Go Back   Science Forums > Physical Sciences Forums > Physics and Mathematics
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-30-2009   #21 (permalink)
UncleAl's Avatar
Creating


Location:
Southern California, USA
 
UncleAl has a reputation beyond reputeUncleAl has a reputation beyond reputeUncleAl has a reputation beyond reputeUncleAl has a reputation beyond reputeUncleAl has a reputation beyond reputeUncleAl has a reputation beyond reputeUncleAl has a reputation beyond reputeUncleAl has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: This question

If gravitational and inertial masses of a body diverged, General Relativity would have a falsified founding postulate (the Equivalence Principle). Breaking General Relativity should be good for a Nobel Prize/Physics. One presumes this highlights the enormity of the task.


----------------
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm
Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2009   #22 (permalink)
maddog's Avatar
Creating


Location:
Akron, OH
 
maddog has much to be proud ofmaddog has much to be proud ofmaddog has much to be proud ofmaddog has much to be proud ofmaddog has much to be proud ofmaddog has much to be proud ofmaddog has much to be proud of
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Talking Re: This question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben View Post
I am confused! Suppose I sit atop a photon as it leaves Sol, and time how long it takes me to get to Earth, what will my clock read on arrival? Zero? Infinity? I don't think so. I suspect I will have timed it at roughly 8 minutes.
Am I wrong?
Depends. Were you to sit on the photon. Your watch is stopped. Were you see the photon
as it left the surface of the Sun via reflection (initial time) and to travel on it's original
path to the Earth. You could then signal to a partner (in communication with) on the
Earth, who would capture that said photon -- yes, 8 minutes later.

The difference is Special Relativity (SR). It depends where you are in the observation.

maddog
Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2009   #23 (permalink)
maddog's Avatar
Creating


Location:
Akron, OH
 
maddog has much to be proud ofmaddog has much to be proud ofmaddog has much to be proud ofmaddog has much to be proud ofmaddog has much to be proud ofmaddog has much to be proud ofmaddog has much to be proud of
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Cool Re: This question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay-qu View Post
Sorry but this question is flawed.

Since inertia implies motion and all motion is relative, you only have inertia relative to something else. Therefore when you say 'negate' you would have to say 'equate' your inertia with some other object, this would make you stationary in that frame only.

Then making many such negations of inertia between reference frames would essentially be performing Lorentz boosts between reference frames, with infinite acceleration.
As I misunderstood earlier, I think the originator of this thread was thinking like Author of
the Sci Fi series I mentioned, Doc E.E. Smith -- Lensman series. That was the propulsion
of the spacecraft in the series was based upon an "inertialess" drive. Note: this was fiction. Somehow when the drive operated, the mass of the craft lost "all inertia" in "all
reference frames". I am not saying this would obey any laws of physics. This is fiction.

You can make up what you want. It's behavior would be as described, acceleration at
the slightest touch.

Lawrence Krauss wrote a book about the Physics of Star Trek. Maybe someone needs to
write a book on the Physics of Super Heroes. Hmmm.

maddog
Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2009   #24 (permalink)
lemit's Avatar
Exploring

Junior Moderator
Senior Editor
Editor
Platinum Subscription
Sponsor

Location:
Balloon Boy Land
 
lemit has a reputation beyond reputelemit has a reputation beyond reputelemit has a reputation beyond reputelemit has a reputation beyond reputelemit has a reputation beyond reputelemit has a reputation beyond reputelemit has a reputation beyond reputelemit has a reputation beyond reputelemit has a reputation beyond reputelemit has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: This question

This is a science site, isn't it? I thought that in the "Hypography Superhero Series" (Tormod?) all the superheroes would be required to obey the established laws of physics. That would be what made them special.

--lemit


----------------


The only second chance we get in life is a chance to make the same mistake twice. --David Mamet

A mind is a terrible thing to close.

Entropy is just nature's way of telling us it's time to slow down.
Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2009   #25 (permalink)
TheBigDog's Avatar
Doing the Impossible

Moderator
Gallery Curator

Location:
Madison, OH (when not in fantasy land)
 
TheBigDog has a reputation beyond reputeTheBigDog has a reputation beyond reputeTheBigDog has a reputation beyond reputeTheBigDog has a reputation beyond reputeTheBigDog has a reputation beyond reputeTheBigDog has a reputation beyond reputeTheBigDog has a reputation beyond reputeTheBigDog has a reputation beyond reputeTheBigDog has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via MSN to TheBigDog
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: This question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pyrotex View Post
Yup, you're absolutely right!

So our superhero opens the front door,
gets hit by sunlight,
immediately accellerates to the speed of light,
immediately is stopped by a carbon dioxide molecule,
gets hit by sunlight,
immediately accellerates to the speed of light,
immediately is stopped by an oxygen molecule,
gets hit by sunlight,
immediately accellerates to the speed of light,
immediately is stopped by a nitrogen molecule,
gets hit by sunlight,
immediately accellerates to the speed of light,
immediately is stopped by a dust particle,
...
I had been thinking along these same lines recently, although not as inertia, I was thinking of a person with variable mass. Imagine you had a throttle that could control your inertia from near zero to near infinite. So you could ride a beam of light, or be an immovable object. You could become lighter than air and fly, or become heavier than a building and collapse a bridge. Now there is a superhero!

Bill


----------------
aka TheBigDog - Hypography Full Freaking Moderator
Become a Hypography sponsor!
The truth is incontravertible; malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end there it is. - Winston Churchill

TheBigDog's recommended reading: The Science of Success - Charles G. Koch

A neutron goes into a bar and asks the bartender, "How much for a beer?"
The bartender replies, "For you, no charge."
Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2009   #26 (permalink)
lemit's Avatar
Exploring

Junior Moderator
Senior Editor
Editor
Platinum Subscription
Sponsor

Location:
Balloon Boy Land
 
lemit has a reputation beyond reputelemit has a reputation beyond reputelemit has a reputation beyond reputelemit has a reputation beyond reputelemit has a reputation beyond reputelemit has a reputation beyond reputelemit has a reputation beyond reputelemit has a reputation beyond reputelemit has a reputation beyond reputelemit has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: This question

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBigDog View Post
I had been thinking along these same lines recently, although not as inertia, I was thinking of a person with variable mass. Imagine you had a throttle that could control your inertia from near zero to near infinite. So you could ride a beam of light, or be an immovable object. You could become lighter than air and fly, or become heavier than a building and collapse a bridge. Now there is a superhero!

Bill
I think you may have violated copyright of a few Broadway musicals there, but you've probably also created a superhero I can't immediately debunk, and who probably could be realized as a character.

I can actually see that as a cartoon. That doesn't usually happen.

And you've already got some lyrics for a theme song.

--lemit


----------------


The only second chance we get in life is a chance to make the same mistake twice. --David Mamet

A mind is a terrible thing to close.

Entropy is just nature's way of telling us it's time to slow down.
Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2009   #27 (permalink)
Don Blazys's Avatar
Questioning


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: This question

Our superhero needs a name.

How about "MASSMAN" !?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
One question????? buddyzen Theology forum 4 01-22-2009 09:40 PM
And the question is... coberst Philosophy Forums 6 11-02-2006 10:29 AM
Question - Tba theblackalchemist Physics and Mathematics 5 09-28-2006 01:21 PM
Question? Little Bang Physics and Mathematics 8 09-27-2006 12:16 AM
question... Drip Curl Magic Chess Forum 9 12-11-2005 10:25 AM

» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 27.27%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 45.45%
5 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 27.27%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:59 AM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network