Go Back   Science Forums > General Science Forums > Linguistics
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-06-2009   #1 (permalink)
freeztar's Avatar
M.C. Grillmeister

Moderator
Editor
Basic Subscription
Sponsor

Location:
ATL, GA, USA
Latest blog entry:
 
freeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Text vs. Voice

I saw a funny skit last week where three high school students were sitting at a table vigorously texting. One girl looked up at the girl sitting next to her and said "I totlly agree". It gave me a chuckle. It was good comedy because it hyped the truth.

Texting is the "new" thing.
Why call someone when you can get your message across quicker and more on-point with a tweet?

Have we sacrificed handshakes for digital text?

What are the implications for our language processing and how have we been so efficient at adapting to this new paradigm? I know written language has been around for a long time, but the words you are reading now represent an historic shift, the digital era.

Psycholinguistics is a "new science", relatively speaking. There's much to be said, or speculated, on this subject.


----------------
Hypography Science Forums Moderator
---
"There are no passengers on Spaceship Earth. We are all crew." - Marshall McLuhan

"We must not forget that when radium was discovered no one knew that it would prove useful in hospitals. The work was one of pure science. And this is a proof that scientific work must not be considered from the point of view of the direct usefulness of it." - Marie Curie
Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2009   #2 (permalink)
pamela's Avatar
Creating

Moderator

Location:
neither here nor there ;)
 
pamela has a reputation beyond reputepamela has a reputation beyond reputepamela has a reputation beyond reputepamela has a reputation beyond reputepamela has a reputation beyond reputepamela has a reputation beyond reputepamela has a reputation beyond reputepamela has a reputation beyond reputepamela has a reputation beyond reputepamela has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to pamela
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Text vs. Voice

well it certainly cannot replace the spoken word or sign.Just now as an experiment, i texted my son "i love you".
Response- "ok"
now i spoke the words to him and i got both a smile and a hug as well as the words. The typed word, especially those that are abbreviated, lack the emotional intent, that the spoken word or action can effectively display


----------------
He who can no longer pause to wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as good as dead; his eyes are closed. A. E.
Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2009   #3 (permalink)
Larv's Avatar
Understanding


Location:
just south of Canuckistan
 
Larv is a splendid one to beholdLarv is a splendid one to beholdLarv is a splendid one to beholdLarv is a splendid one to beholdLarv is a splendid one to beholdLarv is a splendid one to behold
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Text vs. Voice

freeztar, remember the CB radio craze? Even Nancy Reagan had her own CB identity name, (something like "Big Momma"). Texting is about the same thing, only digital, as you astutely point out. But texting won't replace the cell phone because we like to hear each other's voices. Besides, texting is mostly for the young, who are naturally faddish. Adults with any age on them will not care to bother texting each other all the time. Too annoying.


----------------
The most incomprehensible thing about nature is that it is comprehensible. —Albert The Einstein
Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2009   #4 (permalink)
freeztar's Avatar
M.C. Grillmeister

Moderator
Editor
Basic Subscription
Sponsor

Location:
ATL, GA, USA
Latest blog entry:
 
freeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Text vs. Voice

Quote:
Originally Posted by pamela View Post
well it certainly cannot replace the spoken word or sign.Just now as an experiment, i texted my son "i love you".
Response- "ok"
now i spoke the words to him and i got both a smile and a hug as well as the words. The typed word, especially those that are abbreviated, lack the emotional intent, that the spoken word or action can effectively display
Isn't that what smilies are for?

I agree, it's apples and oranges.

But, with the increase of AI tech and advances in Neuroscience and Psychology, the line may start to shift, or fade.

Or, in a dystopian sense, we may lose our humanity...obligated to menial messages.


----------------
Hypography Science Forums Moderator
---
"There are no passengers on Spaceship Earth. We are all crew." - Marshall McLuhan

"We must not forget that when radium was discovered no one knew that it would prove useful in hospitals. The work was one of pure science. And this is a proof that scientific work must not be considered from the point of view of the direct usefulness of it." - Marie Curie
Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2009   #5 (permalink)
pamela's Avatar
Creating

Moderator

Location:
neither here nor there ;)
 
pamela has a reputation beyond reputepamela has a reputation beyond reputepamela has a reputation beyond reputepamela has a reputation beyond reputepamela has a reputation beyond reputepamela has a reputation beyond reputepamela has a reputation beyond reputepamela has a reputation beyond reputepamela has a reputation beyond reputepamela has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to pamela
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Text vs. Voice

Quote:
Originally Posted by freeztar
Isn't that what smilies are for?
trust me, my wink in person carries a whole lot more impact than this


----------------
He who can no longer pause to wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as good as dead; his eyes are closed. A. E.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[Q] Staring equal to hearing own voice across crowded room? paigetheoracle Questions and Answers 7 05-27-2009 02:42 AM
Hearing the Voice.. JulianKeller Biology 7 02-20-2009 12:56 PM
Do u text? Turtle Community Polls 40 09-08-2008 06:10 PM
Colorful text Mike Adams Test forum 9 08-13-2007 04:43 PM
Voice Recognition and Vista? alexander Computer Science and Technology 18 08-14-2006 08:58 PM

» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 27.27%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 45.45%
5 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 27.27%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:40 PM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network