Hi DNal, and welcome to these fora!
interesting post you made, however in my opinion this (and all the work i've skipped through at
http://www.trufax.org where this seems to come from) is hardly a scientiffic article, it just uses many difficoult words...
if i understand this all correctly; this guy made a 3D, real time, image of the magnetic field surrounding his head(the measurements are in the order of pico Gauss; we dont know the uncertainty); and there he noticed that at a certain time (? it is not quite clear to me if the "ER-bridge" was there all the time) there is "... a doughnut crossed by a sausage... ".
This is all completely fine by me. our body certainly produces a small magnetic field; and more or less symmetric shapes like 'doughnuts' and 'sausages' seem completely predictable.
Hoewever here goes something completely wrong with the arguments. This guy has seen to much star-trek and thinks that as soon as he sees something like this:
http://www.astrosociety.org/educatio...ages/hole1.gif he thinks ha has discoverd a Einstein Rosen bridge (more comonly known as wormhole). The point is here that what a ER bridge is about the geometry of space time. So we can e.g. picture us selves confined to a circle (simplified form of the 'doughnut' (or torus)....). While confined to the circle, we can only travel from 2 opposite points, by walking along the circle. an ER bridge would now imply that -all of a sudden- there also is a direct way between 2 opposite points. although what is described in this article looks like this effect, it has nothing to do with it, because the toroidal magnetic field is
NOT confined to a toroidal space time. (at least not at this small scale). It is just a Doughnut shaped field; just as a doughnut is doughnut shaped. (a flaw in your doughnut machine, giving the structure described, also is not an ER bridge...).
simply said, the author shows a complete misconception of the concetps of General relativity (of which an ER bridge is part)...
Bo