Go Back   Science Forums > General Science Forums > Political sciences
Reply
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools
Old 10-09-2007   #141 (permalink)
freeztar's Avatar
M.C. Grillmeister

Moderator
Editor
Basic Subscription
Sponsor

Location:
ATL, GA, USA
Latest blog entry:
 
freeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Australia

Well I'm not an Ozzie, but this seemed an appropriate place to put this:
Study: Biting spread devil tumors - CNN.com


----------------
Hypography Science Forums Moderator
---
"There are no passengers on Spaceship Earth. We are all crew." - Marshall McLuhan

"We must not forget that when radium was discovered no one knew that it would prove useful in hospitals. The work was one of pure science. And this is a proof that scientific work must not be considered from the point of view of the direct usefulness of it." - Marie Curie
Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2007   #142 (permalink)
Michaelangelica's Avatar
Creating

Editor
Basic Subscription
Sponsor

Location:
North of Sydney Australia
 
Michaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Smile Re: Australia

Quote:
Originally Posted by freeztar View Post
Well I'm not an Ozzie, but this seemed an appropriate place to put this:
Study: Biting spread devil tumors - CNN.com

Thanks for bringing this up. The poor old Tassie Devil does need some help.

Very interesting study this
It has been known in Oz for some few years; now getting a run in OS press. My daughter used to work at Utas where a lot of the research is being done.
It is interesting because it shows Cancer can be caught and passed on like any infection.
All the cancers on the devils are genetically the same.
DPIW - Tasmanian Devil Facial Tumour Disease

They are trying to keep some devils in quarantine but the disease is progressing rapidly.

I am not overly fond of Tasmanian Devils but I know Yanks are, due to Warner Bros. cartoons. (Then, one of the main reasons I went to the States was to see "Chip & Dale" chipmunks!)
Quote:
As at July 2007, the Tasmanian devil disease had spread to 60 separate sites covering 59% of the State.

Across Tasmania, there has been a 53% decline in average sightings in the last decade. In the north-east region, where signs of the Tasmanian devil disease were first reported, there has been a 90 per cent decline of average spotlighting sightings from 1992-95 to 2002-05.
If you would like to help
SEE : (You would think Warner Bros could chip in a few $?)
Quote:
Contribute to the Tasmanian Devil Appeal
The Tasmanian Devil Appeal, launched in late 2003, assists with vital research into the Tasmanian devil facial tumour disease.


You can:

* donate online at www.utas.edu.au/devilappealYou are now leaving our site. DPIWE is not responsible for the content of the web site to which you are going. The link does not constitute any form of endorsement
* return a free donation envelope, available from Service Tasmania centresYou are now leaving our site. DPIWE is not responsible for the content of the web site to which you are going. The link does not constitute any form of endorsement, Parks and WildlifeYou are now leaving our site. DPIWE is not responsible for the content of the web site to which you are going. The link does not constitute any form of endorsement Visitor Centres etc.
* donate at any QantasYou are now leaving our site. DPIWE is not responsible for the content of the web site to which you are going. The link does not constitute any form of endorsement collection sculptures located at: domestic airport terminals at Hobart, Launceston, Sydney and Melbourne; the Tasmanian Museum and Art GalleryYou are now leaving our site. DPIWE is not responsible for the content of the web site to which you are going. The link does not constitute any form of endorsement; Tasmanian Parks and Wildlife Visitor centres at Freycinet, Mt Field, Cradle Mountain and Lake St Clair.

The Tasmanian Devil appeal is administered under the auspices of the University of Tasmania FoundationYou are now leaving our site. DPIWE is not responsible for the content of the web site to which you are going. The link does not constitute any form of endorsement, which nominates and allocates a number of scholarships and grants biannually through the Tasmanian Wildlife Research Advisory Committee (TWRAC).

All appeal funds raised support key research areas approved by the Devil Facial Tumour Disease Steering Committee, which was formed after the October 2005 workshop of scientists and animal health experts from institutions and organisations throughout Australia. Donations to the Tasmanian Devil Appeal over $2 dollars are tax deductible in Australia.

Visit www.tassiedevil.com.auYou are now leaving our site. DPIWE is not responsible for the content of the web site to which you are going. The link does not constitute any form of endorsement or phone the University of Tasmania Foundation on 03 6226 2053 to find out more about the Tasmanian Devil Appeal and other ways you can donate to help save the Tasmanian Devil.
DPIW - Tasmanian Devil Facial Tumour Disease


----------------
"Unemployment is capitalism's way of getting you to plant a garden."
~Orson Scott Card
Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2007   #143 (permalink)
orbsycli's Avatar
specter


Location:
flapjak sizzle
Latest blog entry:
 
orbsycli has much to be proud oforbsycli has much to be proud oforbsycli has much to be proud oforbsycli has much to be proud oforbsycli has much to be proud oforbsycli has much to be proud oforbsycli has much to be proud of
Send a message via AIM to orbsycli
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Australia

why are your wines so good?

there's a distinct difference between yours and ours (cali coast)


----------------
"Rome falls nine times an hour"
Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2007   #144 (permalink)
Michaelangelica's Avatar
Creating

Editor
Basic Subscription
Sponsor

Location:
North of Sydney Australia
 
Michaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Smile Re: Australia

Quote:
Originally Posted by orbsycli View Post
why are your wines so good?

there's a distinct difference between yours and ours (cali coast)
Good question, though I have not tried Californian wines
Partly is is a matter of immigration & multiculturalism.

