[arkain101]

I decided awhile ago to start constructing a book and since then I have been making notes, outlines, and structure designs. But, I have a quickly written un-edited and unreviewed preview of the books concept below.

I am curious about your thoughts and opinions on this work.

This is a rough draft example, amateur at best in comparison to the finished intent.



The Book of the path to heaven on earth by the empowerment of humanty.

Through The works of Truth-Basic.




Introduction:

This book and the works that make it, is intended to form the possibility for us; as people, as families, as societies, cities, contries, and on up to humanity itself to achieve ideas beyond what we consider is in our potential.

-An idea is the embodiment of potential. It is bullet proof, it never eats, it never sleeps, it only requires our participation.


Preface: to the Book and the works of truth-basic.

I have found that wisdom is a more of a stratagy of thinking than it is a thought itself, and one of the greatest tools for developing success.

The content contained in this book is in written in the form of truth-basics. The book itself is a collaboration of smaller books focused on certain topics and written in the works of truth-basic.

I often feel that many of these writings come from a mind other than my own. I have often went to sleep and listened to words and words of wisdom that I have included in these books. There came a time in my life when I needed to pray for help. I prayed for all that was greater than I to give me wisdom but not so that I could be wise, but so that I could help myself in order so that I could help others. It must have been wisdom that allowed me to request wisdom to help mysef.

The reason I decided to write this book is that I discovered through research, study and personal conclusions that although knowledge is abound in this world and often vary easily attainable it very often has no use and accomplishes very little. I believe that when there is no structure and foundations of basic truths in the reciever of any type of knowledge it will not be put into context and undertanding effectively or at all. I find that when we do not know the most basic of knowledge and see it as truth we do not understand to the full extent of what the lessons and use of any knowledge is. This is like getting up one morning and deciding that you are going to learn how to become a sprinter. If you go out and learn all the knowledge there is to learn about sprinting but you do not know that you need running shoes to begin, your quest to become a sprinter will be dampered in countless ways. If there are rocks you will cut your feet and be unable to run. If there is hot ground your feet will be unable to endure. If you injure something your speed will be constricted. In this same manner we will only be as great as the most basic understanding we have and know as truth.
I found that as I progrossed my studies and contimplation on various topics alot of it seemed redundant and obvious, but when I realised that the quality of the organisation of this knowledge and true understanding of it was more important than the quantity of knowledge, I knew that the basic truths were the most powerful and important things for us to understand and connect together in order to get the most out of our life. I disovered how this applied to so many areas that it suprised me. It wasnt always knowledge itself, but often our actions that were involved. A quick example is a promise. We often hear and use the expressions of how large and great our promises are. I often hear people simply answer to a request that someone has made with a few short words like okay I will do it. Then person who is making the request is not satisfied and makes a further request for them to make a promise that they will fullfill the first. So the person says I promise and swear on my mothers name or something like this. When we ask ourselves, why it is that when one can not trust someones simple and basic statement that they expect a more grand and elaborated statement is going to contain more trust? If the basic lies, the complicated only lies worse. It is our bargaining system that creates these elaborations, to make something look like it has more value than it really does, or go for a value greater than its worth.

There series of truth-basic books focus on a specific area which help empower another area, which futher yet empowers the other. The system is such that it empowers itself to empower all things, and is our only guide to true progess, permanent prosperity, and eternal wealth (which is why I am considering to title as heaven on earth for the strategy to develope lasting sucess) especially when we see how much of all else has failed for us. I only hope these works will help lead us in that direction of succeeding at preserving success.

If we as a person, a people and a humanity do not understand the most basic connection to things it is my conclusion that we will fail continously at everything else to some degree or another, and at some time or another.
-End Preface







--The following can be considered a summery-glossary combo. It is aimed at having a flowing connection to each sub-topic. In truth basic, a rule is that nothing that is stated can be unconnected to what else is stated, obviously then it wouldnt be truth.

