This is a cute analogy of the well-known interpretation of field theory.
It should be however said that it shouldn't be taken too literally, it doesn't make too much sense to distinguish between the photon "going the roses" when the distances betwen them is small compared with the wavelength. As usual, quantum descriptions can't be so blithely translated into classical intuitive notions. The interactions between photon and atoms are usually soft (when they aren't, it's a scattering event and that's a different kettle of fish) and all the absorbtions and re-emissions are only "kinda meta-happening", it's a semi-classical description of something that isn't classical at all.
If the lense can focus most of the light according to wave optics, then the potons aren't really quite getting absorbed and re-emitted by single atoms.
----------------
Inutil insegnà al mus, si piart timp, in plui si infastidìs la bestie.
Hypography Forum PITA...... er, Administrator.
