Physics and Mathematics Formulae, ideas, theories, speed of light, black holes...


Advertisement (please log in or register to remove this ad)
Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-11-2005, 07:44 AM
Curious
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3
Untergang is an unknown quantity at this point
Post Rate of Speed?

Ok, so my friend and I were arguing whether or not all object, in the same shape, will fall at the same speed and he says they will, but I don't think so. Wouldn't the density of the object have a huge impact on the velocity of the object aswell as the acceleration rate? (the argument was between a square block of led and a square block of feathers.
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-11-2005, 07:50 AM
Tormod's Avatar
Hypographer
Points: 117,129, Level: 100 Points: 117,129, Level: 100 Points: 117,129, Level: 100
Activity: 41% Activity: 41% Activity: 41%
Hypography Staff Member
Administrator
Senior Editor
Editor
Dev Team Member
 
2D Memory Champion!
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 12,626
Tormod has a brilliant futureTormod has a brilliant futureTormod has a brilliant futureTormod has a brilliant futureTormod has a brilliant futureTormod has a brilliant futureTormod has a brilliant futureTormod has a brilliant futureTormod has a brilliant futureTormod has a brilliant future
Re: Rate of Speed?

Your view is the Aristotelian view. Galileo Galilei proved that objects *regardless of weight* fall at the same rate *except* for air friction. The density has nothing to do with the speed if the objects fall in vacuum.

However, on Earth a feather will fall slower than a rock because the feather is obstructed by the atmosphere. If you pack each of the items into two equal plastic bags then the problem more or less disappears (there will still be measureable friction for the lighter bag).

(BTW what is a square block of feathers?)
__________________
Your Friendly Neighborhood Administrator

Found a problem? Report it in our Bug Tracker

Want to sponsor Hypography? Use our Amazon affiliate bookstore when you buy books!

Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality.
- Carl Sagan
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-11-2005, 08:07 AM
Qfwfq's Avatar
Exhausted Gondolier
Points: 40,311, Level: 88 Points: 40,311, Level: 88 Points: 40,311, Level: 88
Activity: 2% Activity: 2% Activity: 2%
Hypography Staff Member
Administrator
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: the fringes of the lagoon
Posts: 4,316
Qfwfq is a splendid one to beholdQfwfq is a splendid one to beholdQfwfq is a splendid one to beholdQfwfq is a splendid one to beholdQfwfq is a splendid one to beholdQfwfq is a splendid one to beholdQfwfq is a splendid one to beholdQfwfq is a splendid one to behold
Re: Rate of Speed?

Cubic, I guess.

He must be reasoning on the terminal velocity.
__________________
The velocity of light in vacuo is c, but c isn't just the velocity of light.

Inutil insegnà al mus, si piart timp, in plui si infastidìs la bestie.

Everything that ever was is a song that is sung into existence.
orbsycli.

Hypography Forum PITA...... er, Moderator.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-11-2005, 08:20 AM
Curious
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3
Untergang is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Rate of Speed?

By a block of feathers I was just trying to exagerate that they were the same shape but different density.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08-11-2005, 04:52 PM
Thinking
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 14
Greg_G47 is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Greg_G47
Re: Rate of Speed?

well, we could be really picky and say you're right and that heavier objects do fall faster.

f = Gm1m2/r^2 so the total acceleration due to gravity of two objects falling towards each other is equal to (Gm1m2/r^2)/m1 + (Gm1m2/r^2)/m2 or (Gm1+Gm2)/r^2

You wouldn't notice that difference though unless you were dropping say... the moon and a baseball. Most of the time we assume that m1 is the mass of earth and m2 is the mass of the falling object, Gm2 is comparatively very small so we ignore it. This means we're left with G times the mass of earth divided by the radius of earth squared (since we're usually not too far off the surface) and that gives the acceleration of ~9.81m/s^2 which works for most "reasonable" objects.

Of course there's still wind resistance. The faster you go the stronger it gets until the acceleration due to gravity equals the acceleration (in the opposite direction) due to banging into air molecules. At this point the speed of the object stays constant as long as atmospheric conditions do. This is called terminal velocity and it varies depending on the shape, size and mass of the object. different or larger shapes/sizes bang into more air creating more air resistance, causing them to fall slower than other objects of similar mass (parachute versus 30lb dumbell), and heavier objects of similar size create more downward force with the same acceleration (f=ma) thus they may fall faster (parachute versus elephant).

And that's just about everything I can think to tell you about dropping things. Hope it helps.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
Advertisement


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why Does Time Fly? Antti Astronomy and Cosmology 60 03-09-2008
If the Speed of Light changed, would we even notice it. WebFeet Astronomy and Cosmology 95 04-07-2007
The Theory of Special Relativity for the Totally Confused Beginner Damo2600 Strange claims forum 30 08-04-2006
Beyond the Singularity pihunter Astronomy and Cosmology 3 03-08-2005
Speed of Gravity and Speed of Light thoughts and ponderings... Noah Physics and Mathematics 9 12-22-2003

» Advertisement
» Latest Science News
A Fine-Tooth Comb To Measure The Accelerating Universe
imageAstronomical instruments needed to answer crucial questions, such as the search for Earth-like planets or the way the Universe expands, have come a step closer with the first demonstration at the telescope of a new calibration system for precise spectrographs. The method uses a Nobel Prize-winning technology called a 'laser frequency comb', and is published in this week's issue of Science.
Read » | 0 comments

Fermilab physicists discover "doubly strange" particle
imagePhysicists of the DZero experiment at the U.S. Department of Energy's Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory have discovered a new particle made of three quarks, the Omega-sub-b (Ωb). The particle contains two strange quarks and a bottom quark (s-s-b). It is an exotic relative of the much more common proton and weighs about six times the proton mass.
Read » | 0 comments

Stanford's 'autonomous' helicopters teach themselves to fly
imageStanford computer scientists have developed an artificial intelligence system that enables robotic helicopters to teach themselves to fly difficult stunts by watching other helicopters perform the same maneuvers. The result is an autonomous helicopter than can perform a complete airshow of complex tricks on its own.
Read » | 0 comments
» Current Poll
Do U text?
No - 35.29%
12 Votes
Yes; < 6 messages/day - 41.18%
14 Votes
Yes; 6-15 messages/day - 11.76%
4 Votes
Yes; 16 to 43 messages/day - 5.88%
2 Votes
Yes; > 43 messages/day - 2.94%
1 Vote
What? - 2.94%
1 Vote
Total Votes: 34
You may not vote on this poll.
» Random Social Groups
Photographers
10 members | 66 pictures
The Atheist Club
9 members | 2 pictures
WHO BELIEVES IN UFO?
4 members | 28 pictures
Hypography jugglers
5 members | 7 pictures
Hackers
8 members | 0 pictures
» View All Groups
Advertisement

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2000-2008 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network