[Pyrotex]

Originally Posted by InfiniteNow

Very funny indeed.

What's funny indeed?

[InfiniteNow]

Originally Posted by Pyrotex

What's funny indeed?

Hello, Do you have any friends?

[/BOT]

[Freddy]

Originally Posted by FRIPRO

Is that not what my manuscript says? (refer to:http://www.fripro.com/Universe.html

There on are ample evidence to support UIDE.

Columbus did not say, he personally believed he would not fall off the Earth at the oceans edge (of the flat Earth).

He said the "Earth is round therefore I (an my ship) will not fall off the edge."

Most of the worlds scientist and religious laughed at him, and found fault.

Most educated people in 1492 knew the Earth was round it was the Earth's size that was disputed. The reason King John of Portugal did not finance his first voyage was the high cost of the venture.

http://www.bede.org.uk/flatearth.htm

[FRIPRO]

Originally Posted by InfiniteNow

How does one miss something which is not there?

Mr. Junior Moderator, there is something wrong with your thinking, You are suppose to moderate the string postings in the absence of your boss. Not belittle them and change the subject matter tell no one knows what the main topic of the thread is:

The UIDE theory is very solid with hundreds of proofs that you have not taken the time to read.

[Pyrotex]

Originally Posted by Freddy

Most educated people in 1492 knew the Earth was round it was the Earth's size that was disputed. The reason King John of Portugal did not finance his first voyage was the high cost of the venture...

This is essentially correct. The notion that 15th Century Europe thought the Earth was flat was promulgated by a 19th Century historian who wanted to venerate Columbus. He was in error, but especially after America "discovered" Columbus in the 1850's, this notion that the Spanish court (and Catholocism) believed the Earth to be flat, got into OUR history books and it has been difficult to weed it out. European history books never had this problem.

[TheFaithfulStone]

Originally Posted by FRIPRO

Mr. Junior Moderator, there is something wrong with your thinking, You are suppose to moderate the string postings in the absence of your boss. Not belittle them and change the subject matter tell no one knows what the main topic of the thread is:

Definitely you.

TFS

[InfiniteNow]

Originally Posted by FRIPRO

Mr. Junior Moderator, there is something wrong with your thinking, You are suppose to moderate the string postings in the absence of your boss. Not belittle them and change the subject matter tell no one knows what the main topic of the thread is:

The UIDE theory is very solid with hundreds of proofs that you have not taken the time to read.

First and foremost I am an individual who travels through life on my own path. While this path crosses occasionally with that of others, it is still my own.

However, since you are so very knowledgable, perhaps you will consider PMing me to tell me exactly what else I am supposed to do as a JMod of the site. I would really love to hear your input. Further, I think I know what you mean, but I would like you to please clarify for me who you believe to be my "boss."

If I came across as belittling, it's because often discussion with you is like talking to a wall. You really appear to be an intelligent human being, however, you respond like a robot. I will, however, try to keep my criticism of your posts, your posting style, and your lack of understanding of the scientific method and aims less abrasive so as not to hurt your feelings.

[Pyrotex]

Originally Posted by FRIPRO

You are missing the scientific point of UIDE, by your emotional replies. Why not study the two major articles that I have posted and then you will have the answer to:"Is WHAT what your manuscript says"

Hello, FriPro.
I have a degree in physics and several years post-grad study, mostly in math. So, I went and looked at your manuscript. I have to admit, you obviously put in a lot of hard work on it. But I found much of it difficult to understand. I understood the part where you derived k-sub-f and calculated its value in gram-seconds. That was easy. It was the rest that was hard to follow.

Now, I only spent 10 minutes reading your site, but at that point, I realized that I wasn't getting any more out of it. Perhaps you have designed your website towards folks with far, far, far more background in physics than I. Perhaps you intended it to be understood by the likes of Richard Feynman (who regretably, is dead). But speaking for myself and my measly BS in physics, most of it was waaaaaaaay over my head. I couldn't tell you what your manuscript says.

[Chacmool]

Originally Posted by FRIPRO

Mr. Junior Moderator, there is something wrong with your thinking, You are suppose to moderate the string postings in the absence of your boss.

Such a snotty attitude will not get you very far around here or earn you any respect. The staff members do this job for the love of science, we don't get paid, and as such we don't have a boss.

[TheBigDog]

Originally Posted by FRIPRO

Mr. Junior Moderator, there is something wrong with your thinking, You are suppose to moderate the string postings in the absence of your boss. Not belittle them and change the subject matter tell no one knows what the main topic of the thread is:

The UIDE theory is very solid with hundreds of proofs that you have not taken the time to read.

I think you got into a bit of a logical loop Fripro. A comment was made that you had no proof other than your word. You referenced your manuscript and said the same thing. I know that you have a work in process. It is up to you to provide proof of your statements to validate the ideas of your thesis. Reminding us that you are still working on it doesn't change the fact that it is not there yet.

May I make a suggestion? You should break your effort into smaller peices. What you are trying to prove is so monsterous that even with the whole thing firmly in your head it would be difficult to explain it to others and hold it up to critical review. By working with smaller "sub themes" you may focus your effort and find that is it easier to make progress.

That is just my two cents.

Bill