The Barossa Valley (SA)was settled by Germans and their Rieslings and even reds are suburb. I have never had a bad wine from there. In fact I learnt to drink there as a student in the 60s. I have had 20 year old Rieslings from there were were the nectar of the Gods ( no corks, screw top)

Areas around Rutherglen (Vic/NSW) 100 -150 years ago mainly did Port and Sherry for the British market. Phyloxera and changing tastes killed the market until the sixties. If you want a REALLY FULL BODIED red this is the place to go. It may take a bit of getting used to as their reds are unique hearty and very full bodied. Their Merlo and Blue Imperial are outstanding and can be cellared for eons. So too the stickies and Muscats and Ports. The Muscats are a well kept secret. A good bottle of Rosewood Muscat will set you back $AUD65.00. It is worth every penny.But you can still pick up lovely stuff for $10-20. When I first started my cellar from Rutherglen wine was 75c a bottle sigh. . .

A lot of "Sea Change" doctors and Stockbrokers and other wealthy folk have also yearned to have their own little vineyard in the country. So there are hundreds of small vineyards. We seem to be blessed with a number of good "noses" or blenders. One famous one was a doctor Len Evans. If you can pick up a second-hand copy of his book on smell grab it.

Contrary to what most people think Australia has a huge range of Climates and soils which give a multitude of tastes. From Mediterranean (Tasmania and SA) to the semi-tropical, coastal Cassigrain at Port Macquarie ( a French family). Western Australia too is Mediterranean but has quite a different flavour /feeling to the wines. I love WA whites.

Victoria has a heap of climates and the Yarra valley is carving out a niche for itself. I love its Pino Noirs. Fantastic chilled on a hot summers day with basil and ripe tomatoes (i'm hungry)

The closest wine-making area to me is the Hunter Valley. I have not explored this area as much as i should I drink a lot less wine these days , but i find their reds very dry and 'flinty' probably a bit like some French wines. However there are many new wineries especially in the upper hunter experimenting with some nice drops.
Also Australian wine-makers have not been slow to experiment and take chances. The education of vintners is also world class. Many young Oz wine-makers are working in France and many French companies are buying up wineries here.
Australians are not hidebound to tradition so can try new methods and techniques.
Too we have never suffered from prohibition as the USA has.
Australians drink a lot of wine and beer. I think Americans tend to drink more spirits. It s unlikely that you would ever be offered a "martini" here.

I doubt if you see the best wines O/S as most is produced (80%) by one company. Most of the small wineries sell a lot of their stock at the cellar door or by subscription.

I was appalled by cheap wine in France. Here you can buy something drinkable from $AUD3.00 up with good stuff around $15-20+. Italian cheap wine was a lot better than French cheap wine.

The drought will mean that the $3 bottle will probably not be here next year.
Griffith is a big Italian grape growing area and they have NO water.

I am told the quality and intensity of flavour of what remains is great.

We just hope it rains enough to keep 100 year old vines alive.
It is not as if we can move them to the tropics.


----------------
"Unemployment is capitalism's way of getting you to plant a garden."
~Orson Scott Card
Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2007   #145 (permalink)
Buffy's Avatar
Resident Slayer

Administrator

Location:
Sunnydale, CA
 
Buffy has a reputation beyond reputeBuffy has a reputation beyond reputeBuffy has a reputation beyond reputeBuffy has a reputation beyond reputeBuffy has a reputation beyond reputeBuffy has a reputation beyond reputeBuffy has a reputation beyond reputeBuffy has a reputation beyond reputeBuffy has a reputation beyond reputeBuffy has a reputation beyond reputeBuffy has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Australia

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michaelangelica View Post
I was appalled by cheap wine in France. Here you can buy something drinkable from .00 up with good stuff around $15-20+. Italian cheap wine was a lot better than French cheap wine.
And I think that's data to explain the "effect" you perceive Orb: The snob appeal that puts a premium on the French and California wines actually gives Australian (and Italian!) wines an edge:

I've had a lot of expensive wine from around the world, and I can pick out favorites from each region, but because of that price premium because its French or Californian, if you take a $10 or $30 or $50 wines from each region, you'll find that the same-priced Austrialian bottles taste better than the equivalent California wine, but that there are just as many--in fact possibly many many more--superior *tasting* California wines, you just have to go up to the next price bracket. And even then, there'll be an Aussie bottle that's just as good as the best California bottle.

Statistical economic analysis is boring and opaque: I'd rather have a good Chardonnay,
Buffy


----------------
"If you do not agree with anything I say, I'll not only retract it, but deny under oath that I ever said it!"
__________________________________________________ ______________-- Tom Lehrer

"No Robbie, not Europe!"


