Go Back   Science Forums > General Science Forums > Philosophy Forums
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-17-2005   #1 (permalink)
The D.S.'s Avatar
Thinking


 
The D.S. is a jewel in the roughThe D.S. is a jewel in the roughThe D.S. is a jewel in the rough
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Arrow the end of all things

here's a thought for the ages

suppose the universe goes on and on, maybe us humans do make it through the long hardships of life without killing ourselves first and live to see the days when we travel to the distant stars...a glorious thought, but what about the end? the universe willl either collapse back in on itself time after time again, until who knows when, or it will spread forever and all life will eventually fade.

I would like everyones opinion on whether or not they beleive that "the end" is truly the end or not. In my personal opinion, i do not see an end ever occuring, for if there was an end, i beleive i would not be here as i am. I beleive in something far greater than the limits of our world, i like to think of reality as a prison sometimes, much like in "The Matrix".

My logic for this kind of thinking stems from my everyday life experiance. Who hasn't waken up in the morning and asked themselves why in the world they are stuck here, in a place that can feel like a prison for mind. Often at times i find myself asking myself why suck restirctions are in place, and why i am in being at all. Why should anything be instead of nothing? Then i realize that maybe something must always be, perhaps it is the unwritten law that being must take place for there can be no end at all....an idea i wish for u all to think about.

until next time


----------------
One of the few roaming foxes amidst the snow, looking for a great change in the seasons...
Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2005   #2 (permalink)
kaelcarp's Avatar
Thinking


Location:
Rhode Island
 
kaelcarp is an unknown quantity at this point
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: the end of all things

Obviously, no one knows what is going to happen, but it might be that the very presence of intelligence in the universe causes it not to end. Consider what humanity has achieved in its very brief time here. Imagine where we will be in one million years (assuming we or whatever we produce or become survive). It's unfathomable. I mean, it's hard to picture 100 years, never mind a million. I think that it's pretty likely that we'll find a way to spread across the universe if we don't kill ourselves.

And if we manage to do that, we may well manage to learn how to manipulate space itself to create energy. We may even learn how to create a new universe with a new big bang, existing in some previously unknown pocket inside our universe. Who knows? The imagination can run wild with ideas.

What I do know is that nothing is set in stone when you think about that kind of scale. Yes, if left to its own devices, the universe will behave in a certain way. But what if it is not left to its own devices? We have billions of years to solve that.


----------------
Currently reading:
The Age of Spiritual Machines by Ray Kurzweil
and The Golden Transcendence by John C. Wright


"When the trees blow back and forth, that's what makes the wind." - Steven Wright
Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2005   #3 (permalink)
Fishteacher73's Avatar
Coincidence of Molecules


Location:
Arlington, TX
 
Fishteacher73 has a spectacular aura aboutFishteacher73 has a spectacular aura about
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: the end of all things

It would be highly unlikely that anything resembling Homo sapiens would be around for the end of the universe. If we grant an oscilating universe in which everything will eventually succumb to a sigularity in a big crunch we have at least aprox. 14 billion years before that occurs(We're still expanding right now, so even if at this moment it started collapsing, it would me billions of years before we were "crunched"). Given that time span, it would be unlikely that the humans would be in any form recognizable today (If we survived at all, even the longest dynasty has only been about 300 million years (trilobites)). Given the clutter of "open space" the Earth is bound to be smaked by something that surely will wipe out the humans. If that doesn't do it just take a look at our current ecological situation....I do not foresee any sustainablity in the huiman species in the long haul.


----------------
Don't walk behind me; I may not lead. Don't walk in front of me; I may not follow. Just walk beside me and be my friend.
Albert Camus
Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2005   #4 (permalink)
lindagarrette's Avatar
Explaining


Location:
Maryland Heights, MO
 
lindagarrette is a jewel in the roughlindagarrette is a jewel in the roughlindagarrette is a jewel in the rough
Send a message via ICQ to lindagarrette
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: the end of all things

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fishteacher73
It would be highly unlikely that anything resembling Homo sapiens would be around for the end of the universe..
I think it is highly probable that humans will survive. Within the next thousand years, we will have developed a means of harnessing solar power for energy and begun to colonize the galaxy. There have to be ways to manage any environmental obstacle we encounter. We may even be able to prevent the end from happening.


----------------
If god existed then science would be meaningless
Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2005   #5 (permalink)
kaelcarp's Avatar
Thinking


Location:
Rhode Island
 
kaelcarp is an unknown quantity at this point
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: the end of all things

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fishteacher73
I do not foresee any sustainablity in the huiman species in the long haul.
I would disagree to a point. I do think that humans as a whole are quite adaptable. It may happen that a large number of us will get wiped out at some point, but I find it more likely that we would learn how to get off this planet before a cataclysm than otherwise.

Where I agree is that I don't necessarily think that "we" will remain in a form that humans of today would necessarily recognize as human. Rather, our descendents, be they machines or some future biological concoction, are likely to be the ones who continue on. I don't necessarily mean sons and daughters when I say descendents, but our intellectual descendents.


