Special Relativity

[HydrogenBond]

If one plots the special relativity gammer velocity for mass, distance and time, as three axis on a 3-D grid, from 0 to C, the following figure results. (000) is (Vm=0, Vd=0, Vt=0); (C00) is (Vm=C, Vd=0, Vt=0), etc. This plotting arrangment was used because whereas gamma leads to infinity and nebulus boundries, gamma velocity is constrained from 0 to C and therefore has very definitive boundries.



If one looks closely these apex points are the eight singularities of physics. The definite boundires due to plotting gamma velocity allows these singularities to be explained in terms of 0 and C. I will do two; the black hole. Its high gravity is indicative of extreme mass density (Vm=C) its point size implies Vd=0 while its long life stability implies Vt=C. The mass point singularity; It has extreme mass Vm=C, it was very small Vd=0 and only lasted an instant Vt=0.



A more detailed special relativity cube analysis can be found at http://makarewicz.clearwire.net/Spec...Relativity.htm. The edges of the cube define the forces of nature, space and relativistic reference. While the faces of the cube define energy at C and a complementary zero velocity refererence. What this plotting schema suggests is that special relativity style effects can occur as three separate parameters.

Currently one assumes all three, mass, distance and time have to change together in proportion to one gamma velocity. But if one plots that, one only gets a single line from (000) to (CCC) and nothing else. But if we plot them acting separately, all the laws of physics can be plotting and integrated into one graph. The gamma velocites of mass, distance and time, being able to act independantly and/or together might be a third postulate of special relativiity.

[UncleAl]

Illucid. The three variables of physics' space are

1) Planck's constant, h, enforcing uncertainty in measurement, h-bar is the fundamental unit of action;
2) Newton's constant, Big G, scaling gravitation;
3) Lightspeed, c, limiting maximim information transfer rate.

Even if you are feeling perky and have a fine hand for drawing tesseracts, adding Boltzmann's constant defining thermodynamics is redundant. Thermodynamics plus the Bekenstein bound is General Relativity.

? h=h G=G c=infinity
mechanics,
electrostatics: h=zero G=zero c=infinity
classical physics: h=zero G=G c=infinity
quantum mechanics: h=h G=zero c=infinity
special relativity: h=zero G=zero c=c
general relativity: h=zero G=G c=c
quantum field theory: h=h G=zero c=c
Theory of Everything: h=h G=G c=c

[HydrogenBond]

I presented this diagram because it allows one to express theoretical singularities with just C and 0. What it seems to amount to is a diagram of a variety of relativistic references. These references show mass increase, distance contraction and time dilation acting independantly of each other. This is usually not what one expects, but this imtegration only works with the indendance assumption. One good example might be subparticle aggregates like protons. The quarks and gluons can last billions of years within protons. Take them out or put then in other hadrons, and they disappear in a fraction of a second. Could this be time dilation without mass increase or distance contraction since only their time scale changes between these two environments? Mass and distance type properties remain the same. One can then give the proton aggregate velocity such that the aggregate summation now gains mass, distance, time relativity in proportion, with two layers of time dilation and only one layer in mass increase and distance contraction. Take the quarks out of this aggregate than there is only one layer of time dilation and a very short life, i.e, time dilation potential energy is gone. The orignal proton didn't form in the lab but formed at neat the beginning of the universe when time dilation was much higher. It was built to last the life of the universe.