The possible future book design may be such that after the paragraphs on the list of sub-topics would contain easy reading and fun extenstion in essay like form for each sub-top. These would contain examples and stories of real world applications that further the display of the connection found in all things true, which is the ultimate truth itself.







The Truth-Basic book of relationships

Book #? Chapter #?


Person
A person is a living being who contains emotions, feelings and that can interact with the world around them, for good or worse by the capacity of their abilities and the decisions they choose to make. A person has no task, a person is the potential of an ability to function to the expectation that a task defines. A person is always a person 100% of the time. A person functions in tasks with a given percentage of their time and effort but can never put in 100% of their time or effort into a task other than the moment they currently enguaged. A person has the ability to make choices even without the knowledge of where the ability to make a choice comes from. A person is never a child nor an adult in respect to the person alone; instead, a person has various stages of abilities that have value in how well the person will survive. All persons are children that can or can not perform the task that is to parent themselves regardless of for good or worse.

Parent
A parent is a job for a person who devotes 100% of their time with a child. The job consists of many tasks, but because a parent is to be a job, a person is only a parent when they devote 100% of their time to a child. This simply means, when you work at a job, the time you spend at the job is 100% of the time you spent at the job.

There is only a child when there is a parent, and there is only a parent when there is a child. When a person teaches a child they are a parent. When a person protects a child, when a person feeds a child, when a person comforts a child, when a person becomes a role model for a child, when a person embodies an example for the child, when a person helps a child, when a person diciplines a child, when a person listens to a child, they are a parent. A parent's love for a child is love that only creates positive progression for the child and when the persons loves falls under the catagory of what makes a parent. Only when a person is engauging with a child for the purpose of the childs progression is the person a parent. A parent is a guardian. If a person is not engauged with a child with one or more of the tasks that define a parent they are not physically a parent. A parent is not a friend, but a friend can often emoby the job of a parent.

Father
A father is a person who chooses to have impregnated a women that bores a living child that is a person created in the image or genes of the living father. The child is the consequence of a father making the choice to create a living person that is an extension of their own flesh and blood. The job of the father is to be a parent as often as they can and make it the number one priority in their life to work towards being a parent just as can BE a teacher. Not all fathers are parents and not all parents are fathers. A father is always a father, 100% of the time in their life, while he or the replicated creation of his person lives. All fathers can be friends with their children.

Mother
A mother is a person who becomes impregnated by a man with or without choice only when the person makes the choices of varying levels of nourishment that lead to the consequence of the birth to a living being that is created in the image or genes of the living mother. The child is the consequence of a mother making the choices that lead to a creation of an extension of their own flesh and blood. The job of the mother is to be a parent as often as they can and make it the number one priority in their life to work towards being a parent, just as can BE a singer. Not all mothers are parents and not all parents are mothers. A mother is always a mother, 100% of the time in their life, while he or the replicated creation of his person lives. All mothers can be friends with their children.

Baby and Child
A baby-child is a person who has been created by the consequence of choices made by two persons that results in the action of the person in the form of a child(baby) being born into life. The two person's responsible for the consequence of the creation of a living being by the choices they made, become anointed as the mother and the father of the created person in the form of a child. A child is made in the image or form of the mother and the father. The physical child is produced by the particular replication of the genes that are the flesh and blood of the mother and the father. A child has no choice in whether they are created or not. A child has no choice in how they are to be parented untill they are capable to discover how to parent themselves, how to be the gaurdian of themself. A child is only a child when being engauged by a person who aims to perform the tasks that creates a parent to child relationship or event of another living person. A baby is a person who is a child when a person is acting as their parent and a person also becomes a child when the person discovers and is capable to parent themselves for good or for worse based upon the particular value of their ability.

Partner
A partnership requires two persons. A partner is a job for a person who has concirn for the well being of you -the self- first, in order to prosper in the concirns for themselves second. A person will prosper as a consequence of the effort they put in to be a partner to you as long as you hold up the other partner in the partnership to do the same. All partnerships prosper with value, but not all prosperity is from partnerships. Partners do not have to be friends.


