[Michaelangelica]

Smoking Pot Won't Make You Crazy, But Dealing with the Lies about It Will

a closer look at the evidence reveals that there's less here than the headlines imply.

First, there is no new study. The paper published in The Lancet is a meta-analysis -- a summary of seven studies that previously appeared in other journals, including some that were published decades ago. Second, the touted association between cannabis and mental illness is small -- about the same size as the link between head injury and psychosis. Finally, despite what some new sources suggest, this association is hardly proof of a cause-and-effect relationship between cannabis and psychosis,

So why the sudden fuss?
. . .
. . .

Despite this evidence, we'd like to spread the word that cannabis is not for everybody. Teens should avoid the plant. Folks with a predisposition for mental illness should stay away, too. This potential for health risks in a few people, however, does not justify criminal prohibitions for everyone. (We wouldn't pass blanket prohibitions against alcohol simply to protect pregnant women, for example.)

AlterNet: DrugReporter: Smoking Pot Won't Make You Crazy, But Dealing with the Lies about It Will

[Michaelangelica]

Antique Cannabis Book / A Price Guide to Antiques

History of Cannabis

Chapter 1

THE HISTORY OF MEDICAL CANNABIS


1.0 - MEDICAL CANNABIS, A SHORT GRAPHICAL HISTORY
This is a short (graphical) history of Medical Cannabis (the traditional and scientific name for Medical Marihuana), from the Neanderthals to the Reefer Madness era.

This site was created for use mostly by newspaper reporters and others who want a short but well documented history of the subject. As such we have endeavor to (A) keep it short and (B) to document as much as possible for ready reference. Example; we all know that the ancient Assyrians made use of Medical Marihuana, but have you ever seen a clay table that actually says so? You will here.

However, because the idea is to provide the reader with a "short" overall of history, many sections had to be left out. Example, very little is said about Hindu or Mohammedan medicine, NOT because it is not important, but just because it doesn't fit into the time line very well.

If needed the museum can provide more detail/complete pictures in either "jpg or gif" formats.


1.1 - The Neanderthals: --- 40,000 BC:
Cavemen-Cannabis THE NEANDERTHALS: The thought of having a medicine that was in use long before the first humans had even walked on this planet is interesting indeed; one might say it is the stuff of science fiction writers. But unfortunately, while many web sites "hint" at the possibility, there is no . . . [MORE]


1.2 - Pre-Recorded (Human) History:
Cannabis-Cave PRE-RECORDED (Human) HISTORY: The earliest known surviving Afro-Eurasian medical texts, whether ancient Egyptian papyrus scrolls, Mesopotamian clay tablets, Chinese tables etc. All of them speak of its use in the past tense, as if Cannabis had already been in medical use long before . . . [MORE]
. . .

1.11 - POST-1937 The Dark Ages (part 2):
KKK The Dark Ages (part 2) Cannabis is unique in one respect; unlike other botanical medicines which were allowed to die a natural death as other better medicines or treatments came along, Cannabis instead was cut down in its prime---literally speaking it was outlawed. . . [MORE]

1837 - 1937
The Golden Age of Medical Cannabis

[Michaelangelica]

New Study: Marijuana Might Cure Brain Tumors

Printer Friendly Version Printer Friendly Version Email this Article Email this Article
Posted in Chronicle Blog by Scott Morgan on Thu, 10/18/2007 - 7:26pm

One of the great ironies in the debate over marijuana's medical applications is that the drug may prove to be vastly more useful than many marijuana activists even realize. As the U.S. government continues to block medical marijuana research, scientists around the world are discovering new and exciting possibilities:

Investigators at Bar-Ilan University in Israel report that the administration of THC significantly affects the viability of GBM cells. Glioblastoma multiforme, the most aggressive form of glioma (brain cancer), strikes some 7,000 Americans annually, and generally results in death within one to two years following diagnosis.

"THC [is] an essential mediator of cannabinoid antitumoral action," investigators concluded. [NORML]

Or, in layman's terms, THC might stop tumors from killing people. Isn't that great? Now all we have to do is legalize it so people can cure their brains without fear of being raided by the DEA.

As evidence of marijuana's potential value in treating various cancers continues to grow, it becomes increasingly vital that we silence marijuana opponents who seek to prevent such discoveries from being made. The more helpful the drug turns out to be, the more deadly and foolish becomes the conspiracy to destroy its reputation and punish its users.

Is it really so difficult to conceive of the possibility that this plant, like so many others, exists for a good reason?

