Go Back   Science Forums > Physical Sciences Forums > Medical Science
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-02-2008   #21 (permalink)
Star30's Avatar
Thinking


Location:
Virginia, US
 
Star30 is a jewel in the roughStar30 is a jewel in the roughStar30 is a jewel in the rough
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Why Smoke when Lung Cancer is a leading cause of death?

RIGHT ON! Reason, I am so happy to hear you say that. Why have regrets later, if only I had.... It's not just about smoking either. All of us put ourselves at risk with unhealthy diets whether high fat or way low calorie intake (i.e. anorexic nervosa).

I hope I have not come across as judging. I am overly curious and suspicious and just plain talk too much sometimes.

Star


----------------
Star30

Florence Nightingale: It may seem a strange principle to enunciate as the very first requirement in a Hospital that it should do the sick no harm. [1859]
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2008   #22 (permalink)
DFINITLYDISTRUBD's Avatar
meh.......


Location:
Here
 
DFINITLYDISTRUBD has disabled reputation
Send a message via AIM to DFINITLYDISTRUBD
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Why Smoke when Lung Cancer is a leading cause of death?

dang it wher'd that thought go?!?!

My personal fave are people that smoke for years, get cancer and then blame the tobaco company. Uh DUH!!!!! says right on the packaging "warning this product is known to cause cancer"!!!!!!!! And those tobak execs forecd you to do it huh?!?


----------------
Last edited by trained chimp #6
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2008   #23 (permalink)
REASON's Avatar
Transparent Reflection


Location:
Blue Springs, MO - USA
 
REASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Why Smoke when Lung Cancer is a leading cause of death?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DFINITLYDISTRUBD View Post
dang it wher'd that thought go?!?!

My personal fave are people that smoke for years, get cancer and then blame the tobaco company. Uh DUH!!!!! says right on the packaging "warning this product is known to cause cancer"!!!!!!!! And those tobak execs forecd you to do it huh?!?
I hope you don't think that's where I was coming from. I take full responsibility for my actions regarding smoking. Nobody's forcing me to do anything. And I agree with you that those who take that position are ridiculous, and probably just looking for a big payday.


----------------
It seems to me that people tend to prefer to believe what they want to be real or true, despite evidence to the contrary.

When what you believe is refuted by evidence, you are faced with a choice.

Last edited by REASON; 02-02-2008 at 05:54 PM..
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2008   #24 (permalink)
DFINITLYDISTRUBD's Avatar
meh.......


Location:
Here
 
DFINITLYDISTRUBD has disabled reputation
Send a message via AIM to DFINITLYDISTRUBD
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Why Smoke when Lung Cancer is a leading cause of death?

Quote:
Originally Posted by REASON View Post
I hope you don't think that's where I was coming from. I take full responsibility for my actions regarding smoking. Nobody's forcing me to do anything. And I agree with you that those who take that position are rediculous, and probably just looking for a big payday.
No Reason that wasn't aimed at you...T'was merely a thought that seemed appropriate for that particular space in the thread. I'm rather pleased that you agree though...I'm sick of the new american way...what's so difficult about exercising common sence and taking responcibility for ones actions?

(I'm not saying you have this problem either...it's just another related thought O.k.)


----------------
Last edited by trained chimp #6
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2008   #25 (permalink)
DougF's Avatar
Hypo Contributer

Silver Subscription
Sponsor

Location:
Dark Side of the Moon
 
DougF has a reputation beyond reputeDougF has a reputation beyond reputeDougF has a reputation beyond reputeDougF has a reputation beyond reputeDougF has a reputation beyond reputeDougF has a reputation beyond reputeDougF has a reputation beyond reputeDougF has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Lightbulb Re: Why Smoke when Lung Cancer is a leading cause of death?

Quote:
DFINITLYDISTRUBD
dang it wher'd that thought go?!?!

My personal fave are people that smoke for years, get cancer and then blame the tobaco company. Uh DUH!!!!! says right on the packaging "warning this product is known to cause cancer"!!!!!!!! And those tobak execs forecd you to do it huh?!?
That happens to me to.

Well I started smoking when I was 10 (behind the barn, 40 years ago) and at that time there was no warning label, as a mater of fact all of the advertisement for cigs said how relaxing and soothing it was.

the warning label was added latter and gotten more intense over the years,
I still smoke and accept my addiction to it, although I have cut way back I still can't seem to kick the habit.
I wish I had know how bad it was before I started smoking but I cant see taking anyone to court on the grounds (I don't have the willpower to quit).
why can't they make a smoke that won't kill you?


----------------
"The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who do nothing." Albert Einstein

MySpace.com/DF34788

.
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2008   #26 (permalink)
DougF's Avatar
Hypo Contributer

Silver Subscription
Sponsor

Location:
Dark Side of the Moon
 
DougF has a reputation beyond reputeDougF has a reputation beyond reputeDougF has a reputation beyond reputeDougF has a reputation beyond reputeDougF has a reputation beyond reputeDougF has a reputation beyond reputeDougF has a reputation beyond reputeDougF has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Lightbulb Re: Why Smoke when Lung Cancer is a leading cause of death?

Quote:
Michaelangelica
Has anyone said because it is more addictive than heroin?
no but I'm glad you brought that up.
Quote:
sanctus
Is it really? In the sense if most of the ex heroin-addicts smoke
Yes, very bad if you don't smoke don't start.

