Quote:
Originally Posted by nutronjon
Let us really pay attention to WWII without oil...
Let us pretend oil was never discovered. Take out of WWII everything dependent on oil. What does that war look like now?
|
I am still note really sure what you are driving toward on this, Nutro. Oil was a driver because it was a convenient, inexpensive source of fuel. There are others before and since (e.g., coal before, nuclear power since). In any war, advances in technology (including fuel technology) typically advantage all participants. WWII would indeed have had a different character without oil (particularly in terms of air power). But the political issues (German hegemony, Japaneses imperialism, etc) still existed and were driving toward a confrontation that the US was likely to engage.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nutro
If there had been no oil in the world, Japan would not have bombed the US.
|
Huh? The Japanese had already advanced on major portions of China, Southeast Asia, Korea and the South Pacific before they bombed Pearl Harbor. Are you suggesting that all of this was about their thirst for oil, or just their attack on the US?
----------------
Few problems are so complex that they cannot be substantially clarified by one more cup of coffee

(or a nice cabernet if it is after 5:00)
Moderator in absentia. Return anticipated. Timing somewhat vague.