C1ay Medical Science News 0 04-12-2005
Information/Complexity: bacterium vs. Windows OS TeleMad Computer Science 21 09-22-2004

» Current Poll
Favorite James Bond?
Sean Connery - 63.64%
7 Votes
George Lazenby - 0%
0 Votes
David Niven - 9.09%
1 Vote
Roger Moore - 9.09%
1 Vote
Timothy Dalton - 9.09%
1 Vote
Pierce Brosnan - 0%
0 Votes
Daniel Craig - 9.09%
1 Vote
Hate 'em all - 0%
0 Votes
Who's James Bond? - 0%
0 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2000-2008 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network