Quote:
Nicotine Is More Addictive Than Heroin
I would like to thank this nations leading expert on addiction, Jack Henningfield for pointing out that nicotine is more addictive than heroin, alcohol, or cocaine. A true voice uncorrupted by tobacco money. I would also add that tobacco has a far higher death rate (33%?) than either heroin, alcohol, or cocaine. Yet, addiction criteria alone does not determine the nicotine (or illicit drug) health threat.
http://www.lycaeum.org/drugwar/hening.html
Quote:
Tobacco is as addictive as heroin (as a mood & behavior altering agent).

Nicotine is:
1000 X more potent than alcohol
10-100 X more potent than barbiturates
5-10 X more potent than cocaine or morphine
A 1-2 pack per day smoker takes 200-400 hits daily for years. This constant intake of a fast acting drug (which affects mood, concentration & performance).. eventually produces dependence.
Division of Periodontology: Tobacco Use Cessation Program


----------------
"The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who do nothing." Albert Einstein

MySpace.com/DF34788

.
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2008   #27 (permalink)
REASON's Avatar
Transparent Reflection


Location:
Blue Springs, MO - USA
 
REASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Why Smoke when Lung Cancer is a leading cause of death?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DougF View Post
why can't they make a smoke that won't kill you?
'Cause it'll probably taste like decaffinated coffee, diet pop, fat free salad dressing, unsalted chips, alchohol free beer, or some other crappy alternative to our favorite addictive ingestibles.


----------------
It seems to me that people tend to prefer to believe what they want to be real or true, despite evidence to the contrary.

When what you believe is refuted by evidence, you are faced with a choice.
Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2008   #28 (permalink)
sanctus's Avatar
Resident Diabolist

Administrator

Location:
Geneva-Bern-Zürich, Switzerland;Oslo,Norway
 
sanctus has a brilliant futuresanctus has a brilliant futuresanctus has a brilliant futuresanctus has a brilliant futuresanctus has a brilliant futuresanctus has a brilliant futuresanctus has a brilliant futuresanctus has a brilliant future
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Why Smoke when Lung Cancer is a leading cause of death?

defintelyydisturbed, I enjoy all those things too, but would I enjoy it if I weren't addicted? I mean when you don't smoke for 24h or more and then you lit a rolled cigarette usually my head starts turning; it is fun but there isn't this relaxation part...

(I smoke american spirit by the way sold as 100% pure tobacco if it is true)


----------------
Administrator

A COUNTRY WITHOUT AN ARMY IS LIKE A FISH WITHOUT A BIKE!!!


I don't believe in god, but I do believe in what others call utopies.
Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2008   #29 (permalink)
DougF's Avatar
Hypo Contributer

Silver Subscription
Sponsor

Location:
Dark Side of the Moon
 
DougF has a reputation beyond reputeDougF has a reputation beyond reputeDougF has a reputation beyond reputeDougF has a reputation beyond reputeDougF has a reputation beyond reputeDougF has a reputation beyond reputeDougF has a reputation beyond reputeDougF has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Lightbulb Re: Why Smoke when Lung Cancer is a leading cause of death?

Quote:
sanctus
(I smoke american spirit by the way sold as 100% pure tobacco if it is true)
there are all kinds of additives, in tobacco I'm no chemist and have no idea what they are.

Quote:
Cigarette tobacco additives
The following is the full and complete list of cigarette tobacco ingredients (additives) used by six major American cigarette manufacturers for the year 2000.

Additives make cigarettes more acceptable to the consumer. They make cigarettes milder and easier to inhale, improve taste, prolong burning, and shelf life. Of course, most brands only contain a small portion (5-20) of these ingredients. There are a few that contain no additives at all (notably Winston S2).

While all of these ingredients have been shown to be safe in food products by one or more regulatory bodies, there is little evidence demonstrating the safety of these additives when smoked in a cigarette. Until recently manufacturers weren't even required to list quantities or to specify which brands contained which additives.

Since 1985, the major tobacco companies have annually provided to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services a list of all ingredients added to tobacco in the manufacture of cigarettes. Health and Human Services is required to notify the U.S. Congress of any concerns it has with any ingredients on this list. This list is compiled from the year 2000 report.
Cigarette tobacco additives@Everything2.com

[Quuote=] REASON

'Cause it'll probably taste like decaffinated coffee, diet pop, fat free salad dressing, unsalted chips, alchohol free beer, or some other crappy alternative to our favorite addictive ingestibles. [/Quote]
To True.


----------------
"The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who do nothing." Albert Einstein

MySpace.com/DF34788

.
Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2008   #30 (permalink)
Jet2's Avatar
Understanding


Location:
My World
 
Jet2 is a glorious beacon of lightJet2 is a glorious beacon of lightJet2 is a glorious beacon of lightJet2 is a glorious beacon of lightJet2 is a glorious beacon of light
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Why Smoke when Lung Cancer is a leading cause of death?

Quote:
Why Smoke when Lung Cancer is a leading cause of death?
Because it sucks.


----------------
While you are busily finding your road, road is looking for you too.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
cervical cancer. Australian makes the world's first cancer vaccine. Michaelangelica Medical Science 0 11-10-2006 04:07 AM
Drafts leading to illness EWright Medical Science 19 09-27-2006 06:50 AM
Chemicals in smoke Mercedes Benzene Chemistry 5 06-09-2006 11:12 AM
World-Leading Microscope Shows More Detail Than Ever C1ay Science News 0 05-03-2006 05:09 AM
Chemicals to create smoke sheezits Chemistry 4 02-01-2005 06:07 PM

» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 30.00%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 40.00%
4 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 30.00%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 10
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:03 AM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network