Special Relativity

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-06-2005
HydrogenBond's Avatar
Creating

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,970
HydrogenBond is a name known to allHydrogenBond is a name known to allHydrogenBond is a name known to allHydrogenBond is a name known to allHydrogenBond is a name known to allHydrogenBond is a name known to allHydrogenBond is a name known to all
Special Relativity

If one plots the special relativity gammer velocity for mass, distance and time, as three axis on a 3-D grid, from 0 to C, the following figure results. (000) is (Vm=0, Vd=0, Vt=0); (C00) is (Vm=C, Vd=0, Vt=0), etc. This plotting arrangment was used because whereas gamma leads to infinity and nebulus boundries, gamma velocity is constrained from 0 to C and therefore has very definitive boundries.



If one looks closely these apex points are the eight singularities of physics. The definite boundires due to plotting gamma velocity allows these singularities to be explained in terms of 0 and C. I will do two; the black hole. Its high gravity is indicative of extreme mass density (Vm=C) its point size implies Vd=0 while its long life stability implies Vt=C. The mass point singularity; It has extreme mass Vm=C, it was very small Vd=0 and only lasted an instant Vt=0.



A more detailed special relativity cube analysis can be found at http://makarewicz.clearwire.net/Spec...Relativity.htm. The edges of the cube define the forces of nature, space and relativistic reference. While the faces of the cube define energy at C and a complementary zero velocity refererence. What this plotting schema suggests is that special relativity style effects can occur as three separate parameters.

Currently one assumes all three, mass, distance and time have to change together in proportion to one gamma velocity. But if one plots that, one only gets a single line from (000) to (CCC) and nothing else. But if we plot them acting separately, all the laws of physics can be plotting and integrated into one graph. The gamma velocites of mass, distance and time, being able to act independantly and/or together might be a third postulate of special relativiity.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-06-2005
UncleAl's Avatar
Creating

Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 1,042
UncleAl is a glorious beacon of lightUncleAl is a glorious beacon of lightUncleAl is a glorious beacon of lightUncleAl is a glorious beacon of lightUncleAl is a glorious beacon of lightUncleAl is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Special Relativity

Illucid. The three variables of physics' space are

1) Planck's constant, h, enforcing uncertainty in measurement, h-bar is the fundamental unit of action;
2) Newton's constant, Big G, scaling gravitation;
3) Lightspeed, c, limiting maximim information transfer rate.

Even if you are feeling perky and have a fine hand for drawing tesseracts, adding Boltzmann's constant defining thermodynamics is redundant. Thermodynamics plus the Bekenstein bound is General Relativity.

? h=h G=G c=infinity
mechanics,
electrostatics: h=zero G=zero c=infinity
classical physics: h=zero G=G c=infinity
quantum mechanics: h=h G=zero c=infinity
special relativity: h=zero G=zero c=c
general relativity: h=zero G=G c=c
quantum field theory: h=h G=zero c=c
Theory of Everything: h=h G=G c=c
__________________
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2

Last edited by UncleAl; 09-06-2005 at 11:46 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-06-2005
HydrogenBond's Avatar
Creating

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,970
HydrogenBond is a name known to allHydrogenBond is a name known to allHydrogenBond is a name known to allHydrogenBond is a name known to allHydrogenBond is a name known to allHydrogenBond is a name known to allHydrogenBond is a name known to all
Re: Special Relativity

I presented this diagram because it allows one to express theoretical singularities with just C and 0. What it seems to amount to is a diagram of a variety of relativistic references. These references show mass increase, distance contraction and time dilation acting independantly of each other. This is usually not what one expects, but this imtegration only works with the indendance assumption. One good example might be subparticle aggregates like protons. The quarks and gluons can last billions of years within protons. Take them out or put then in other hadrons, and they disappear in a fraction of a second. Could this be time dilation without mass increase or distance contraction since only their time scale changes between these two environments? Mass and distance type properties remain the same. One can then give the proton aggregate velocity such that the aggregate summation now gains mass, distance, time relativity in proportion, with two layers of time dilation and only one layer in mass increase and distance contraction. Take the quarks out of this aggregate than there is only one layer of time dilation and a very short life, i.e, time dilation potential energy is gone. The orignal proton didn't form in the lab but formed at neat the beginning of the universe when time dilation was much higher. It was built to last the life of the universe.

Last edited by HydrogenBond; 09-06-2005 at 01:54 PM. Reason: additional commet
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Theory of Special Relativity for the Totally Confused Beginner Damo2600 Strange Claims Forum 30 08-04-2006
Special Relativity in a Parallel Universe Perspicacious Physics and Mathematics 7 08-30-2005
Special Relativity for Hopeless Morons? DrProctopus Physics and Mathematics 13 08-29-2005
Einstein's Special Relativity Fails? Mac Physics and Mathematics 264 05-20-2005
Special Relativity Aki Physics and Mathematics 0 12-31-2003

» Current Poll
Favorite James Bond?
Sean Connery - 63.64%
7 Votes
George Lazenby - 0%
0 Votes
David Niven - 9.09%
1 Vote
Roger Moore - 9.09%
1 Vote
Timothy Dalton - 9.09%
1 Vote
Pierce Brosnan - 0%
0 Votes
Daniel Craig - 9.09%
1 Vote
Hate 'em all - 0%
0 Votes
Who's James Bond? - 0%
0 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2000-2008 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network