| ||||||
![]() |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) | |
| Thinking | It's not clear to me why the Lorentz transformation can't be reduced to the Galilean transformation by resetting clocks, rescaling distance measures and fiddling with clock rates according to the recipe on page 11 of A Derivation of the Lorentz Transformation From a Simple Definition of Time and equations (48) to (58). How do you answer this riddle? | |
| ||
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| magic? | firebladeiii | Physics and Mathematics | 3 | 06-26-2008 02:02 AM |
| Same word completely different meaning | sanctus | Linguistics | 0 | 03-20-2007 01:44 PM |
| Magic Squares | Racoon | Physics and Mathematics | 14 | 05-03-2006 05:23 PM |
| "Magic" numbers remain magic | C1ay | General Science News | 6 | 12-18-2005 01:22 AM |
| Twin Paradox, Paradox? | EWright | Physics and Mathematics | 24 | 07-21-2005 10:40 PM |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:09 AM.












