Physics and Mathematics Forum should help researchers

[M.A.Padmanabha Rao]

It is interesting to note that Hypography Science Forums has cited my “six fundamental physics discoveries” by 10 July 2004 as shown below. The only difference is that I joined as a new member to this Forum on 01-11-2005.

Search Results
Your search for Six, fundamental, physics, discoveries found the following documents (of 2040 documents searched): Displaying documents 1-10 of 514, with best matches first:
1. Six fundamental physics discoveries in atomic, nuclear and radiation physics Individual doing six discoveries could be a rare instance in the history URL: http://education.vsnl.com/scientificresearch- 49KB - 10 Jul 2004

This Forum can really help researchers and encourage more to join if the Editor and member take care of few aspects that I suggested below, if found appropriate.
It is a fact that when a researcher cites his work, he can not do it by citing his nickname or short ID as I did in my recent postings like Gamma and X-ray exceeds light in velocity: new Find 1. Since members are allowed to use their short ID of their choice without any need to mention their official position, some are found taking advantage, used impolite language, asked for official rank, and qualifications, while they hide their information. Since we are all scientists and the discussion is aimed to promote science, we can make the discussion very useful and lively when the members quote their actual user names and official position.

2. It is a fact that original finding/ breakthrough/ scientific discovery is a very rare event in science, so if any one claims it is simply unbelievable to fellow scientists. For my posting on “Daughter radiation to beta, gamma and X-ray ” , I did receive some criticism or comments from members and the Editor that I should normally accept as part of life of a scientist. (a) The real problem arose when no more threads are allowed to reply to the criticism made on my work, qualifications, and rank. (b) Secondly, these postings are aired in Internet that brings discredit to me as researcher. (c) I saw over 20 websites by this Forum on my postings that do not help me or public. Editor may help to ensure that discussions such as these are not hosted as websites in Internet.

3. Members should encourage original findings/breakthroughs in any possible way. On my postings, criticism was made without going through the actual work done (websites ). I would invite adverse as well as good comments on the actual work done. I still await fruitful comments, if any, from members on my postings. If this is possible, it would encourage me further postings and other senior scientists like me to join these esteemed Forum.

Professor M.A.Padmanabha Rao

[Tormod]

The search you mention is our index of external sites. It was displayed first because it matches the exact phrase you used on the top of your page.

It is in no more way a citation than a Google hit would be! So the one who is claiming that your work is original is you. Don't get me wrong - I have never said they are not correct. But please do not attempt to put Hypography in a position where we stand by the quality of anyone's work without our consent.

I have noted your points and will answer them in this way:

1) We use nicknames as we please. This is a forum open for all and as such we respect anyone's wish to remain anonymous. We do however still require evidence or supportive data for claims made. We are NOT all scientists here. Most of us are laypeople with a deep interest in science.

2) It is not my job as an editor to decide which posts help or do not help anyone. If you are being asked to prove your credibility, then the best thing to do is to comply by showing us evidence for it. A simple link to a phone directory at your insitute would be fine. As noted in point 1 above, we allow anyone to be anonymous. How can we then know that you are who you claim to be?

3) Yes. I fully agree on this point, however, I think some of our members actually DID read your articles and did not find them satisfyingly documented. That was how I understood their posts.

Don't get me wrong. You are very welcome here at Hypography and you are free to post as you wish. But do not mistake this for a peer reviewed journal. Members here range from high school students to retired people, from all walks of life, from 20 different countries. So we are very much a gathering of more or less learned amateurs.

[M.A.Padmanabha Rao]

Originally Posted by Tormod

The search you mention is our index of external sites. It was displayed first because it matches the exact phrase you used on the top of your page.

Thanks for your prompt reply. Your comment "How can we then know that you are who you claim to be?" is very interesting.

I am currently in USA. It does not help me proving that I am the same Dr.M.A.Padmanabha Rao, who claimed six fundamental physics discoveries.

Once again I thank you for all the cooperation you have shown after admitting me as member.

M.A.Padmanabha Rao
raomap@yahoo.com

[gccbhu]

if phy & math. forum realy want to help the researchers , please help me in the following questions
1-What is the logical ans for 'gravity is not the inverse square low forse'.?
2-how can we visualise the forth dimension of time ,orthogonal w.r.t. space?
3-how can we calculate the value of Gmn (g mun ,nue) for orthogonal and oblique systems of axis?

[M.A.Padmanabha Rao]

Originally Posted by gccbhu

if phy & math. forum realy want to help the researchers , please help me in the following questions
1-What is the logical ans for 'gravity is not the inverse square low forse'.?
2-how can we visualise the forth dimension of time ,orthogonal w.r.t. space?
3-how can we calculate the value of Gmn (g mun ,nue) for orthogonal and oblique systems of axis?

Presently, I am probing on fundamental forces like electric force, magnetic and gravitational forces. Sometimes, new and better information do occur when deeply thought on any aspect that may differ from the current beliefs. In such cases, it would be impossible to convince our fellow scientists. This happened with me in the case of my six fundamental physics discoveries. Any how, within a couple of months I may better understand these forces.

I have working or expert knowledge on around 30 subjects of physical and medical sciences; and advanced science of yoga. But I have not worked on the other two aspects.

M.A.Padmanabha Rao

[Turtle]

Sup Pad? Have you checked threads on Strange Numbers & Katabatak math? You may there find some solutions/models for that which you are trying to discover. I got to meet Yoga at a Star Wars convention in Las Vegas; he's really very nice in real life.
My small page: http://home.comcast.net/~turtlediable/wsb/index.html