| | #1 (permalink) | |
| Questioning | What is the logic behind the survival success of..? Hi everyone, I am part of a scriptwiting team making a movie to raise money to preserve the worlds oldest rainforest. Some of the things we hope to save are the worlds first flowering plant, first songbird and first fruit tree. One of the scene we are developing revolves around a dinner party held in the forest and we are looking for dialogue inspiration. As a starter we are wondering if anybody out there has any theories on how the first flower might have aided the chances of survival of the first flowering tree. ie what was it that made the flower as "an invention" (created or evolved) a success. Thanks for your help on this one. Darren | |
| ||
| | #2 (permalink) | ||
| Kuōn ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Quote:
![]() ---------------- Cynic, n: a blackguard whose faulty vision sees things as they are, not as they ought to be. ~Ambrose Bierce ![]() | ||
| |||
| | #3 (permalink) | |
| Explaining | Re: What is the logic behind the survival success of..? A: Plants have been on the land for hundreds of millions of years. Right? B: True, but it was only around 135 million years ago that flowering plants emerged. They offered a much more efficient way of reproducing. A: 135 million. Dinosaurs and such. So, do we know what the first plant looked like? B: We think they were pretty much like magnolias or water lilies. They lack several of the more sophisticated components found on modern flowers. C: Turns out that isn’t quite true. Well, actually it’s wrong. We now think the closest to that first flower is something called Amborella, a small, cream coloured flower found only on the South Pacific island of New Caledonia. The ancestral flower was probably pollinated by prehistoric beetles. Based upon the following: http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/DeepGreen...ngtonPost.html New Caledonia isn’t exactly the Amazon. I hope that doesn’t screw things up. ![]() | |
| ||
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is Jesus' Resurrection Plausible? | Biochemist | Theology forum | 124 | 11-21-2007 03:32 PM |
| Defining the nature of rational discussion! | Doctordick | Philosophy of Science | 203 | 05-29-2007 02:58 PM |
| suggested books on evolution | not_really | Biology | 9 | 12-27-2005 10:36 AM |
| Difference of Reason and Logic | TINNY | Philosophy and Humanities | 4 | 02-03-2005 01:00 PM |
| Critical Thinking, Logic, Reasoning and Fallacies | Freethinker | Philosophy and Humanities | 65 | 09-02-2004 07:37 PM |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:17 AM.











Cynic, n: a blackguard whose faulty vision sees things as they are, not as they ought to be. ~Ambrose Bierce 






