Quote:
Originally posted by: Uncle Martin
I've watched cats torture mice and birds for no apparent reason other than their own amusement.
|
Yes. *You* (the human) assume that the cat's behaviour is evil.
Quote:
|
So I guess it does come to intent. Does ignorance of the consequences of ones actions negate an evil intent? Works in a court of law.(not guilty by reason of insanity)
|
I think it is difficult, semantically, to draw a line between "intended evil" and "accidental evil". But all these examples are behavioural.
What about OP5's question "what is evil in essence"? I assumed he was asking about if there is such a thing as an "evil force", assumingly in opposition to the "universal good".
OP5's example of the Christian devil is interesting, since it in many ways is a symbol of all things evil (and the ultimate evil, perhaps). Historically I believe this has been much of the basis for the discussion of free will - if there is such a thing as a Master Evil being, tempting us away from the Right Way, and if there is a Good Bein, showing us how to avoid these tempations, then...well...you have the foundation for a religion.
I think neither good nor evil is inherent in the universe. Nor do I think it is limited to human beings. If it implies intent, I would say Unc's cats could be found to have evil streaks. If we found ET, he would also be prone to streaks of evil. I think evil might be a socialogical necessity, or at least a result of intelligence (okay, not ready to go into that discussion yet).
But I don't think this evil comes out of a universal force.
By the way, there is a big difference between the devil and Hades - the Christian devil was a fallen angel, ruler of Hell, where bad people go. Hades was a God (brother of Zeus and Poseidon) - the ruler of the underworld in Greek mythology - and *everyone* who died went there. So the spirits of the dead would end up there no matter how good the person had been.