New Study: Marijuana Might Cure Brain Tumors | Stop the Drug War (DRCNet)
[

[Moontanman]

Originally Posted by Michaelangelica

Marijuana as Medicine

Perhaps the strongest argument for legalisation lies with the medical uses of cannabis. The British government is on the cusp of allowing its use to treat painful conditions, and in America an eminent medic has come out in favour. Professor Lester Grinspoon from Harvard Medical School believes that cannabis "is likely to be seen as a wonder drug of the 21st century."

Cannabis is widely known for its medicinal ability to ease a host of serious conditions:
# cancer: cannabis can suppress nausea brought on by chemotherapy
# AIDS: it can increase appetite and prevent weight-loss
# glaucoma (an eye condition): cannabis can relieve eye pressure
# muscular pain: it can ease muscle spasms and period pains


In the 19th century, cannabis was widely used to relieve muscle spasms and rheumatism. Even Queen Victoria was given it by her doctor to ease her period pains.

It was the invention of the syringe towards the end of the century that marked an end to its widespread medicinal use.

Injecting drugs meant they could take effect a lot faster. Cannabis cannot be dissolved in water, so it can't be injected.

Only recently have scientists began to scrutinize the chemical more closely, and have started to conduct clinical trials to test its medical effects.

Relief for multiple sclerosis sufferers
There are a total of 85,000 people suffering from multiple sclerosis (MS) in Britain. This incurable debilitating disease manifests itself with a host of symptoms:
# balance problems
# muscle weakness and spasms
# incontinence
# pain
# tremors

Although pharmaceutical drugs are available to MS sufferers, the condition is difficult to control. Clinical tests performed by the Multiple Sclerosis Society showed that most patients responded positively to cannabis. The drug especially alleviated spasms, pain, tremor and increased bladder control.

In addition, a postal survey was conducted amongst patients self-medicating with cannabis in the UK and the USA. More than 90% reported a beneficial effect on their condition. Unfortunately, many patients end up obtaining cannabis illegally.

Legal high
Doctors have been allowed to prescribe capsules containing THC, the main active ingredient of cannabis, for years. Nabilone - a synthetically manufactured copy of THC - was licensed in 1982 for prescription use against nausea caused by chemotherapy.


However, some patients complain of the same side effect that many people state as the drug's main recreational attraction - it gets you stoned. Due to the complex relationship between THC and receptors in the brain, researchers haven't yet managed to separate the active medical ingredients from the brain-bending ones.

Cannabis aerosols
Patients taking the drug in capsule form are unable to control the dose as they can with careful inhaling. So the pharmaceutical industry has started developing THC aerosols and inhalers that don't harm lungs. This makes it easier for patients to control their dose and prevents them from getting too disorientated
.
BBC - Science & Nature - Hot Topics - Cannabis - The Lows

I think I love you, how do you get so many positive articals about Cannibus sativa, a buddy of mine who brews beer is thinking of brewing some marijunia beer. He brewed pumpkin beer for halloween (early I know) and between the two of us (I knew that cannibus can be substituted for hops) we plan to really ring in the new year!

Mistral

[Michaelangelica]

Marijuana is an antidepressant at low doses, and parents know when kids use it
. . .
. . .significant majorities recognize that drinking and marijuana smoking are common amongst teens and don’t always require intervention.
. . .
The second study, which looked at the effects of a synthetic analogue of the active ingredient in marijuana on rats, found that low doses had a “potent” antidepressant effect while high doses actually increased depression.
. . .
The new research suggests that like alcohol, marijuana may have some benefits in moderation while doing harm in excess. But I suspect we won’t be hearing much about them from the “drug czar” soon because defense of drug prohibition-- no matter what the science says-- is actually written into his job description

Marijuana is an antidepressant at low doses, and parents know when kids use it - 60 Second Science

[Turtle]

I'm going to...pump you up!

California Gov. Schwarzenegger Defends His Past Use Of Marijuana, Saying Pot Is Not A Drug | October 31, 2007 | AHN

Originally Posted by Julie Farby

Los Angeles, CA (AHN)-California governor Arnold Schwarzenegger defended his use of marijuana during his bodybuilding days in the 1970s, saying that pot is not a drug during an interview with GQ magazine.

Schwarzenegger, a former bodybuilder/actor turned politician, was defending a picture of himself in the 1977 documentary "Pumping Iron," which depicted him smoking a joint, telling the interviewer, "That is not a drug. It's a leaf. My drug was pumping iron, trust me."

