[FRIPRO]

Originally Posted by InfiniteNow

Well, technology doesn't often shed light. Now, granted, we do create flashlights, and spotlights, and nuclear power... oh, and I guess chemoluminescence has been used underwater... then again, there's also fiber optics... Heat is a form of light too, so I guess I could say that we've generated new ways to start fire, heat objects and so forth... we also have street lamps... oh, and those really neat lights on the floor path of movie theaters that don't distract from the movie but keep you from bumping into everything after getting popcorn... Oooohhh.... the movie projector. Now there's a light shedding piece of technology that's fun for the kids too...

Okay, so technology does shed light. What was I saying? Oh yeah... technology hasn't shed much light on the universe itself, eh?

Is this a metaphor for "technology hasn't really assisted us in achieving a greater degree of understanding of our universe and it's origins?" If so, you may just be mistaken. Of course we still do not know everything, however, technology has clearly increased our level as well as our magnitude of understanding, not just of the Earth, but also of the universe.

I could pull up some Steven Hawking quotes, or maybe the history of the Hubble Space Telescope and the impact it's discoveries have had if that would help...

With all due respect to your words: "Is this a metaphor for "technology hasn't really assisted us in achieving a greater degree of understanding of our universe and it's origins?" If so, you may just be mistaken."

Man takes pride in his space and telescope programs; but, we must face the fact that we are hardly out of our own solar system.

True, man does have a degree of understanding close in to his planet, but the Universe size is emense and beyond our present comprehension. So a road map is necessary to guide our comprehension of the Universe and it origins, if it even had a beginning (which I challenge).

My manuscript on UIDE is being design (with contributions from men like you) to be that road map. Any constructive coments with your permission would be included in UIDE

Refer to : http://www.fripro.com/AIDE.html

[InfiniteNow]

Will you include my non-constructive comments as well?

[FRIPRO]

Originally Posted by InfiniteNow

I quickly panned upward on the screen to verify that we were not in the Theology forum before I made this request, and upon confirming this fact, I post the following:

Support your statements. There are two here for which I would like support (beside your own paper/manuscript/thesis/essay/connect the dots/ink blot demo...).

In what way are we wrong about the proposed 13 byo estimate for the universe?
If the universe is eternal, offer some hard data to support this claim.

If you want to move into the bonus round, you'll even explain to me why you think Steven Hawking is solely responsible for the estimated 13 by age of the universe.

The Big Bang did take place about 13 billion years, and it did reshape this part of our Universe. But by no means did it create the Universe. It is simple logic--you can not create anything out of nothing. So the Universe did exist before the Big Bang.

[InfiniteNow]

Originally Posted by FRIPRO

But by no means did it create the Universe. It is simple logic--you can not create anything out of nothing. So the Universe did exist before the Big Bang.

If you were to simply preface this comment with, "I don't have any solid proof, but I personally believe that..." I would not take issue with it. However, you have stated it in terms of the absolute, and for that I will request you support your statement with evidence beside personally written manuscripts.

[FRIPRO]

Originally Posted by InfiniteNow

If you were to simply preface this comment with, "I don't have any solid proof, but I personally believe that..." I would not take issue with it. However, you have stated it in terms of the absolute, and for that I will request you support your statement with evidence beside personally written manuscripts.

Is that not what my manuscript says? (refer to:http://www.fripro.com/Universe.html

There on are ample evidence to support UIDE.

Columbus did not say, he personally believed he would not fall off the Earth at the oceans edge (of the flat Earth).

He said the "Earth is round therefore I (an my ship) will not fall off the edge."

Most of the worlds scientist and religious laughed at him, and found fault.

[InfiniteNow]

Originally Posted by FRIPRO

Is that not what my manuscript says?

Is WHAT what your manuscript says?

[TheFaithfulStone]

Okay, which one of you is the chat-bot?


F:Is that not what my manuscript says?
I:Is WHAT what your manuscript says?

[FRIPRO]

You are missing the scientific point of UIDE, by your emotional replies. Why not study the two major articles that I have posted and then you will have the answer to:"Is WHAT what your manuscript says"

[InfiniteNow]

How does one miss something which is not there?

[InfiniteNow]

Originally Posted by TheFaithfulStone

Okay, which one of you is the chat-bot?


F:Is that not what my manuscript says?
I:Is WHAT what your manuscript says?

Very funny indeed.