From CNN:
Climate report leaves U.S. policy unchanged
"President Bush is holding fast to his rejection of mandatory curbs on greenhouse gases that are blamed for global warming, despite a fresh report from 300 scientists in the United States and seven other nations that shows Arctic temperatures are rising."
This bit sort of pisses me off (pardon my French):
Quote:
|
"President Bush strongly opposes any treaty or policy that would cause the loss of a single American job, let alone the nearly 5 million jobs Kyoto would have cost," said James Connaughton, chairman of the White House Council on Environmental Quality.
|
Scientists have shown that there are two main things which influence the observed global warming: 1) The sun is hotter than in 8,000 years and 2) The atmosphere is full of man-made Carbon Dioxide and other pollutants like Nitrogen Oxides. The first is not influenced by human presence, but the other certainly is. Yet the opponents of the Kyoto protocol argue that we cannot prove beyond a doubt whether the global warming will not recede next year.
Wouldn't it make more sense to assume it will NOT recede? Global temperatures have climbed steadily for decades and are climbing still.
It seems the policy is to make sure we have jobs now. It doesn't matter if 100 million jobs (not to mention lives) are lost in 100 years from now because we don't live then. What a marvellous way to waste the world.
Someone wants the US to leave the UN. Fine. The 289 million US citizens are more important than the rmaining 5,7 billion people on Earth. Should we also move the US off the planet? Perhaps to Mars?