 |
|
02-25-2005
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Thinking
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Measuring out 10 quarts
Three jars contain 19, 13, and 7 quarts, respectively. The first is empty, the others full. How can one measure out 10 quarts, using no other vessels?
You cannot approximate, i.e. you cannot fill the 19 quart jar halfway judging by sight. The solution must be an easy and organized one. All work must be shown.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I got an answer, but one has to hold his finger to the jar in order to keep track of where the waterline was before he poured more water in it... Blah blah blah, basically, it's shaky. So I would greatly appreciate any help. Thanks guys!
- Alisa
----------------
"Physics is like sex. Sure, it may give some practical results, but that's not why we do it." - R. Feynman

|
|
|
02-25-2005
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Coincidence of Molecules
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Measuring out 10 quarts
19 13 7
19 13 0
19 6 7
19 6 0
19 0 6
18 0 7
18 7 0
12 13 0
12 6 7
5 13 7
18 0 7
18 0 0
5 13 0
0 13 5
0 11 7
7 11 0
7 4 7
14 4 0
11 13 0
11 6 7
11 6 0
11 0 6
10 0 7
10 0 0
Perhaps there may be a shorter way.....but here's one.....
----------------
Don't walk behind me; I may not lead. Don't walk in front of me; I may not follow. Just walk beside me and be my friend.
Albert Camus
|
|
|
02-25-2005
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Hypographer
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Measuring out 10 quarts
But doesn't it start out at 0 13 7?
----------------
Your Friendly Neighborhood Administrator
Want to lose the advertisements? Become a Sponsor!
Join our Facebook group or follow us on Twitter
Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality.
- Carl Sagan
|
|
|
02-25-2005
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Coincidence of Molecules
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Measuring out 10 quarts
Oops.... I guess I need to learn to read better..... 
----------------
Don't walk behind me; I may not lead. Don't walk in front of me; I may not follow. Just walk beside me and be my friend.
Albert Camus
|
|
|
02-25-2005
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Thinking
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Measuring out 10 quarts
Yeah, it starts out with 0,13,7, so 20 quarts total. Blah I still can't get it without having to mark off water levels, and I'm not sure if that's allowed. = /
Thanks for the help, though.
- Alisa
----------------
"Physics is like sex. Sure, it may give some practical results, but that's not why we do it." - R. Feynman

|
|
|
02-25-2005
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Percipient

Sponsor |
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Measuring out 10 quarts
___I think I can do this. You must pour back & forth in a certain order. 
----------------
semantics is not always just pedantic quibbling. ~ douglas r. hofstadter
|
|
|
02-25-2005
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
¿42?
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Measuring out 10 quarts
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DivineNathicana
Three jars contain 19, 13, and 7 quarts, respectively. The first is empty, the others full. How can one measure out 10 quarts, using no other vessels?
You cannot approximate, i.e. you cannot fill the 19 quart jar halfway judging by sight. The solution must be an easy and organized one. All work must be shown.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I got an answer, but one has to hold his finger to the jar in order to keep track of where the waterline was before he poured more water in it... Blah blah blah, basically, it's shaky. So I would greatly appreciate any help. Thanks guys!
- Alisa
|
Here is one solution. Poor back and forth as follows:
Code:
0 13 7
13 0 7
13 7 0
6 7 7
6 13 1
19 0 1
19 1 0
12 1 7
12 8 0
5 8 7
5 13 2
18 0 2
18 2 0
11 2 7
11 9 0
4 9 7
4 13 3
17 0 3
17 3 0
10 3 7
----------------
Clay
Editor and Forum Administrator
stego anyone?
Add yourself to Hypography's Frappr.
"There are only 10 kinds of people in the world --
.....Those who understand binary, and those who don't."
"Draw no conclusions before their time."
|
|
|
02-25-2005
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Percipient

Sponsor |
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Measuring out 10 quarts
___Nice! Now I don't have to bother. 
----------------
semantics is not always just pedantic quibbling. ~ douglas r. hofstadter
|
|
|
02-25-2005
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Thinking
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Measuring out 10 quarts
Thanks! I'll go try that out.
----------------
"Physics is like sex. Sure, it may give some practical results, but that's not why we do it." - R. Feynman

|
|
|
02-26-2005
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Percipient

Sponsor |
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Measuring out 10 quarts
___If you like counting problems, I refer you to a real world counting problem I set forth in the thread "Mathemagical Box". I have presented there sufficient information for you to arrive at a solution. A solution I have not bothered to find (yet). I entertain your solutions dear Reader. 
----------------
semantics is not always just pedantic quibbling. ~ douglas r. hofstadter
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
|
» Advertisement |
|
|
|