Go Back   Science Forums > General Science Forums > Philosophy Forums
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-27-2008   #101 (permalink)
freeztar's Avatar
M.C. Grillmeister

Moderator
Editor
Basic Subscription
Sponsor

Location:
ATL, GA, USA
Latest blog entry:
 
freeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Are older people capable of rational thought?

Quote:
Originally Posted by questor View Post
The real question should be: At what point does a person have the experience and wisdom to realize he knew and understood very little in his younger years?
That would be subjective. It would be different for everyone.

Quote:
When does he have enough experience with all the complexities of life, death, love, social issues, finances, business, and whatever else needed for wisdom, that he can finally say-- Now I understand the way the world works.
Never. Well, he could say that he knows how the world works, but that is not the same as actually knowing.

Quote:
I doubt there is anyone under 50 that even understands himself, much less the world.
Is that not the same ignorant (lump 'em all together) discrimination displayed in the thread title, just reversed?

The superior man is distressed by the limitations of his ability; he is not distressed by the fact that men do not recognize the ability that he has.
-Confucius


----------------
Hypography Science Forums Moderator
---
"There are no passengers on Spaceship Earth. We are all crew." - Marshall McLuhan

"We must not forget that when radium was discovered no one knew that it would prove useful in hospitals. The work was one of pure science. And this is a proof that scientific work must not be considered from the point of view of the direct usefulness of it." - Marie Curie
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What viruses are capable of? hallenrm Biology 25 03-21-2007 09:37 PM
Empirical and rational reality HydrogenBond Political sciences 3 12-19-2006 03:53 PM
First robot capable of adapting!?! Zythryn Computer Science and Technology 7 11-17-2006 05:41 PM
Alleged 40,000-year-old human footprints in Mexico much, much older than thought C1ay Science News 0 12-02-2005 04:57 AM
Religion, relevant and rational? Stargazer Philosophy Forums 120 04-19-2005 10:01 PM

» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 27.27%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 45.45%
5 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 27.27%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:54 AM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network