Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pgrmdave
The Resurection isn't proven, and, in the minds of those who believe, it doesn't really need to be proven. That is what faith is - accepting something as true even if there is no evidence....
|
I know I might be beating a dead horse here, but I really don't think anyone in the new testament
ever expected anyone to take the resurrection by faith. I will grant you that it takes some investigation to confirm its veracity in 2005. But the faith issue in the new testament was NOT whether Christ rose. The faith issue was whether it
meant something. Whether you believe the story or not, the disciples were profoundly affected by seing Christ after His crucifixion. They certainly were not wondering whether he rose (except Thomas, until he actually saw Him). They were wondering
why this happened. The apostle Paul never expected people to take the resurrection by faith. Paul used the
fact of the resurrection as a proof case to confirm that Christ was who He said He was. These arguments would be senseless if you have to accept the resurreciton by faith.
So, in 2005, we have a little work to do (in terms of historical verification) to build a case for the resurrection. But that is
not a faith step. It is an investigation.
Key point: Believing Christ rose does
NOT make anyone a Christian.
----------------
Few problems are so complex that they cannot be substantially clarified by one more cup of coffee

(or a nice cabernet if it is after 5:00)
Moderator in absentia. Return anticipated. Timing somewhat vague.