Science Forums
Advanced search
User Name
Password

Science Social Network
home    members    help/rules    who is online    contact   

Go Back   Science Forums > Humanities Forums > Philosophy of Science
Become a science forums sponsor today
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-22-2007   #11 (permalink)
arkain101's Avatar
Creating


 



Re: Interest in ... significant things

Just as an additive reading.. Althought many choose not to read some of the works in the bible, there is an interesting read in there that I found. I didnt know it was in there untill recently. I was compelled to link this here for some reason when I read through part of doctor D's original post. I kept seeing Ecclesiastes. So its just a cool read, and one might enjoy.

BibleGateway.com - Passage*Lookup: Ecclesiastes 1 ;
Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2007   #12 (permalink)
tierradelfuego's Avatar
Thinking

Basic Subscription
Sponsor

 



Re: Rethinking…Is There a Next Einstein?

Quote:
Originally Posted by HIENVN View Post
Is There a Next Einstein?
Yes, assuming that humans survive on Earth long enough, there will be another person in the field of physics that attains the influence of Einstein, though one cannot predict when this might happen.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HIENVN View Post
He worried that if he neither produced a theory nor showed that one was impossible, perhaps no one ever would.
His remark shows either an incredible assumption that he had enough empirical observations about reality to formulate said theory or an incredible disdain for the value of future empirical observations and the ability of someone to employ those future empirical observations to formulate said theory. (Note that I am not implying that said theory shall be formulated.)

Quote:
Originally Posted by HIENVN View Post
Do you think his remark true?
Perhaps it is true, and perhaps it is false. Perhaps no one will ever formulate said theory because the composite elements of said theory, that is, the component theories, are themselves not capable of combination, or are not completely valid representations of reality.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rethinking…Classic Mechanics will be Return HIENVN Philosophy of Science 27 10-31-2006 12:38 AM
Rethinking…Classification of Scientific Theory HIENVN Philosophy of Science 2 10-20-2006 12:52 PM
Einstein at least 99.95 percent right Tormod General Science News 7 09-28-2006 01:37 AM
The Einstein Dilemma CerebralEcstasy Astronomy and Cosmology 18 08-17-2006 01:45 PM
einstein orbsycli Watercooler 12 03-10-2005 07:06 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:50 AM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc. Copyright © 2000-2008 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network