I Trust Arnold!

[HydrogenBond]

Besides the medical arguments, marijuana could be a possible plant for alternate fuel. Besides the fast growing bio-mass, that can grow almost anywhere, which can be broken down into alcohol, some strains report up to 10-20% THC by weight.



The THC ring can be cracked with catalyst, such as during the processing of crude oil, and to made bio-fuel cheaper than fermentation. One is not starting with sugar and needing to ferment it. One starts with a large molecule that can be to cut into a bunch of smaller pieces. Theoretically one can make gasoline, ethanol or any number of things. Just the tail part of the molecule could make n-octane. The -OH area and -O- areas can be used for ethanol. That rest can make other octane.

Picture a chemical plant, surrounded by acres and acres of plants that grow 15-20 feet in only 4-6 months. Huge reapers are cutting them down and filling dump trucks. These trucks are being loaded around the clock, dumping their loads onto a conveyer, which transports the biomass high into a silo. From there it is conveyed into agitation tanks, where the raw oil is extracted using some of product coming out of final process. This sweet oil is then pumped into the cracking towers. The smaller molecules are distilled into a premium grade fuel to make electricity.

[orbsycli]

There are so many uses for Cannabis that the thought of it being illegal is absolutely ridiculous.

F*** you, America. You are so dumb for outlawing this amazing plant.

[Moontanman]

Originally Posted by HydrogenBond

Besides the medical arguments, marijuana could be a possible plant for alternate fuel. Besides the fast growing bio-mass, that can grow almost anywhere, which can be broken down into alcohol, some strains report up to 10-20% THC by weight.



The THC ring can be cracked with catalyst, such as during the processing of crude oil, and to made bio-fuel cheaper than fermentation. One is not starting with sugar and needing to ferment it. One starts with a large molecule that can be to cut into a bunch of smaller pieces. Theoretically one can make gasoline, ethanol or any number of things. Just the tail part of the molecule could make n-octane. The -OH area and -O- areas can be used for ethanol. That rest can make other octane.

Picture a chemical plant, surrounded by acres and acres of plants that grow 15-20 feet in only 4-6 months. Huge reapers are cutting them down and filling dump trucks. These trucks are being loaded around the clock, dumping their loads onto a conveyer, which transports the biomass high into a silo. From there it is conveyed into agitation tanks, where the raw oil is extracted using some of product coming out of final process. This sweet oil is then pumped into the cracking towers. The smaller molecules are distilled into a premium grade fuel to make electricity.

I'm not sure what to say about this post except I'm sure I'll never see it happen.

Michael

[CraigD]

Originally Posted by HydrogenBond

Besides the medical arguments, marijuana could be a possible plant for alternate fuel.
…
Picture a chemical plant, surrounded by acres and acres of plants that grow 15-20 feet in only 4-6 months.
…

Whenever I picture a fast-growing monocrop being grown in a factory fashion, I attempt to picture the flow of its major chemical elements, especially nitrogen.

Cannabis isn’t a nitrogen fixing plant, so would have to be grown in rotation with something that is, such as soybeans, or some more exotic solution, such as flooding the fields and cultivating bacteria between planting cycles.

In traditional factory farming schemes, this need is satisfied with petrochemical-derived fertilizers at cultivation time. But obviously, a petroleum-replacing crop that requires lots of petroleum isn’t succeeding in its replacement role – a criticism frequently leveled at present-day ethanol-from-corn programs.

That said, hemp cannabis is not an ideal choice for a fuel oil-producing plant. According to this table (discussed at greater length in this “What plants might be grown, just for bio-fuel?” thread post), hemp yields 305 kg of oil / ha of land, vs. 145 for corn, 1000 for rapeseed (canola), and 5000 for oil palm.

Originally Posted by HydrogenBond

Besides the fast growing bio-mass, that can grow almost anywhere, which can be broken down into alcohol, some strains report up to 10-20% THC by weight.

Do you have a source for this, HBond?

To the best of my understanding, high THC yield and high biomass in outdoor growing are incompatible goals in cannabis growing. Particularly, high THC yield requires the plant to be frequently pruned to produce a resin-bud heavy “bush”, rather than a tall growing, leafy “stalk”.

In short, I agree with Michael’s assessment:

Originally Posted by Moontanman

I'm not sure what to say about this post except I'm sure I'll never see it happen.

However, I think there are not only political and legal barriers, but objective technical reasons, why it’s unlikely.