Go Back   Science Forums > Physical Sciences Forums > Physics and Mathematics
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-08-2006   #1 (permalink)
arkain101's Avatar
Creating


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Space-time:Anti-Space-Time physics model

Those who are members here may be aware I have been working on a new theory for quite some time. I've reached a point where I've began constructing a model.

I look forward to discussing the theory with you all here and working on how valid it is. I am obviously excited but I am just eager to put it to through rigorous testing and questioning.

There will be some time before it is put together clearly for the picking.

Last edited by Jay-qu; 06-15-2006 at 08:44 PM..
Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2006   #2 (permalink)
InfiniteNow's Avatar
Suspended


Location:
Austin, TX
 
InfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Complete Unified Theory Model Developed.

Excellent Arkain. You are clearly excited and proud. I am sure it feels good to have reached a point of transition in your work.


So, this theory... How can we test it? Have you thought of any ways yet that might prove it wrong?

fyi... if it survives those tests, it only makes it stronger.


Cheers. I look forward to seeing more.
Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2006   #3 (permalink)
UncleAl's Avatar
Creating


Location:
Southern California, USA
 
UncleAl has a reputation beyond reputeUncleAl has a reputation beyond reputeUncleAl has a reputation beyond reputeUncleAl has a reputation beyond reputeUncleAl has a reputation beyond reputeUncleAl has a reputation beyond reputeUncleAl has a reputation beyond reputeUncleAl has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Complete Unified Theory Model Developed.

Quote:
-the constant speed of light. Why it is the same in all observable reference frames.
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/analysis.jpg

An invariant lightspeed for all inertial observers is a trivial consequence of Lorentz Invariance. Given any achievable velocities V1 and V2 and any finite lightspeed, the bound on the relative velocities of V1 and V2 as viewed by any inertial observer cannot exceed

(V1 + V2)/[1 +(V1)(V2)/c^2]

This is transformation of velocities parallel to the direction of motion. If you like a full solution for an arbitrary angle theta,

u_parallel = (u'_parallel + v)/(1+(v dot u')/c^2)
u_perp = u'_perp/(gamma_v(1+(v dot u')/c^2))

If your "theory" doesn't have contingent math and falsifiability, it is crap at face value. What testable predictions does it make vs. empirical observations?

http://relativity.livingreviews.org/...1-4/index.html
http://arXiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0311039
http://www.physics.adelaide.edu.au/~...periments.html
Experimental constraints on General Relativity

http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/ptti/ptti2002/paper20.pdf
Nature 425 374 (2003)
http://www.eftaylor.com/pub/projecta.pdf
http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjjacob/Lecture16.pdf
http://relativity.livingreviews.org/...3-1/index.html
Relativity in the GPS system


----------------
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm
Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2006   #4 (permalink)
arkain101's Avatar
Creating


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Complete Unified Theory Model Developed.

Theoretical Model Preview and Summery
I should stress that it is of yet a theory model. The model is a complete concept. The actual theory of this model is a process that is in developement. It is my intentions of this post to recieve input and insight from anyone that is able to do so.
This is not one of those "I have the ultimate theory posts". It is a discussion on the model I am soon to present.

I can lay out a short preview of the model to get things warmed up.

Unified Model:

In this model it is a somewhat simple concept to describe space-time.

There is a proposed two realms.
These two realms function to support one another and allow one another to operate.

These are:
-Space-time
-nospace-time

These are equal and opposite composistions.

This is the use of space-time in the current description and explanation. Here where we have time, motion, change, distance (space) that works in a relative way, described in relativity.

The nospace-time is the equal and opposite realm to the space-time realm. This would be where we would desribe light to be.

The principle to describe this relationship of the two realm is;

There is just as vast as an inward direction as there is of the universe which is vast in an outward characteristic.

Simple Overview:

The universe is large (possible infinite) in space. It is an 'outward' realm. All things act in an outward behavior. This is obviously where we get distance, time, size, mass, magnetic field. An outward 3dimensional. Using a logical presumption there is equally and oppositely an inward acting realm. This is the 3 dimensional realm looked at inwards. As to imagine a 3 dimensional axis (lacking the word for this intersection dimension lines) with all the arrows pointing to the center, the intersection point. Just as far as you can go outward in 'size', the model says you can go equally as great inwards.

How this is expressed is through Magnetic and Electric and electro-magnetic. The charge that is of a particle has magnetic and electric attributes. These are outwards in behavior. Which function perpendicular to eachother. (like a perpendicular set of intersecting lines in a 3 dimensional representation.

(The heart of the model theory is in the following)
Light is this perpendicular relationship, Electro-Magnetic 'particle-wave'. The model suggests that in order to join these two otherwise seperate from eachother phenominas (for lack of better description) of Magnetic and Electric. We must equally and oppositely unite them and doing so we cause light/electromagnetic radiation to be proposed as an inward (note: opposite) equal direction of travel.

An analogy to show this is to imagine a balloon full of water. This is our particle (like a quark) made of course energy in an outwards fassion. Now when we squish this balloon it sends the water to an inwards dimension. (note the squaring which takes place as we shrink a sphere) The water goes to a nospace-time realm and will appear in the other balloons around it.