Friend
A friend is a job for a person who is a child that is or is not a parent of themself of varying degree that interacts with you -the self or person- in a manner that is aligned with being a parent first, and the releif of partner who is not a parent second, but is not the father or the mother. A person can only aim to be a friend of another person by the choices they make to apply their ability and effort to sustain and act as a friend. A friend can be a stranger, but not all strangers are friends. Persons that are not a stranger, are not always a friend. A friend is also a partner and a parent, but not all persons are all of these.


End relationships


Although this was a flash view, I hope that my writing was able to allow you to see that the truthful and basic thing in one sector applied directly to another.

The jobs in our relationships with others and ourselves are actions that we do, and not the definitions of who we are.

It may sound too simple to have meaning. However, if someone says; "I am a teacher of a grade 5 class" and yet the kids in the class learn very little. Then the person is NOT a teacher. If he does not recognize his pride if any of being a teacher is a delusion, an entire class is hindered and the ripple then grows.

Although this is just relationships, this entire concept is like a business, except the sky scraper of the company is not the business, it is the long term struggle of humanity itself, and thus the business is just one short and small factor.

If a business fails to recognise a basic-truth of understanding it might result in the collapse of its prosparity. Presume a small water leak is occuring because the plumbing work was poor. If the business only repairs the leak but fails to understand that the plumbing is poor, a day might come where the plumbing goes under stress and leaks in various locations which causes the power to short out at a crucial time for the business and from this the business goes bankrupt.

The humanity today is full of water leaks, and many fail to understand where they are. We have alot of knowledge in ranging complexity out there that tells you how to fix it I am sure, but it does not work does it. Why?

If you can not build a humanity to last with simplicity, than a humanity built with complexity will surely fail.

This is like, If a person plays an instrument and poorly plays the most basic songs, the person will play only poorer if you send them to play in a syphony. This is true, this is basic. To recognise this and its connections is more wisdom than a thousand books.

[clapstyx]

I like the concept. Its rather like "What is the path to self realisation" one first needs to have a concept of what self realistion is and then you find you are already there and the question was in fact the path. In the same vein I think you need to have a concept of how heaven might operate to get a greater sense of the concept. I certainly dont claim to be right or wrong on this but I do feel that logically to remain in such a place you would be expected to raise the pre existing level of harmony (symbiotic or otherwise) so then the path to heaven on that basis would be in proving that capability in advance. Is it possible to create global harmony which is inclusive of both religion and nature. It is a goal of mine to pursue that because I feel that in that pursuit I will discover the actuality of my human potential. Basically I believe that if I set my goals to the extreme of what I consider to be superlative perfection in terms of outcomes then my potential lies somewhere between where I am now as a person and where I wish to be by the time I die and sometime during thet time I will reach my potential in that regard without having to worry about self limitations. Its a strange way to live a life I suppose (in pursuit of absolute ultimates) but it is a way nonetheless and life has become better with that philosophy. Right now I am working on the blueprints for the creation of universal harmony. I felt at some point in history one of us should create them and if we never pursued that as an objective we never would. At least I can say I did the original draft version!! lol

[arkain101]

Some truth-basic in action.


I got a bit of an argument for you.


You are out camping, you fall in a hole, upside down head first. You have just enough room to breath and reach your water bottle.

I come walking along and find you in the hole 1 day later. Hey, are you alright?

What would you respond. Would you stand by your beleifs and say
"Hey! ugh, yah I am hurt but I am alive. Although, I am just a product of the universe, so, just leave me here. I am just part of nature. I am no more important than bacteria.

Or would you throw your beleifs out the window when it comes down to it and say, "please get me out of this! its torture! help me out, I will pay you anything".


Which would you say?

After you said it, I would ask why?
Ie,
a)why do you want me to leave you.?
or
b)why do you want me to rescue you?

Option B please.

And I would answer. Because I want to live, and I will surely die if I remain headfirst in this merceiless hole.

Okay. I see.

