Official Kilogram Losing Mass. Redefine It As A Precise Number Of Carbon Atoms?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-22-2007
Hill's Avatar
Questioning
Basic Subscription
Sponsor

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 189
Hill is a name known to allHill is a name known to allHill is a name known to allHill is a name known to allHill is a name known to allHill is a name known to allHill is a name known to all
Official Kilogram Losing Mass. Redefine It As A Precise Number Of Carbon Atoms?

Quote:
It turns out that nobody can say for sure, at least not in a way that won't change ever so slightly over time. The official kilogram -- a cylinder cast 118 years ago from platinum and iridium and known as the International Prototype Kilogram or "Le Gran K" -- has been losing mass, about 50 micrograms at last check. The change is occurring despite careful storage at a facility near Paris.
That's not so good for a standard the world depends on to define mass.
Now, two U.S. professors -- a physicist and mathematician -- say it's time to define the kilogram in a new and more elegant way that will be the same today, tomorrow and 118 years from now. They've launched a campaign aimed at redefining the kilogram as the mass of a very large -- but precisely-specified -- number of carbon-12 atoms.
Quote:
The international prototype of the kilogram is a cylinder 39 mm in height and 39 mm in diameter. It consists of an alloy of 90% platinum and 10% iridium (Pt-Ir) and has a density of approximately 21500 kg/m3. It is maintained at the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM) in Sèvres near Paris.
For the full article:
ScienceDaily: Official Kilogram Losing Mass: Scientists Propose Redefining It As A Precise Number Of Carbon Atoms
__________________
'Eternity is a very long time, especially towards the end.' Stephen Hawking

'There are all kinds of interesting questions that come from a knowledge of science, which only adds to the excitement and mystery and awe of a flower.' Richard Feynman

Last edited by Hill; 09-22-2007 at 03:33 PM. Reason: Title too long
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Losing My religion ErlyRisa Political sciences 0 04-07-2007
Scientists solve major number theory puzzle Tormod General Science News 1 02-27-2007
I'm losing my hair in my specail place. XD MewSkitty Medical Science 10 02-14-2007
Redefining Reality from a Creative perspective imaginativepencil Philosophy and Humanities 0 05-06-2006
Astronomers Measure Precise Mass of a Binary Brown Dwarf Jay-qu Astronomy news 0 03-15-2006

» Current Poll
Favorite James Bond?
Sean Connery - 61.54%
8 Votes
George Lazenby - 0%
0 Votes
David Niven - 7.69%
1 Vote
Roger Moore - 7.69%
1 Vote
Timothy Dalton - 7.69%
1 Vote
Pierce Brosnan - 0%
0 Votes
Daniel Craig - 15.38%
2 Votes
Hate 'em all - 0%
0 Votes
Who's James Bond? - 0%
0 Votes
Total Votes: 13
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2000-2008 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network