This place of nospace-time is everywhere and anywhere all at the same time because it is everything (inward). electro-magnetic properties go here -inwards dimensionally- described to be this way by the equal and opposite reaction of magnetic and electric properties acting as a single unit.

This is to desribe how light is everywhere and anywhere for any observer at any time. In simple terms, light does not make its wave through space-time, quite the opposite, it exists in inwards dimensional fassion and appears back into space-time from with-in the very atoms themsevels that the light will be acting on. So if you see something or, an atom is affected by EMR, it is the electromagnetic pulse making its transition from the realm of inwards dimension (where everything is one, one place, one time) to the outwards dimension and is doing this by moving outwards inside the atoms which are 'observers' of the source.

An example; If you see a tree, the image of that tree is transfered via through space-time, however the actual energy of that light comes from with-in the atoms in your eyes that detect it. (This brings up a complicated problem and question. If light is not of 3D space-time, then what is this wave through space-time that we call light? It may be the effect reverse 3D acting in this 3D. Not unlike gravity is a proposed effect of mass in space-time that 'curves' its geometry.

Yet being that we percieve to only exist here in the space-time realm we percieve this action of light as the ripple through space-time with a wave-particle duality characteristic, unbound by time.

Simunatiously, it takes two to have one.

Each dimension realm complements eachothers own existence.

note: it is not size differeneces that we look at when comparing space-time to NOspace-time, it is reverse or equal opposite version of what we think of dimension and it just as vast but lacks the distance and capability of time to flow.


A second principle in this theoretical model is;

There can be no single thing in of itself, all events must require a relationship of a minimum between two things.

-Things like force, mass, light, gravity action. Any of these events is of a relationship of a minimum of two actions. Space-time itself requires a relationship to be.-

This is a wide open preview and summery of the theoretical model.

Relatively there is even a relativeness to the version of relativity. The very possible case of two realm equal and opposite to eachother that work as one and show clues of eachother through invisible 'strange or spooky action at a distance' type things.

Last edited by arkain101; 06-10-2006 at 11:42 PM..
Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2006   #5 (permalink)
KickAssClown's Avatar
A Person


Location:
Here and now
 
KickAssClown is a name known to allKickAssClown is a name known to allKickAssClown is a name known to allKickAssClown is a name known to allKickAssClown is a name known to all
Send a message via MSN to KickAssClown Send a message via Yahoo to KickAssClown
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Complete Unified Theory Model Developed.

Well said and described, I have some reservations, however I will voice them at a later point in time.


----------------
There are no truths in science, only the falsifiable hypotheses and explanations of the people who test them.

Hyper Physics
Hyper Math
Wikipedia
Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2006   #6 (permalink)
arkain101's Avatar
Creating


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Complete Unified Theory Model Developed.

Yes I should respond by the full written format version.

But I will also reply as I can.
Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2006   #7 (permalink)
arkain101's Avatar
Creating


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Complete Unified Theory Model Developed.

There is an equation I put together here in this theory. I was wondering if someone could check it. Also, cancle out the t's and whatever else to show the steps of simplification.
(m*a) (V*t)=q (r^4/t^4)

from:

E=q(r^/t^4)

-->

F*D =q(r^/t^4)

-->

(m*a) (v*t)=q (r^4/t^4)

-->

(m*a) (V*t)=q_E + q_B (r^4/t^4)
or?
(m*a) (V*t)=(q_E*q_B) (r^4/t^4)

Last edited by arkain101; 06-11-2006 at 11:24 AM..
Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2006   #8 (permalink)
EWright's Avatar
Understanding


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Complete Unified Theory Model Developed.

I'm trying to figure out why this "Complete" theory keeps getting added too...
Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2006   #9 (permalink)
Roadam's Avatar
Questioning


Location:
Slovenia,Europe
 
Roadam is a jewel in the roughRoadam is a jewel in the roughRoadam is a jewel in the rough
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Complete Unified Theory Model Developed.

Could someone explain me why these CUTs are and what is the diffrence between your model(KAC) and one presently approved.
Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2006   #10 (permalink)
EWright's Avatar
Understanding


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Complete Unified Theory Model Developed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadam
Could someone explain me why these CUTs are and what is the diffrence between your model(KAC) and one presently approved.
The Complete or "Grand" Unified Theory would allow physicists to undertand fully and completely how the physics of the entire cosmos works. It would merge the physics of General Relativity with that of Quantum Mechanics. Right now the two theorys are not compatible, though each can be used accurately for its specific purpose. So far there is no approved Grand Unified Theory. It would be the most significant scientific accomplishment in all of history... Well, after the "Let the be light" thing from the Original Physicist.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Unified Force Theory Predicts Measured Values of Physics C1ay Science News 36 04-13-2007 01:10 AM
The unified field theory carlitto Physics and Mathematics 14 08-17-2006 05:00 AM
The Gravity Model vs Big Bang Theory W.Davidson Astronomy and Cosmology 43 06-25-2006 10:10 AM
The Unified Theory of Existence Nix Philosophy Forums 25 08-02-2005 06:31 AM
Pheeew...upgrade complete Tormod Announcements 0 06-03-2004 04:10 PM

» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 30.00%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 40.00%
4 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 30.00%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 10
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:02 PM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network