like tormod said: if you diddn't understood my post you will have a very hard time proving the riemann hypothesis (remember that this is a problem where in the past century the smartest mathematiciens in the world have worked on...)
Well let's see if i can be more clearly:
Quote:
|
the Rieman zeta function isgiven by: f(s)= sum(n=0 to inf) n^(-s).
|
so this is a function f, that depends on some complex number s (complex numbers are numbers with a real and an imaginary component). This function is given by an infinite sum n^(-s) (^means 'to the power of'). so the first components of this sum are:
n=0 --> 0^(-s) =0
n=1 --> 1^(-s)
n=2 --> 2^(-s)
etc.
so f(s) is given by 0+1^(-s)+2^(-s)+.... etc until infinity.
The riemann hypothesis is that the euation f(s)=0, holds if the real part of s is 1/2.
Bo