With that said, if anything was ever to be explained as the most real of real, I think it would all have to start with the basis of that.

I Want to Live

What is anymore real than this?

I

Want, Need

Life


If this is the truth, then when we try to explain ourselves and our world, if what we conclude does not align with this, why would it be considered real if in a blink of an eye and without hesitence we are willing to throw it all away to live. What here has more truth and more power and more reality?

You're forcing me to Clintonize this issue. What's you definition of real?

Because I agree that reality is: The physical universe and the laws which govern it.

If that be, your reality.
Then I agree with what you say.

This part is a bit confusing.
"If this is the truth, then when we try to explain ourselves and our world, if what we conclude does not align with this, why would it be considered real if in a blink of an eye and without hesitence we are willing to throw it all away to live."

So you mean if it is the truth that the biological instinct for survival is the most "real" thing a human can experience?
Then when we as humans create stories and myths and stereotypes to describe our world and ourselves and fixedly ignore that it's all made up bullshit?
And this is proved because in the blink of an eye we all could be in a position where than base animalistic will to survive will over rule and the human contrived bullshit we burden ourselves with?

Yes, Yes, and Yes.

I AM. So I will always be.

I agree, this is a powerful statement. Please notice I am just doing an honest investigation here, not attacking anyones opinion.

If you will always be, why do we want life?

If you had the promise of life forever where would you have desire for it..

Lets see where these connections may take place:

Want: to feel or have a desire for; want strongly

Desire: hope: expect and wish; is the activity of will directed into a mental concept. Emotion is the activity of feeling directed into a mental concept.

Hope: someone (or something) on which expectations are centered, Desire accompanied by expectation.

Expectation: belief about (or mental picture of) the future

Beleif: any cognitive content held as true

Cognitive: of, relating to, or being conscious intellectual activity (as thinking, reasoning, remembering, imagining, or learning words)

When it comes down to it, if all we want is to live, our beleifs have faith and expectation of something that is true relating to our being and consciousness.

We expose what we were born with, what we had as a child, what we remember as an adulecent and what we often need to be shown as an adult.

Definitions of "I am" on the Web:
To link the subject with the proceedure

A coupula: The word copula originates from the Latin noun for a "link or tie" that connects two different things. In linguistics, a copula is a word that is used to link the subject of a sentence with a predicate (a subject complement or an adverbial). Though it might not itself express any action or condition, it serves to equate (or associate) the subject with the predicate.

predicate: a function that returns true or false as its value. It is another word for procedure

procedure: A clear specification for the sequence, timing, execution, etc. of a process.

I am, means to define your execution of the action that your beleifs have faith and expectation of something that is true relating to our being and consciousness.


It is the most real, to be. The almighty, to be. Of faith to want it. Of hope to have it.

If this is our fundamental truth, that all should be based on then what does this say?

Truth: "Love serves truth, and truth is knowledge of an external ideal which is beyond the reach of the individual's will." propositions, statements, sentences, assertions and beliefs have been offered as appropriate bearers of truth.


The last connection is appearing to be faith, love, truth.

If this at all rings fundamental with us, then as we trek onwards from this truth-basic, we should find and understand what does and does not align with this.

So you mean if it is the truth that the biological instinct for survival is the most "real" thing a human can experience?

I differ here. You won't want to live and get out of the whole because your biological instinct for survival says so. If I told you, it was just your biological instinct to survive, it will pass after you die and I CHOSE to keep on walking and leave you there.

What would you do? Would you lie to me and say, no really dude, I want to live. I need to live, I have family and friends that will miss me. People I will hurt. Also, I really want to live. It is not only because I am scared to die (biological flight fight), but because I want to live and see and learn, I want to be.

Would you lie to me and tell me it was not your animal instinct? Or would you change your mind and tell me it goes beyond this.


If you think I am trying to trap you to win this is not true. I am not intending to trap anything. I am giving you choices to make with a situation. If it feels like a word trap, its because what you are beholding probably isnt true.