Go Back   Science Forums > Physical Sciences Forums > Physics and Mathematics
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-16-2005   #1 (permalink)
quantum quack's Avatar
Thinking


 
quantum quack is an unknown quantity at this point
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
When 1+1 = 1 - philosophical physics

I am not sure how to start this discussion on this observation but I'll give it a go any way....
IN essence it is a physical representation of a deeper philosophical question about oneness yet simultaneously maintaining separateness, however I put it forward as a question of physics in this post.

Basically if we take pressure or the absence of pressure as an example.
Say for example we have 2 cubic 1 meter vacuum chambers and we vacate them to say, -10 units of pressure relative to the pressure outside the chamber.
We now add these two volumes of space together and we still have -10 units of pressure.

However if we invert the scenario and make two chambers of +10 units of pressure, when we add them [the two volumes of space] together what do we have as the sum of both chambers?

My guess is we have +20 units

so in one case two volumes of vacuum equal the same value in pressure where as two volumes of pressure equals the sum of both volumes [addition]

Now if we consider that both the negative and positive volumes are essentially the same volume [ and pressure ] and only seen from different perspectives we have a seemingly paradoxical result.

When looking at it from an ambient pressure perspective we have 1+1=1 and when looking at it from an ambient vacuum, perspective we have 1+1=2.

Thus this can be logically exteded to mean philosophically 0+0 = 0 but also 0+0 = 1 simultaneously.

Does this make any sense at all?

Last edited by quantum quack; 07-16-2005 at 08:08 PM..
Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2005   #2 (permalink)
EWright's Avatar
Understanding


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: When 1+1 = 1 - philosophical physics

Quote:
Originally Posted by quantum quack
I am not sure how to start this discussion on this observation but I'll give it a go any way....
IN essence it is a physical representation of a deeper philosophical question about oneness yet simultaneously maintaining separateness, however I put it forward as a question of physics in this post.

Basically if we take pressure or the absence of pressure as an example.
Say for example we have 2 cubic 1 meter vacuum chambers and we vacate them to say, -10 units of pressure relative to the pressure outside the chamber.
We now add these two volumes of space together and we still have -10 units of pressure.

However if we invert the scenario and make two chambers of +10 units of pressure, when we add them [the two volumes of space] together what do we have as the sum of both chambers?

My guess is we have +20 units

so in one case two volumes of vacuum equal the same value in pressure where as two volumes of pressure equals the sum of both volumes [addition]

Now if we consider that both the negative and positive volumes are essentially the same volume [ and pressure ] and only seen from different perspectives we have a seemingly paradoxical result.

When looking at it from a pressure perspective we have 1+1=1 and when looking at it from a vacuum, perspective we have 1+1=2.

Thus this can be logically exteded to mean philosophically 0+0 = 0 but also 0+0 = 1 simultaneously.

Does this make any sense at all?
This is not an area I have ever focused on or taken interest in, but logically ti seems to me that you are mistaken. Try looking at it as a ratio/proportion issue. In both cases your ratio remins 1:1. When you are adding the positive relationships together, your adding the same amount of volume as you are pressure, so the ratio remains the same per unit of measurement.
Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2005   #3 (permalink)
quantum quack's Avatar
Thinking


 
quantum quack is an unknown quantity at this point
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: When 1+1 = 1 - philosophical physics

Quote:
Originally Posted by EWright
This is not an area I have ever focused on or taken interest in, but logically ti seems to me that you are mistaken. Try looking at it as a ratio/proportion issue. In both cases your ratio remins 1:1. When you are adding the positive relationships together, your adding the same amount of volume as you are pressure, so the ratio remains the same per unit of measurement.
let me try another approach.....

