Go Back   Science Forums > Physical Sciences Forums > Physics and Mathematics
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-16-2007   #1 (permalink)
arkain101's Avatar
Creating


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Converting gravity equations?

I've been researching some theoretical concepts on gravity and had a thought I wanted to try and express.

What I am considering is to express gravity the same way as general relativity does as a dent in space-time fabric.

However, I am wanting to present that fabric with a given resistence so to speak.

This is, to consider all 'mass' to dent this fabric to some degree, however, the dents curve ratio and value would be entirely related to the pressure per square 'cm' (using these units for temporary simplicity) that a body of matter puts on that fabric.

For example, Consider the expression of gravitatinal constant a given value of the resistence of the fabric in a 2d type of illustration.

The 'mass' of an object would be represented by this value of the dent. The density to mass ratio would determine how this dent would be calculated and geometrically expressed.

Therefore, the more dense an object, the more pressure per square cm this body of matter can put on the fabric, or vice versa, the value of the dent/gravity force, is entirely perpotional to the density and mass of the object.

At which point, if the mass to density ratio reaches a given pressure per square inch on the constant fabric, it may be capable to poke a so called "hole" right through like a needle through a rubber sheet.

Is this worth pursuing?
Also, is anyone able to easily work this out? That is, to rather convert general relativity, to pressure,mass,density like equations.

I obviously would have alot of trouble constructing these mathamatics, but it would involve a given constant of resistence of the fabric sheet for a given force / pressure on a square cm.

And therefore you would futher express each atom that makes up that object capable to perform the same effect on its sheet of fabric. However, this particualr atomic scaled sheet would very possibly calculate to have a different constant of resistence to pressure.

As for extending my thoughts; anti-matter, could be attempted to be expressed as creating a mirrored dent, that is, a buldge in the same material. Where as, in 3D form this creates a seperation, or oppostion between the two types of matter.

As the dent, lessens, therefore the mass of the matters dents decreases, energy is produced and delivered through the rest of that plane.
Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2007   #2 (permalink)
arkain101's Avatar
Creating


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Converting gravity equations?

To be expressed in a way similar to this.

The further down the scale an object is, the more its mass to density ratio, and the slower the time ticks relative to the speed of light.

So we have C horiztonal, and C verticle.

The object is placed on its ratio within C^2

Just out of curiosty aswell

Can

be expressed as:
Attached Thumbnails
Converting gravity equations?-gravity.jpg  

Last edited by arkain101; 02-16-2007 at 09:58 PM..
Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2007   #3 (permalink)
sanctus's Avatar
Resident Diabolist

Administrator

Location:
Geneva-Bern-Zürich, Switzerland;Oslo,Norway
 
sanctus has a brilliant futuresanctus has a brilliant futuresanctus has a brilliant futuresanctus has a brilliant futuresanctus has a brilliant futuresanctus has a brilliant futuresanctus has a brilliant futuresanctus has a brilliant future
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Converting gravity equations?

Very ineresting, but isn't it already in the seeked form? I mean if you look at the Einstein equation:


On the right you have the energy-momentum-stress tensor (however you want to call it), if you look at the universe in big enough scales you can approximate it with a perfect fluid where the EM pressure is just diag(-,P,P,P) with P the pressure. Now on smaller scales you have another EM tensor but I guess you can still interpret the element on the diagonal as something like pressure....

And why wouldn't you be able to express the famous equation like E/C=MC? It's up to you to interpret what it means...


----------------
Administrator

A COUNTRY WITHOUT AN ARMY IS LIKE A FISH WITHOUT A BIKE!!!


I don't believe in god, but I do believe in what others call utopies.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to: use LaTeX for equations Tormod Tutorials and How To's 20 04-23-2008 06:24 AM
Converting ml -> grams... of methanol. Kirol Chemistry 9 12-20-2005 04:54 PM
Synergistic Probability Equations clapstyx Physics and Mathematics 3 02-26-2005 11:55 AM
Equations and constants Moonchild Physics and Mathematics 2 11-02-2004 12:43 PM
converting MKSA into Gauss units? sanctus Physics and Mathematics 3 09-13-2004 11:38 PM

» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 27.27%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 45.45%
5 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 27.27%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:16 AM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network