Go Back   Science Forums > General topics > Introductions
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-05-2008   #11 (permalink)
HydrogenBond's Avatar
Creating


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: A Scientific Theory for Creation

Genesis is not talking about physical creation but is sort of a parable that is talking about human consciousness. This angle is the bridge between religion and science. The modern human mind, appeared 6-10K years ago, when human civilization began to appear.

Picture this scenario. We have the pre-humans who are more like advanced animals with some basic skills that took thousands of years to evolve. They are much more extroverted than introverted, reacting to reality in an instinctive, real time way. What begins to happen is a subjective perception of the world appears. For example, someone with a social anxiety disorder is reacting to subjective reality rather than to the actual hard data stemming from objective reality. This subjective change is symbolized by God brooding in the deep. The light that appears is the separation of a part of the human mind, i.e., ego, from the darkness of natural instinct. Civilization appears, since something advanced is now needed to reflect and help evolve this new capability.

The rest of genesis is more like a fast learning curve of awareness, where what had always been there buy not noticed becomes noticeable. An analogy is taking a course in botany. After the course, if one goes into the woods, what was once a bunch of trees now appears different. The same trees were always there, but one's perception changed allowing what was not noticed before to come into awareness with greater clarity.

The bible has Adam appearing as sort of a singular mutation. Adam goes back to sleep and Eve forms. It seems to imply that modern consciousness appears, as an isolated entity, but doesn't stabilize at first, i.e., Adam lonely in the garden and goes to sleep until a helpmate appears. The new human mind couldn't stabilize, at first, but went with the herd. But when Eve appears, there is an interactive rapport for forward stability.

A good analogy is going to the woods, after taking the botany course, but with people that have little interest. You may try to share but they could care less about it, so you blend in with the crowd and drink beer. But one day there is another person who also took botany. Now one is able to enjoy nature. One may even begin to explore and find new things. Once Adam and Eve both appear, then there is a quickening in evolution.
Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2008   #12 (permalink)
Rade's Avatar
Understanding


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: If zero probability creation events can occur, then Creationism might be true

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shubee View Post
...So why do quantum events happen?...
It seems to me that this question forms the basis for your discussion. Such events are not "without reason", there is good reason, however, unlike you, I do not see a need for "religion" to provide the explanation. I find the explanation in the most simple non contradictory statement of logical reasoning possible to a human mind--"because existence exits".
Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2008   #13 (permalink)
Rade's Avatar
Understanding


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: A Scientific Theory for Creation

Quote:
Originally Posted by HydrogenBond View Post
Genesis is not talking about physical creation but is sort of a parable that is talking about human consciousness...
But, see here for an alternative view:

The Natural History of Creation ... - Google Book Search
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Material Creation coldcreation Astronomy and Cosmology 110 12-13-2007 06:34 AM
Rethinking…Classification of Scientific Theory HIENVN Philosophy of Science 2 10-20-2006 12:52 PM
Creation and Evolution-- Final Theory questor Theology forum 0 10-15-2005 08:25 AM
Law of Creation Guadalupe Physics and Mathematics 13 10-09-2005 09:36 PM

» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 27.27%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 45.45%
5 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 27.27%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:18 PM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network