ah, excellent, infy, i will gladly ellaborate.
it starts with one's perception of "moving foreward". instead of thinking of progression as time or progressing numerals, i think what i am trying to express is that perhaps progression is more...erm..."darwinian". what a horrible example, but perhaps the ever changing and evolving surroundings of what we percieve IS progression, but that instead of thinking of the ortations of planets and effects of gravity as examples of time, instead take them at face value, perhaps they arent anything more than what they appear, the effects of gravity. it goes way back in time, humans wondering why sometimes it was light and sometimes it was darker, and therefore that constituted an idae of "time". but, instead think of it and the moving and changing effects of gravity in the cosmos.
of course, that could very well be complete bunk. im abou thalf playing the devils advocite here, so bare with me
Proof of Time 
