Go Back   Science Forums > Physical Sciences Forums > Physics and Mathematics
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 6 Days Ago   #31 (permalink)
CraigD's Avatar
Creating

Administrator
Editor

Location:
Silver Spring, MD, USA
 
CraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Red face I think we have a consensus ... and I have a question

I think this thread has managed to answer the original question, which I paraphrase
does General Relativity state that it’s impossible to distinguish an isolated room subjected to constant acceleration from one subject to gravitational acceleration?
After trying both possible answers – yes and no – I believe we’ve shown the answer is
no, for any room with non-zero height, it’s possible to distinguish forces due to gravity from forces due to the room’s acceleration.
There are many ways to state this, some involving the terms “equivalence principle” “infinitesimal” and “tidal force”, but all describe, I think, the same underlying principle.

Simple as this is, I’ve long had a problem applying it. In particular, describing what an un-accelerated observer would observe an accurate clock on a body under acceleration to read relative to his own accurate clock, where both have small masses, and are far from large-mass bodies.

Consider two spaceships far from any star or planet. Initially, A has a velocity of 1000 m/s nearly directly toward B. The distance between A and B is 5000 m. A has an acceleration of 100 m/s/s (a bit over 10 gs). After 10 seconds, A and B are near one another, with relative velocity 0.

Around that instant, what rate relative to his accurate clock would an observer on B observe of an accurate clock on A?

The formula for gravitational time dilation in an accelerated box,
T_d = e^{a h /c^2}
, appears at many reference websites, including this wikipedia page. a is acceleration, but h is “is the ‘vertical’ distance between the observers”, which I’m unable to understand.

Does anyone know how to calculate the answer to the question above?


----------------
Moderator: Computers and Technology; Medical Science; Science Projects and Homework; Philosophy of Science; Physics and Mathematics; Environmental Studies
Reply With Quote
Old 6 Days Ago   #32 (permalink)
Qfwfq's Avatar
Exhausted Gondolier

Administrator

Location:
Floating On An Ocean Of Hydrogen
 
Qfwfq has a reputation beyond reputeQfwfq has a reputation beyond reputeQfwfq has a reputation beyond reputeQfwfq has a reputation beyond reputeQfwfq has a reputation beyond reputeQfwfq has a reputation beyond reputeQfwfq has a reputation beyond reputeQfwfq has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: I think we have a consensus ... and I have a question

Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigD View Post
Simple as this is, I’ve long had a problem applying it. In particular, describing what an un-accelerated observer would observe an accurate clock on a body under acceleration to read relative to his own accurate clock, where both have small masses, and are far from large-mass bodies.

Consider two spaceships far from any star or planet. Initially, A has a velocity of 1000 m/s nearly directly toward B. The distance between A and B is 5000 m. A has an acceleration of 100 m/s/s (a bit over 10 gs). After 10 seconds, A and B are near one another, with relative velocity 0.

Around that instant, what rate relative to his accurate clock would an observer on B observe of an accurate clock on A?
Strictly, this is not a problem of GR, it is SR. At that instant, dt'=dt. From the inertial rest frame, the ratio \frac{dt'}{dt} is just according to the usual formula with the instantaneous value of v^2, you can even calculate for a finite interval by integrating the same formula with the time dependance v^2(t).

Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigD View Post
The formula for gravitational time dilation in an accelerated box,
T_d = e^{a h /c^2}
, appears at many reference websites, including this wikipedia page. a is acceleration, but h is “is the ‘vertical’ distance between the observers”, which I’m unable to understand.
Gee that section is rather poorly worded. Here, the observers are mutually at rest so both have the same velocity. The h is simply their distance according to the direction of the acceleration and the numerator in the exponent is just the potential difference for a uniform field (and the denominator of course is due if units aren't natural). The exponential simply maps an additive comparison onto a multiplicative one because you want the ratio \frac{\Delta t'}{\Delta t} (no integration is necessary).


----------------
Inutil insegnà al mus, si piart timp, in plui si infastidìs la bestie.

Hypography Forum PITA...... er, Administrator.
Reply With Quote
Thanks from:
modest (5 Days Ago)
Old 6 Days Ago   #33 (permalink)
modest's Avatar
Creating

Moderator

Location:
U.S. Midwest
 
modest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: I think we have a consensus ... and I have a question

Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigD View Post
After 10 seconds, A and B are near one another, with relative velocity 0.

Around that instant, what rate relative to his accurate clock would an observer on B observe of an accurate clock on A?
At that instant neither are accelerating nor have relative velocity,so t = T. No difference in rate. But, I think you mean, what is the rate during the acceleration...? But the rate changes. Because A is accelerating and B is not accelerating there is not a constant difference in rates. The velocity between the two changes so time dilation comes from acceleration and velocity. The equation:
T_d = e^{a h /c^2}
only works if the distance between them (h) is always the same. That is, if both A and B were accelerating at the same rate, in the same direction, then the equation above would give the time dilation between them, where h is the distance between them.

If you want to find the difference in time for your whole thought experiment, from start to finish, between the two you can use the relativistic rock equation. If the trip takes exactly 10 seconds from A's perspective then B's clock would advance:
t=\sqrt{\left( \frac{d}{c} \right) ^2 + \frac{2d}{a} }  =   \sqrt{\left( \frac{5000}{299792458} \right) ^2 + \frac{2 \cdot 5000}{100} }  = 10.0000000000139 \ s
~modest


----------------

Last edited by modest; 6 Days Ago at 11:53 AM..
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Up to, equivalence and mod. (Read at your peril) Ben Physics and Mathematics 12 10-20-2009 04:39 AM
The Anthropic Principle Under Fire Tormod Science News 50 01-18-2008 07:59 PM
Ethanol/ULP Mixes and Mileage Equivalence LaurieAG Engineering and Applied Science 3 10-05-2007 06:31 PM
A way around the Uncertainity principle ktpr Physics and Mathematics 4 10-04-2004 02:23 PM

» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 27.27%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 45.45%
5 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 27.27%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:48 PM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network