| | #1 (permalink) | |
| Kuōn ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | I have found some previously undescribed numbers related to perfect numbers. Anyone care to comment? A few lists attached. Addendum: The list of Strange Set elements is in post #146 Last edited by Tormod; 09-01-2008 at 08:22 AM. Reason: added clickable link to post 146 | |
| ||
| | #2 (permalink) | ||
| Hypographer ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Strange Numbers Quote:
---------------- Your Friendly Neighborhood AdministratorWant to sponsor Hypography? Buy a print in our Fall 2008 Benefit Sale Join our Facebook group or follow us on Twitter Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality. - Carl Sagan | ||
| |||
| | #5 (permalink) | |
| Kuōn ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ___Begin with the idea of perfect numbers;OK? Now if a number's divisor sum equals that number it's perfect, if the sum is less it's called deficient, & if the sum is more it's called abundant. So all Strange numbers are abundant by exactly 12(twice the first perfect number six) The set of Bizarre numbers abundant by exactly 56 (twice the second perfect number 28). ___The sets' discovery I believe is original to me; I have never seen them described. They are further special because most of the members of each set have the same number of divisors. Because some don't fit the general pattern of set elements having a perfect number as a divsor (304 for example in the Strange set), the only way to find these sets is to factor the integers sequentially. Since factoring is considered a "hard problem" in computer science, looking for large elements to the sets as well as elements that don't fit the general rule takes considerable time. It's interesting because no one ever found them before & I did & the topic of perfect/deficient/abundant has been studied for thousands of years. Lay it on me. Last edited by Turtle; 06-01-2005 at 06:52 PM. Reason: clarification | |
| ||
| | #6 (permalink) | ||
| Explaining | Quote:
of Strange numbers need to be abundant by 12 ??? So to hear you out.. The divisors of 12 are 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 in which the sum is 16 and thus abundant. The divisors of 24 are 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12, in which the sum of 28 and thus abundant. So this makes 24 and 36 strange because they are both 12 more than an abundant number ? Am I getting this right ? ![]() Maddog | ||
| |||
| | #7 (permalink) | |
| Kuōn ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Strange Numbers Almost there. What is critical here is the 'difference' between a number & the sum of its divisors. All the sets I found consist of abundant numbers. The uniqueness in them is the amount of their abundance;the difference. The quality of having a divisor sum exactly 12 more than itself is literally what defines "Strange Number". To find all the Strange Numbers (actually the set is infinite), you have to factor the integers sequentially & subtract each integer from its divisor sum; when this difference is 12, voila, you found another Strange Number. If that difference is 56, you found a Bizarre Number: 992, found a Peculiar Number:16,256, found a Curious Number:etc. Note that there are no other regular sets like this which have a difference of say 7, or 13, or 2,345, etc. Last edited by Turtle; 06-01-2005 at 06:54 PM. Reason: clarity | |
| ||
| | #8 (permalink) | |
| Explaining | I would conjecture from your statement that every multiple of 12 beyond 12 is a strange number using you definition. To check the next few 36: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 12, 18 => sum = 55 > 36 => abundant 48: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24 => sum = 76 > 48 => abundant 60: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 12, 15, 20, 30 => 108 > 60 => abundant So what does this mean ??? Maddog | |
| ||
| | #9 (permalink) | |
| Kuōn ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Strange Numbers ___Ouch; just lost a twenty minute respose into the ether! Rats. ___Ok 60 is abundant but not Strange because 108-60=48. To be Strange the difference must be 12. You can find most Strange numbers by multiplying 6 (a perfect number) times a prime, but this does not find 304, which does not divide by 6(or 12). Most Strange numbers have exactly 8 divisors (4 pairs) & 304 has 10 (5 pairs) 304 I call an anomalous Strange Number & the next anomalous Strange Number is 127,744. The other sets also have these anomalous & so the only way to find them all is factoring. ___What does it mean? It means I found something everyone for a couple thousand years has overlooked. It's like if you found a new cave, you would explore on your own as much as possible & then begin showing people what you found. Let them decide what it means; but you always remain the ONE who found it first. Last edited by Turtle; 04-03-2006 at 02:54 PM. Reason: clarity | |
| ||
| | #10 (permalink) | ||
| Explaining | Quote:
it be any other value ? What is so special about 12 ???? ![]() Maddog | ||
| |||
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| mathematics, number theory, numbers, strange numbers, strange sets |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New Sets Of Numbers Discovered | Turtle | Introductions | 3 | 01-18-2005 11:10 AM |
| hey, Lets start some math discussion! | Tim_Lou | Physics and Mathematics | 33 | 01-17-2005 06:22 PM |
| Prime numbers | robi | Physics and Mathematics | 0 | 01-26-2004 10:20 AM |
| Book Review: just six numbers | Tormod | Books, movies, games | 5 | 05-12-2002 02:21 AM |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:02 AM.











Your Friendly Neighborhood Administrator









