I find nothing wrong with giving humans more consideration than any other animal because we must look to our own survival first. I understand that this can be taken too far, but I think that we look to provide for the safty of the smallest groups that we belong to first:
self
family
friends
community
country
race
species
life
I think that it is part of our survival instinct, and there is nothing wrong with it. As for our numbness to numbers of people killed, I think that it is a necessary defense mechanism. If we were to feel the same emotion for millions that we do for one of our friends, or neighbors, or leaders, then we would not be able to function as a society, or as individuals. And nobody has shown what is wrong about death. Would you abolish death? Would you have all children born live until they die of old age? Do you really think that a world like that would be desirable? What about the stain on food sources, on medicine, on government and law enforcement, on wages, on housing? Death may not be desired for us as individuals, but it is a necessary force to continue on as a species.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by UncleAl
Money. If you are old and enfeebled you are a malpractice-proof training bench for new MDs and nurses. Your health insurance is an undammed river of cash with few questions asked. The moment your health insurance fails you will be allowed to die. The indigent are State-paid. Free ride! Nobody even keeps track of the payments. The only people without access to unlimited healthcare are those who work for a living and won't pay bribes.
|
Is there something wrong with doctors, nurses, administrative staff, and all the other health care professionals needing to be paid? Would you have them all work for free, and simply not pay their bills? The schools that they repay need that money to continue training doctors, so that you and I have a knowledgable professional taking care of us. It is a sad fact that there are people with no way to pay for health care, but it is not feasible to provide good health care to every person. Consider how many people would not be paid if we tried. The obvious ones - doctors, nurses, janitors at the hospitals, administrators. The drug companies, and all the people who work there. The pharmacists. The manufacturers of needles, bandages, robotics, and all other medical supplies. The people who transport medical supplies. The researchers. The construction workers who build the buildings. The people who transport the building materials. The people who mine/harvest/create the building materials. Everybody that all these people would normally buy things from.
I think that you may have simplified the situation too much, attributing all of death to a few things. Maybe it is more complicated than you think, and maybe you haven't thought through your ideas to their logical extreme.