I think we're getting confused between objects and images. A mirror's surface would be 2D, seeing as it's a flat plane. Twisted into a funhouse mirror, like Tormod said, would of course make it 3D. The image, however, would be 3D.
Interesting thing I read about a couple of years ago, dunno if it's true, though:
Any n-dimensional image can be represented on an (n-1)-dimensional medium.
For instance, a 2D medium (paper) can be used to show a 3D object (an isometric drawing). And a 3D medium (television) can be used to show 4D stuff. (A TV is 3D, not with the normal x,y and z axis giving it spatial depth, but x,y and time - seeing as there's motion. The z-axis is the illusory one, alluding to a higher dimension...)
And then, if this is true, if we had a true 4D medium, we should be able to picture a 5th dimension. A 4D medium, having x,y,z
and time, would, probably, be a holograph. What the 5th dimension would look like, is anybody's guess, but should be viewable with a holographical projector.
And not viewable as the actual thing, but represented as an isometric drawing would illustrate the third dimension. And once we figure
that out, and can figure out, somehow, how to build a 5D medium, heck - we can view representations of the 6th dimension! And so on...
I don't know wether the above is true, though - I don't know how you're going to represent a 2D image in a 1D medium...
Interesting...
