Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Zythryn I am sure type 1 is also on the rise. However, I am guessing it is at a much slower rate. |
Why? This is a genetically induced autoimmune issue, whereby Type 2 tends to be more behavioral (i.e. insulin production cannot keep pace with lifestyle). How is our current lifestyle going to effect genetics in the immediate future?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Racoon I've stated this in my Chi thread, and no-wants to believe it.
Concerning type II diabetes... That Insulin produced in the Pancreas is Finite in supply!
Meaning, you drink lots of sugary sodas, eat lots of carb-loaded snacks, and your Insulin will be used up faster than other wise. |
This too strikes me as inaccurate, but I remain open to confirmation. As a Type I diabetic myself, I feel to be a bit of an expert on the subject, complete with personal experience, however, show me the data to support this and I'll be the first say I was wrong.

However, as my comment to Z above indicates, the word "production" seems more appropriate to me than the term "supply."
The logic in your statement above would seem to imply that only older people would be effected by Type II diabetes, as they would be more prone to being at the "end" of their insulin supply. Unless children were born with a tiny "pool" of insulin, it would only be much later in life before they'd be impacted by Type II, which certainly is not the case.
Now, our lifestyle has changed and we are clearly more of a Mickey D's/Flabby knees generation, but I am pretty sure insulin is not in finite supply at birth. Want an easy test? Gather a few hundred babies and measure their volume of insulin available. Gather a few hundred octogenerians and measure theirs... with maybe a few mid-lifers thrown into the bunch for graphs and trending. My guess would be that insulin is produced continually, not finite in supply over a life time.
Cheers.
