Go Back   Science Forums > Physical Sciences Forums > Physics and Mathematics
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-12-2005   #1 (permalink)
arkain101's Avatar
Creating


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Theory Of Realistic Relativity

Theory was devloped from october 8th to october 11th 2005 by Nicholis Justin Hill as the correction of relativity.

email adress: nickspage99@hotmail.com or/and rblnhill@telus.net

Mailing address
1655 Aveling Coalmine Rd
Telkwa, British Columbia, Canada
V0J 2X3

Phone number
(250)846-5968

Theory was posted here at 6:56pm pacific time October 12th 2005.

Realistic Relativity

Under re-construction

Last edited by arkain101; 10-13-2005 at 01:53 AM.. Reason: re-writing cleaner paper.
Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2005   #2 (permalink)
CraigD's Avatar
Creating

Administrator
Editor

Location:
Silver Spring, MD, USA
 
CraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Correction

Before putting additional work into your paper, Nicholis, let me point out a basic, critical error in Math terminology.

You correctly state the equation for kinetic energy as “E=m*V-squared”, but appear to misunderstand how one calculates it. In you first example, you state that “10 m/s squared” is equal to “20 m/s” – that is, you are interpreting the “squared” operation as meaning “multiplied by 2”, a synonym for “doubled.” This is incorrect. The correct interpretation of “squared” is “raised to the power of 2”, or “multiplied by itself.”. “10 m/s squared”, then, is (10 m/s)^2, which evaluates to 100 m^2/s^2.

Note that the equation Energykinetic = Mass * Velocity^2 derives straightforwardly from the fundamental definitions of mass, distance, time, velocity, force, work and energy. Although this derivation involves some very simple Calculus, it can be easily understood by calculus-free examples. Almost any introductory Physics textbook, printed or online, will provide good explanations of this.

I recommend you study Math and Physics to gain a strong understanding of known theory before working on original theory. Such study is hard work, but cannot be avoided if one seeks to be taken seriously as a scientist. You can count on people here at scienceforums for advice and help in such study, and the discussions here as an informal source of study material.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 27.27%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 45.45%
5 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 27.27%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:21 PM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network