If I take a container of 10 psi and squeeze that volume into a similar container with 10 psi I have a result of 20 psi....yes? Can we agree with this? [the way a pump functions]

If I take a container with -10 psi and squeeze that volume into a similar contaiiner with -10 psi I would expect a result of only -10 psi...would this be correct? Can we agree with this?

btw thanks for your response

Last edited by quantum quack; 07-16-2005 at 08:39 PM..
Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2005   #4 (permalink)
quantum quack's Avatar
Thinking


 
quantum quack is an unknown quantity at this point
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: When 1+1 = 1 - philosophical physics

just to add
say we use the following
where
v = volume of vacuum
and
p = volume of pressure

1v + 1v = 1v
1p + 1p = 2p

Where pressure is a relative concept

Last edited by quantum quack; 07-16-2005 at 08:36 PM..
Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2005   #5 (permalink)
EWright's Avatar
Understanding


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: When 1+1 = 1 - philosophical physics

Quote:
Originally Posted by quantum quack
let me try another approach.....

If I take a container of 10 psi and squeeze that volume into a similar container with 10 psi I have a result of 20 psi....yes? Can we agree with this? [the way a pump functions]

If I take a container with -10 psi and squeeze that volume into a similar contaiiner with -10 psi I would expect a result of only -10 psi...would this be correct? Can we agree with this?

btw thanks for your response
No, you would have -20psi in the container smaller container. Consider two glasses upside down in a container of water with an inch of air caught in each one. If you release the air from one glass into the other you will now have two inches of air (negative pressure in this case) in the second glass. It remains negatively proportional to its positive counterpart.
Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2005   #6 (permalink)
EWright's Avatar
Understanding


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: When 1+1 = 1 - philosophical physics

Quote:
Originally Posted by quantum quack
just to add
say we use the following
where
v = volume of vacuum
and
p = volume of pressure

1v + 1v = 1v
1p + 1p = 2p

Where pressure is a relative concept
You will then have two units of pressure (be it negative or positive) in one unit of volume. You actually have 2v - 1v = 1v and 1p + 1p = 2p. Holy cow, I think I actually just spoke physics!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2005   #7 (permalink)
quantum quack's Avatar
Thinking


 
quantum quack is an unknown quantity at this point
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: When 1+1 = 1 - philosophical physics

Quote:
Originally Posted by EWright
You will then have two units of pressure (be it negative or positive) in one unit of volume. You actually have 2v - 1v = 1v and 1p + 1p = 2p. Holy cow, I think I actually just spoke physics!
it is true if you are talkking about the number of volumes. But we are talking about the value of pressure when combining volumes.....i think
Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2005   #8 (permalink)
EWright's Avatar
Understanding


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: When 1+1 = 1 - philosophical physics

Quote:
Originally Posted by quantum quack
it is true if you are talkking about the number of volumes. But we are talking about the value of pressure when combining volumes.....i think
I thought so too.

I think I'm still correct though. The pressure volumes would be combined either negatively or positively, no?
Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2005   #9 (permalink)
quantum quack's Avatar
Thinking


 
quantum quack is an unknown quantity at this point
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: When 1+1 = 1 - philosophical physics

Quote:
Originally Posted by EWright
I thought so too.

I think I'm still correct though. The pressure volumes would be combined either negatively or positively, no?

I guess it comes down to teh basic question of what happens if you add
-10 units of pressure to -10 units of pressure?

does it equal -20 units or -10 units?

keeping in mind that adding a volume of vacuum does not increase the vacuum unless the negative pressure is greater [lesser] than the original pressure.....hmmmmm
this is my premise
10 v + 13v = 13v
it would only take 13 v to combine the two volumes

however 10 p + 13p = 23p
it would tke 23 p to combine the two volumes

Last edited by quantum quack; 07-16-2005 at 09:21 PM..
Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2005   #10 (permalink)
EWright's Avatar
Understanding


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: When 1+1 = 1 - philosophical physics

Quote:
Originally Posted by quantum quack
I guess it comes down to teh basic question of what happens if you add
-10 units of pressure to -10 units of pressure?

does it equal -20 units or -10 units?

keeping in mind that adding a volume of vacuum does not increase the vacuum unless the negative pressure is greater [lesser] than the original pressure.....hmmmmm
this is my premise
10 v + 13v = 13v
it would only take 13 v to combine the two volumes

however 10 p + 13p = 23p
it would tke 23 p to combine the two volumes
Going back to my upside down glasses of water scenario, you do get increased negative pressure, which is doubled relative to what it was and the corresponding equal amount of positive pressure is displaced by the new negative pressure. Right?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 27.27%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 45.45%
5 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 27.27%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:58 AM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network