Go Back   Science Forums > Physical Sciences Forums > Physics and Mathematics
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-24-2005   #1 (permalink)
EWright's Avatar
Understanding


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Explosion in a vacuum, help?

Can someone define for me the distribution of matter from an explosion in a vacuum far from any gravitational sources of influence please?
Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2005   #2 (permalink)
Edge's Avatar
Questioning


Location:
Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
 
Edge is on a distinguished road
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Explosion in a vacuum, help?

I don't understand this. Are you talking about implotion?


----------------
"Love is temporary insanity curable by marriage." - Ambrose Bierce

Math: Did we discover or create it?
Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2005   #3 (permalink)
EWright's Avatar
Understanding


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Explosion in a vacuum, help?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Edge
I don't understand this. Are you talking about implotion?

No, a symmetric EXplosion, but in the vacuum of deep space.
Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2005   #4 (permalink)
Erasmus00's Avatar
Creating

Moderator

 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Explosion in a vacuum, help?

Quote:
Originally Posted by EWright
Can someone define for me the distribution of matter from an explosion in a vacuum far from any gravitational sources of influence please?
How powerful is the explosion comparable to the force of gravity? In order to get an answer, I'll take the limit of a very powerful explosion symmetrically scattering lots of very lot particles. Furthermore, lets take the initial shape to be a spherical shell of some radius R. Now, the total mass in our system is constant (in the non-relativistic limit). So, we expect as the shell moves outward that:

4*pi*r^2 *S= M
or
S = M/(4*pi*r^2). Here, M is the total mass, r is the current radius of the shell. S is the mass/area that we are looking for.

If you want the distribution as a function of time, replace r with the velocity of particles and the time. If you want an object with volume instead of a shell, build your sphere out of symmetric shells. Hope that helps.
-Will
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New theories after Einstein Lola Physics and Mathematics 25 07-12-2006 04:22 PM
Fossil find confirms Kauffman and Progogine self organization. Christopher Biology 54 09-01-2005 08:23 PM
Jiggling Mass and Vacuum Space damocles Physics and Mathematics 1 08-15-2005 01:58 PM
Religion, relevant and rational? Stargazer Philosophy Forums 120 04-19-2005 10:01 PM
Cambrian explosion TeleMad Biology 3 03-09-2005 07:38 AM

» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 27.27%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 45.45%
5 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 27.27%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:51 PM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network