----------------
Currently reading:
The Age of Spiritual Machines by Ray Kurzweil
and The Golden Transcendence by John C. Wright


"When the trees blow back and forth, that's what makes the wind." - Steven Wright
Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2005   #6 (permalink)
C1ay's Avatar
¿42?

Administrator
Senior Editor
Editor

Location:
33.78N 84.66W
 
C1ay has a reputation beyond reputeC1ay has a reputation beyond reputeC1ay has a reputation beyond reputeC1ay has a reputation beyond reputeC1ay has a reputation beyond reputeC1ay has a reputation beyond reputeC1ay has a reputation beyond reputeC1ay has a reputation beyond reputeC1ay has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: the end of all things

I don't believe there will be an end. I certainly don't think there will ever be a big crunch. I think as mass moves through space it will travel away from some mass and toward other mass. We have galaxies now moving away from each other while other galaxies are colliding with each other and merging. I think expansion is just a localized property of our universe in a larger infinite space. If you throw a rock in a pond it will send waves expanding in all directions. once they have dissipated the water that carried them will still be there to carry more waves.
Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2005   #7 (permalink)
arkain101's Avatar
Creating


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: the end of all things

If we are homo sapiens, and were once homo erectus, and before that, bent over sapien, and before that a monkey or gorilla, then what was the monkey or gorrilla before that, ive never seen an evolution chart go before monkey, was the monky a preditor? forward eyes... did it once have no legs.. id be interested on these thoughts.

Also, If Im am a concsiousness because I have a brain, and have a concsious ness because that brain has cells, and I am a concsiousness because those cells pass electrons from their atoms to others, and I am a concsiousness because, 75% of the cells are water molecules contained by bags, and I am a concsiousness because those atoms emmit energy and have a nucleaus, and I am a conciousness because the nucleus has quarks, and I am a consciousness because those quarks have something else, and I am a consciousness because those something elses have something else, and I am a consciousness because underneath all the somthing elses is even more something else untill eventually everything is one. Surly, I wouldnt of been able to say that if it all started from some somethings touching somethings.
Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2005   #8 (permalink)
infamous's Avatar
Visions of grandeur


Location:
Limbo
 
infamous is a name known to allinfamous is a name known to allinfamous is a name known to allinfamous is a name known to allinfamous is a name known to allinfamous is a name known to all
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: the end of all things

Quote:
Originally Posted by lindagarrette
I think it is highly probable that humans will survive. Within the next thousand years, we will have developed a means of harnessing solar power for energy and begun to colonize the galaxy. There have to be ways to manage any environmental obstacle we encounter. We may even be able to prevent the end from happening.
I agree Linda, there is an old saying; 'Necessity is the mother of invention'. So far mankind has used his ingenuity to solve many of these environmental problems. Notice, I did say many of these enviornmental problems, not all. But when push comes to shove, I'm betting on the human ability to come up with the solutions.


----------------
Tolstoy wrote; "men only learn when they're suffering". The question is; how much do you want to learn?
Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2005   #9 (permalink)
TIDUSGIYA's Avatar
Thinking


 
TIDUSGIYA is infamous around these parts
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Arrow Re: the end of all things

There Is No Begining Without The Balance For The End And Viceversa. The Center Of The Universe Is Earth, Because Where No Life Is Found But The Center Of The Universe.

If The Big Bang Happened And It Did Implode Before It Exploded Then Its More Than Likly That There Is A Huge Black Hole At The Center Of The Universe. When The Magnetic Force That Holds All Stars And Galaxies, Everything. The Magnetic Force Would Be Less Every Time A Star Dies. If The Universe Has Existed Just This Time Then Where Did Its Energy Come From. If The Big Bang Happened Then It Must Have Happened Before. Energy Eventually Fades Away Doesnt It.
Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2005   #10 (permalink)
Taraxanoid's Avatar
Thinking


 
Taraxanoid is an unknown quantity at this point
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: the end of all things

I do not believe in beginnings or endings. I believe that everything that has existed, still exists and everything that has not or will eventually exist, exists. It is not wise to think of merely one Universe, but an infinite array of them. This can be classified as a Multiverse. But really, Infinity is an element of which does not have an ending. And every theoretical beginning must have an ending in order for it to be a beginning of anything. Life can be manipulated. Human beings belong to the category of life. We can be manipulated. I believe we are being manipulated by an unknown source in order for us to believe in beginnings and endings. We are all immortal because the Universe(s) of which we occupy are infinite. Humans will last until the 'end' because the 'end' is a mere creation of us - life.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why things are so quiet... Tormod Websites 11 07-14-2006 01:43 PM
Chemical Illusions vijun Philosophy Forums 6 12-08-2005 11:26 PM
Are WE the only life in the Universe? IrishEyes Biology 237 05-26-2005 11:00 PM
The man in the shadows Killean Introductions 6 01-12-2005 04:30 PM
Things you didn't know about the Solar System Tormod Astronomy and Cosmology 2 12-16-2002 03:16 PM

» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 30.00%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 40.00%
4 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 30.00%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 10
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:08 PM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network