Physicists succeed in creating quark-gluon plasma

Comment
 
LinkBack Article Tools
Published by C1ay 03-15-2005
Scientists trying to recreate conditions that existed just a few millionths of a second after the big bang that started the universe have run into a mysterious problem – some of the reactions they are getting don't mesh with what they thought they were supposed to see.

Now, two University of Washington physicists have dusted off a quantum mechanics technique usually associated with low-energy physics and applied it to results from experiments at Brookhaven National Laboratory on New York's Long Island that produce high-energy collisions between gold nuclei. The result is data much more in line with what theorists expected from the experiments, said John Cramer, a UW physics professor. That means physicists at Brookhaven probably have actually succeeded in creating quark-gluon plasma, a state of matter that has not existed since a microsecond after the big bang that began the universe.

As it turns out, the model the physicists were using was missing some pieces, say Cramer and Gerald Miller, also a UW physics professor, whose findings will be published this month in Physical Review Letters, a journal of the American Physical Society. "We think we've solved the puzzle by identifying important phenomena that were left out of the model," Cramer said.

Since 2000, scientists have been using the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider at Brookhaven to collide gold nuclei with each other at nearly the speed of light. They are trying to get subatomic particles called quarks and gluons to separate from the nuclei and form a superheated quark-gluon plasma, 40 billion times hotter than room temperature.

Physicists used a technique called Hanbury Brown-Twiss Interferometry, originally used by astronomers to measure the size of stars, to learn the size and duration of a fireball produced in the collision of two gold nuclei. The technique focuses on momentum differences between pairs of pions, the particles produced in the fireball.

Before the collider experiment began, scientists expected a quark-gluon plasma to fuel a large and long-lasting fireball. Instead, the interferometry data showed a fireball similar in size and duration to those seen at much lower energies. Researchers also expected to see pions pushed out of the plasma gradually, but instead they seem to explode out all at once.

"We expected to bring the nuclear liquid to a boil and produce a steam of quark-gluon plasma," Cramer said. "Instead, the boiler seems to be blowing up in our faces."

While other evidence suggested that the collider experiment had created a quark-gluon plasma, the interferometry data pointed away from that possibility. To solve the puzzle, Cramer and Miller used a phenomenon called chiral symmetry restoration, which predicts that subatomic particles will change in mass and size depending on their environment – in a hot, dense plasma as opposed to a vacuum, for instance.

By adding that process to the model, they found that pions in the plasma have to expend a large amount of energy to escape, as if they were stuck in a deep hole and had to climb out. That is because chiral symmetry gives pions a low mass when they are inside the plasma but a much higher mass once outside. The scientists also allowed for some pions to disappear completely, to transform into some other type of particle as they emerge from the plasma.

The result reconciles all the evidence from the collider experiments, supporting the possibility that a quark-gluon plasma actually has been created.

"We have taken a quantum mechanics technique, called the nuclear optical model, from an old and dusty shelf and applied it to puzzling new physics results," Miller said. "It's really a scientific detective story."

The work, supported by U.S. Department of Energy grants, adds to the general understanding of what happened in the first microseconds after the big bang, he said, "and what we bring to bear is a better microscope, the microscope of quantum mechanics."

Cramer noted that adding chiral symmetry restoration to the picture achieved results very close to what computer models told scientists to expect, and did so without forcing the experimental data to fit preconceived standards.

"A microsecond after the big bang, there was a state of matter that no one was able to investigate until very recently," he said. "We are still learning, but our understanding is growing."

Source: University of Washington
  #1  
By Dark Mind on 03-15-2005
Re: Physicists succeed in creating quark-gluon plasma

That is astounding, I'm absolutely amazed we're so close to creating matter that only existed one micro-second after the big bang.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
By TeleMad on 03-25-2005
Re: Physicists succeed in creating quark-gluon plasma

This creation of a QGP may not have been the first. CERN scientists believed they created one before April 2000, and several lines of evidence that indicated they had.

Quote:
”CERN researchers cite several lines of evidence that strongly indicate they created the quark-gluon plasma.

First are the relative numbers of various hadrons, which indicate the temperature and energy density that must have prevailed when they formed. …

The next observed effect is enhancement of strangeness, which refers to a type of quark. …

All this evidence comes down on the side of a quark-gluon plasma. Why, then, in the words of Heinz, is this evidence “not enough to prove beyond reasonable doubt” that a quark-gluon plasma has been created? The problem is that the evidence is indirect, involving detection of particles produced when the plasma changes back to ordinary hadrons. … “ (Fireballs of Free Quarks, Graham P Collins, Scientific American, April 2000, p16-18)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
By C1ay on 03-25-2005
Re: Physicists succeed in creating quark-gluon plasma

Quote:
Originally Posted by TeleMad
This creation of a QGP may not have been the first. CERN scientists believed they created one before April 2000, and several lines of evidence that indicated they had.
Good point. I think the title on the news release could have been worded better. The article actually suggests that the news is more about their ability to actually confirm the creation of QGP directly compared against earlier methods. It suggests that they have probably created QGP before at lower levels but those earlier results were not what they expected to see at the time.
Reply With Quote
Comment

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Article: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Article Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

» Current Poll
Favorite James Bond?
Sean Connery - 70.00%
7 Votes
George Lazenby - 0%
0 Votes
David Niven - 10.00%
1 Vote
Roger Moore - 10.00%
1 Vote
Timothy Dalton - 0%
0 Votes
Pierce Brosnan - 0%
0 Votes
Daniel Craig - 10.00%
1 Vote
Hate 'em all - 0%
0 Votes
Who's James Bond? - 0%
0 Votes
Total Votes: 10
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2000-2008 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network
Powered by GARS © 2005-2008