Go Back   Science Forums > General Science Forums > Economics
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-06-2008   #21 (permalink)
Biochemist's Avatar
Eccentric Heretic


Location:
Portland, OR
 
Biochemist is infamous around these partsBiochemist is infamous around these partsBiochemist is infamous around these parts
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Economics

Quote:
Originally Posted by nutronjon View Post
Let us really pay attention to WWII without oil...
Let us pretend oil was never discovered. Take out of WWII everything dependent on oil. What does that war look like now?
I am still note really sure what you are driving toward on this, Nutro. Oil was a driver because it was a convenient, inexpensive source of fuel. There are others before and since (e.g., coal before, nuclear power since). In any war, advances in technology (including fuel technology) typically advantage all participants. WWII would indeed have had a different character without oil (particularly in terms of air power). But the political issues (German hegemony, Japaneses imperialism, etc) still existed and were driving toward a confrontation that the US was likely to engage.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nutro
If there had been no oil in the world, Japan would not have bombed the US.
Huh? The Japanese had already advanced on major portions of China, Southeast Asia, Korea and the South Pacific before they bombed Pearl Harbor. Are you suggesting that all of this was about their thirst for oil, or just their attack on the US?


----------------
Few problems are so complex that they cannot be substantially clarified by one more cup of coffee (or a nice cabernet if it is after 5:00)

Moderator in absentia. Return anticipated. Timing somewhat vague.
Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2008   #22 (permalink)
Michaelangelica's Avatar
Creating

Editor
Basic Subscription
Sponsor

Location:
North of Sydney Australia
 
Michaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Economics

Quote:
Originally Posted by nutronjon View Post
Let us really pay attention to WWII without oil...
Let us pretend oil was never discovered. Take out of WWII everything dependent on oil. What does that war look like now?
The Germans mainly used coal using the Fischer-Tropsch process.
Borensen says somewhere else here that SA runs on this now.
Australia has masses of coal, so too has SA (?)

Making oil from Gopher Weed was supposed to be economic at $65 a barrel ( somewhere on these forums I learnt that)
What happened to that idea?
Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2008   #23 (permalink)
Mike C's Avatar
Explaining


Location:
Mertropolitin Detroit MI US
 
Mike C is infamous around these partsMike C is infamous around these parts
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Economics

To All

I would like to clarify what I said earlier on this topic.

With our involvement in the New World Order, our economy (US) is now sliding down into a depression.
Reason?
The billionaire population is exploding by the hundreds and will be increasing over time.
Our workers are being forced to accept reductions in healthcare benifits and pension and wage cuts that means reduced buying power.

So while the upper level incomes are inflating and the lower incomes shrinking, this reduced buying power means there will be less cars, houses and other such tangible goods to be sold.

So this spread of wealth is increasing to where our economy is now slowing down into a depression.

So, I think those billionaires ought to start paying higher taxes on their UNneeded surplus income and start buying cars and houses by the hundreds to create more jobs.
Those Chinese workers are not going to buy our cars and houses, thats for sure.

Mike C
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Economics business.The Sub-prime Crisis. How bad is it? Michaelangelica Economics 210 09-19-2009 04:46 PM
Big Mac Index (our first Economics thread!) Buffy Political sciences 5 10-09-2008 06:28 PM
Economics and free market HydrogenBond Economics 179 01-05-2008 08:21 AM
Criminal Justice Economics - A dialogue InfiniteNow Political sciences 0 09-19-2006 02:16 PM
Supply side economics and tax policy Biochemist Political sciences 49 07-07-2005 09:08 AM

» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 27.27%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 45.45%
5 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 27.27%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:52 PM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network