Go Back   Science Forums > General Science Forums > Philosophy Forums > Philosopher's Weightroom
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-19-2008   #1 (permalink)
coberst's Avatar
Creating


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
When is? House a Home, Enemy a Friend, Banker a Thief

When is? House a Home, Enemy a Friend, Banker a Thief

Are qualities inherent in the object?

Are qualities inherent (essential character) in my apperception (the process of understanding something perceived in terms of previous experience) of an object?

We have all been raised within an objectivist philosophical view wherein the object is ‘out there’ and it possesses certain qualities such as color, roughness, and stands in certain relationship with other objects.

“Most people tend to adopt this objectivist metaphysics, because thy use their basic-level, body-relative experience of objects and forces as a model for all that exists. They thus come to think that objects have their properties “in themselves”, independent of sentient organisms, since as infants they learn object permanence and eventually come to experience properties as adhering in objects.” We have through social osmosis learned that objects are mind-independent.

SGCS (Second Generation Cognitive Science) has begun the effort to correct this fallacious view.

It seems to me that we must recognize that we can have a phenomenal world and a scientific world that often challenge one another but that each world is valid in its own way. That is to say that each world, the phenomenal (known through the senses without sophisticated thought) and the scientific, are “value-dependent”. Being value-dependent means that each world can be framed within its own “explanatory framework that presupposes differing interests, values, and views of what counts as data and adequate explanation”.

The most egregious and the most difficult to clarify error that objectivist make is the common sense assumption that objects are mind-independent.

“The world does not come to us prepackaged with determinate objects with their determinate properties. Instead we have to learn the meaning of physical objects, which we do by watching , handling them, subjecting them to forces, and seeing how they can be used—in short, by forms of interactive inquiry that are at once bodily and reflective.”

Quotations from “The Meaning of the Body” by Mark Johnson.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
meaning, objectivist


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Just want to be your friend raymond723 Introductions 2 08-05-2008 09:16 AM
Saying Goodbye to a beloved friend.... Celeste Watercooler 7 02-09-2007 09:50 AM
Islamic Terror, know your enemy sebbysteiny Political sciences 6 11-27-2006 02:06 PM
Diamonds are a scientist's best friend C1ay Science News 0 07-18-2005 05:37 AM
Imaginary Friend OpenMind5 Philosophy Forums 14 02-02-2005 05:37 PM

» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 27.27%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 45.45%
5 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 27.27%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:55 PM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network