A Few Articles On The Conversion of Energy Into Matter

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-22-2004
Curious

Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1
Liberator is an unknown quantity at this point
A Few Articles On The Conversion of Energy Into Matter

I recently read an article on the net about the conversion of energy into matter. An experiment at Stanford University was accomplished at S.L.A.C. (short for Stanford Linear Accelerator Center). Michael Pidwirny, the guy who wrote it claimed that it might one day be a useful means of teleportation like in Star Trek. Here is a direct quote from him:


"In 1998 researchers at Stanford University's Linear Accelerator Center successfully converted energy into matter. This feat was accomplished by using lasers and incredibly strong electromagnetic fields to change ordinary light into matter. The results of this experiment may allow for the development of variety of technological gadgets. One such development could be matter/energy transporters or food replicators that are commonly seen in some of our favorite science fiction programs."


Here is the website:

http://www.physicalgeography.net/fundamentals/6a.html


Here are some links to SLAC's statements released to various publications concerning the experiment:

http://www.slac.stanford.edu/exp/e144/nytimes.html

http://www.slac.stanford.edu/exp/e144/science1202.html


Teleportation has already been accomplished by teleporting a photon's properties, however, not the actual photon itself. For more information, check out the following website:


http://www.aip.org/physnews/graphics/html/teleport.htm


Personally, I don't think that there will ever be a conventional use for converting energy into matter because of the amount of energy contained in one human being. Think about it: if one human can produce thousands of hiroshimas bombs, then you would need thousands of atom bombs worth of energy to create a turkey sandwich. That just doesn't seem practical to me. If that amount of energy were to be released when turning a man into energy, well let's just say there wouldn't be much left of anything for a few thousand miles! In any conversion of matter, some energy is inevitably lost. In addition, such conversions of particles to energy are called annihilations, that is, they are like explosions: the explosive material is completely destroyed and no memory of its original form remains.


But let's play with this thought experiment for now. The atoms that compose our bodies are replaced every (7 years?), I've heard (I don't pretend to know the exact figure, but it seems reasonable). If this is the case, then after 7 years, you are physically completely different than you were at the beginning of the 7 year period. Then, in introspect, I realize to myself that I have a continuity of experiences, at least, my stream of consciousness is not noticeably interrupted.


Now imagine for the sake of arugment that teleportation were to be accomplish by converting a person into energy and you had the technology to reverse the process. In addition, you send the information along with the energy.


The question is, would the person survive the procedure, or would the individual cease to exist and be replaced with a replica, who was literally born into existence once the energy was reconverted back into matter with the information? In my view, when your body is destroy, you die. End of story. What comes out of the teleporter is an exact copy, with all your memories etc, and no knowledge that it isn't you, but it isn't. No one would ever notice the problem, so it only affects you when it happens. Unless, if you believe in souls, there are "conservation of souls" problems to deal with - does the same soul follow the body around? While in an energy state, there is no consciousness, no heart to beat, hence the person who first underwent this form of teleportation has cease to exist and replaced with a replica.



What does everybody else thinks? (Note: I know this question sounds a bit philosophical but I'd be very interested in everyones' opinion anyway.)


Liberator
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-22-2004
Tim_Lou's Avatar
Explaining

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edison, NJ
Posts: 919
Tim_Lou will become famous soon enoughTim_Lou will become famous soon enough
Send a message via MSN to Tim_Lou
RE: A Few Articles On The Conversion of Energy Into Matter

well, to convert a human into energy, you need an "anti-body" to annihilate w/ you....lol, impossible.

creating matter out of photons are pretty pointless, once the anti-matter is created, it will simply annihilate w/ its anti-matter, which is the nomal matter. photons create matter, but they instantly annihilate back to photons....lol

(am i right?)
__________________
I have mistaken, apologized, and taken the consequences. My only regret, was for how I was bothered by the unchangable.
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2004
Questioning

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Bristol, UK
Posts: 160
WebFeet is an unknown quantity at this point
RE: A Few Articles On The Conversion of Energy Into Matter

When an electron and a positron annihilate each other, the result is two photons.
The two particles contain the same amount of energy but their charge is opposite.

Does raise the question whether the electron consists of a reconfigured photon, or collection of photons.
Electrons jumping to lower shelves lose energy in the form of a photon - coincidence ?
Closed Thread

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Instantaneous travel of macroscopic objects? DivineNathicana Physics and Mathematics 57 03-03-2005
What would it take to prove the existence of a God? harmoniouschaos Philosophy and Humanities 207 02-27-2005
Matter & Energy Whitestar Computer Science 3 06-03-2004
Matter & Energy Whitestar Computer Science 24 06-02-2004
matter and energy?? Tim_Lou Physics and Mathematics 9 04-06-2004

» Current Poll
Favorite James Bond?
Sean Connery - 63.64%
7 Votes
George Lazenby - 0%
0 Votes
David Niven - 9.09%
1 Vote
Roger Moore - 9.09%
1 Vote
Timothy Dalton - 9.09%
1 Vote
Pierce Brosnan - 0%
0 Votes
Daniel Craig - 9.09%
1 Vote
Hate 'em all - 0%
0 Votes
Who's James Bond? - 0%
0 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2000-2008 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network