 |
|
07-28-2005
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Thinking
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
How should the world progress?
Been reading Rael's book "Intelligent Design," out of curiosity. While his claim that he was visited by a humanoid (one of the creators of life on Earth) from another planet seems far-fetched...it's not totally implausible.
Anyway, here's a quick exerpt that I found quite intriguing. It is the humanoid speaking to Rael:
"...first of all, let us look at the political and ecomomic aspects of life. What kind of people allow humanity to progress? The geniuses. Therefore, your world must appreciate its geniuses and allow them to govern the Earth. First, power was in the hands of the brutes, who were superior to others becauase of their muscular strength. Next in power were the rich, who used their money to employ many 'brutes' in their service. Then came the politicians who ensnared the people of democratic countries with their OWN hopes--not to mention military men whose success has been based around the rational organization of brutality.
The only types of people you have never placed in power are the ones who help humanity to progress. Whether they discovered the wheel, gunpowder, the internal combustion engine or the atom, the geniuses have always allowed less intelligent people in power benefit from their inventions. Often, such people have used peaceful inventions for murderous ends. All that must be changed.
For this to happen, you must abolish al your electoral and polling systems because in their present form, they are completely unsuited to human development. Each person is a useful cell in the huge body called humanity. The cell of your foot should not decide whether or not your hand should pick up a given object. It is the brain which must decide..."
Thoughts?
----------------
-Charlie.
"The only certainty is that nothing is certain."
|
|
07-28-2005
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Local Brewmaster
Location: intellegencia [sic]
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: How should the world progress?
Not exactly new- it's Plato's idea as well. Simply sounds like another Utopian government. Who's to say the geniouses are not political geniouses, or military geniouses? Scientific geniouses are no sure bet to be a good ruler (of some sort). Just because someone can invent the wheel doesn't mean someone can decide a court case.
I don't have much faith in the electoral process myself. Most people don't know what's good for them, think in the short, short terms, and are dominated by impluse and material desires. The do not think about who would be a good leader, but who would be a good leader FOR THEM. Some say this would average out over a large country- I don't think so. Regardless, who's to say who would be a good ruler?
----------------
Every dollar you spend is a vote you cast
|
|
07-28-2005
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Creating
Location: Winterpeg, Manitoba
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: How should the world progress?
Just give me all the nukes and the world will be a better place  .
----------------
Sometimes a Hypography Forum Administrator

"With a big enough engine, even a brick will fly." -Law of Aerospace
|
|
07-28-2005
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Visions of grandeur
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: How should the world progress?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GAHD
Just give me all the nukes and the world will be a better place  .
|
Excellent idea GAHD, I'll give you my vote on that one.
----------------
Tolstoy wrote; "men only learn when they're suffering". The question is; how much do you want to learn?
|
|
07-28-2005
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Thinking
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: How should the world progress?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by UncleAl
Really? " not totally implausble?" The guy is flaming cuckoo-cuckoo. Poison the well and every sip is poisoned.
|
Disclaimer: I do not believe Rael's interpretation of the origins of life on Earth to be truth.
A few years ago (in the grand scheme), you'd be considered a flaming cuckoo, at least in some places, for thinking the world was round. But I'm sure you already knew that.
Regardless...your saying it's totally impossible that life was put here by a 25,000-year more advanced form of humanoid as an experiment or any other reason? While sticking to my disclaimer, I don't see how one could outrightly declare it an impossibility.
----------------
-Charlie.
"The only certainty is that nothing is certain."
|
|
07-29-2005
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Exhausted Gondolier
Location: Floating On An Ocean Of Hydrogen
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: How should the world progress?
There's no need to call anyone a flaming cuckoo.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GreekTTC
A few years ago (in the grand scheme), you'd be considered a flaming cuckoo, at least in some places, for thinking the world was round.
|
Which places and when?
----------------
Inutil insegnŕ al mus, si piart timp, in plui si infastiděs la bestie.
Hypography Forum PITA...... er, Administrator. 
|
|
07-29-2005
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Thinking
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: How should the world progress?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Qfwfq
There's no need to call anyone a flaming cuckoo.
Which places and when?
|
...before Pythagoras and Aristotle. Actually, I've read that Aristotle did entertain the fact that the Earth may have been flat, and at the center of the universe. But he did prove otherwise (I believe it had something to do with the shape of the shadow on the moon, and also with the way a ship looks as it comes over the horizon).
Also, some of the leaders of the christian church around the 4th century believed the Earth was flat (Cyril of Jerusalem and Diodorus of Tarsus, for example). Also, in some places in France before 1300, it was thought that the Earth was disk-shaped. I'm pretty sure the spherical conception of the Earth was unknown prior to the 5th century B.C.
----------------
-Charlie.
"The only certainty is that nothing is certain."
|
|
07-29-2005
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Exhausted Gondolier
Location: Floating On An Ocean Of Hydrogen
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: How should the world progress?
I doubt Pythagoras and Aristotle were quite the first to see the Earth being round, and it's true that Greek philosophers had measured the radius of Earth and compared that of Earth and Moon. Aristotle agreed with Ptolemy about Earth being the centre of the cosmos and perfectly still, I doubt he had ever thought the Earth to be flat. There have always been people up on high mountains, even well before the 5th century B.C.
Many people have thought the Earth to be flat, as recently as the Middle Ages, more out of obtusity and lack of observation, but only the most ignorant of ignorant would have thought you were "a flaming cuckoo" for thinking it was round.
----------------
Inutil insegnŕ al mus, si piart timp, in plui si infastiděs la bestie.
Hypography Forum PITA...... er, Administrator. 
|
|
07-30-2005
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Questioning
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: How should the world progress?
Something can be implausible yet possible. It's possible he was visited by a 'space alien' - just not plausible.
Also, what is progress? It took a few geniuses to create the first atom bomb as well as the current socioeconomic experiment that's maintaining so much oppression around the world. It's arguable that if we all had walnut-sized brains like the dinosaurs, we too might stand a chance of surviving for a hundred million years.
|
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
|
» Advertisement |
|
|
|