Forum Administrator
Hypography Science Forums - Science for Boys and Girls! Its not for nothing that we hang out here.
Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2007   #146 (permalink)
orbsycli's Avatar
specter


Location:
flapjak sizzle
Latest blog entry:
 
orbsycli has much to be proud oforbsycli has much to be proud oforbsycli has much to be proud oforbsycli has much to be proud oforbsycli has much to be proud oforbsycli has much to be proud oforbsycli has much to be proud of
Send a message via AIM to orbsycli
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Australia

austrailian shiraz is quite heavenly


----------------
"Rome falls nine times an hour"
Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2007   #147 (permalink)
LaurieAG's Avatar
Explaining


Location:
South East Queensland, Australia
 
LaurieAG is a splendid one to beholdLaurieAG is a splendid one to beholdLaurieAG is a splendid one to beholdLaurieAG is a splendid one to beholdLaurieAG is a splendid one to beholdLaurieAG is a splendid one to behold
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Australia

Now that John Howard and Kevin Rudd both aspire to a referendum on changing our Constitutional preamble within the next 18 months, will they now reveal what their latest 'advice' on the legality of preambles is?

If, as publically stated by John Howard that preambles are not legally binding, the entire gesture is pointless. On the other hand, if preambles are legally binding, would this proposed Constitutional preamble change serve to rattify the (as yet unrattified) change of status to Australia's national sovereignty contained in the Australia Act 1986 and the bipartisan sale of the majority of our public assets since?

Surely the people of Australia deserve better than this.
Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2007   #148 (permalink)
Michaelangelica's Avatar
Creating

Editor
Basic Subscription
Sponsor

Location:
North of Sydney Australia
 
Michaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Smile Re: Australia

Quote:
Originally Posted by LaurieAG View Post
Now that John Howard and Kevin Rudd both aspire to a referendum on changing our Constitutional preamble within the next 18 months, will they now reveal what their latest 'advice' on the legality of preambles is?
I would guess it is pure BS
The libs/nats are opportunists and have never been constrained by democratic tradition & precedent. A preamble is a joke. We need democratic principles set in concrete not wordy preambles.
Look to Whitlam's dismissal.

Now with the election being called that is no longer relevant; as they can't introduce new legislation

Who do you think will win?
What role will Hillsong and the Exclusive Brethren take?


----------------
"Unemployment is capitalism's way of getting you to plant a garden."
~Orson Scott Card
Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2007   #149 (permalink)
LaurieAG's Avatar
Explaining


Location:
South East Queensland, Australia
 
LaurieAG is a splendid one to beholdLaurieAG is a splendid one to beholdLaurieAG is a splendid one to beholdLaurieAG is a splendid one to beholdLaurieAG is a splendid one to beholdLaurieAG is a splendid one to behold
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Australia

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michaelangelica View Post
I would guess it is pure BS
The libs/nats are opportunists and have never been constrained by democratic tradition & precedent. A preamble is a joke. We need democratic principles set in concrete not wordy preambles.
Look to Whitlam's dismissal.
Hi Michaelangelica,

Yes, the commentators have already mentioned that of the 2 referenda (for the mindless pedants) in 1999, one was also a preamble change.

So, Aboriginal reconciliation via a preamble referendum must be a non core promise if JH still believes that preambles are non legally binding.

If he really does believe that preambles are not legally binding he wouldn't have changed the preamble he commissioned from the poet in 1999, to specifically reference the federal nature of our nation.

But if preambles are legally binding, especially constitutional ones, then a Yes vote in a majority of the states would rattify the change to the status of Australias national sovereignty, under the new command structure contained in the Australia Act 1986.

I've always had an uneasy feeling that our monarch and our politicians cut a deal that Australians would pay for the monarchs historic obligations to Australian Aboriginals (monarchs posessions from 1770-1967), and as their part of this underhand deal, Australian politicians were to secure a republic or equivalent ASAP (or at least before they sold off all of the public assets).

Remember Michaelangelica, in 1986 when the Australia act was passed the federal government was Labor, Bob Hawke was PM and Paul Keating was Treasurer!

Last edited by LaurieAG; 10-16-2007 at 08:53 PM..
Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2007   #150 (permalink)
LaurieAG's Avatar
Explaining


Location:
South East Queensland, Australia
 
LaurieAG is a splendid one to beholdLaurieAG is a splendid one to beholdLaurieAG is a splendid one to beholdLaurieAG is a splendid one to beholdLaurieAG is a splendid one to beholdLaurieAG is a splendid one to behold
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Australia

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michaelangelica View Post
Who do you think will win?
Labor will most probably win, but it will be a fair bit closer than what the polls are saying and, with any luck, the senate will be dominated by the Greens/Democrats instead of a religious party. (I wrote the following over 10 years ago)

'The Green Knights Claim'

Noble sirs, exercise thy renowned might,
honour thine agreement with the Green knight,
tis his by right.

Do not be unnerved, justice shall be served,
while accolades are undeserved
and truthful valour is reserved.

Qualms about the justice of fate,
carry no weight on this judgement date,
pious fervour too late.

Come now and cement the agreed pact,
that ye have enacted through use of his multi-faceted axe.

Once ye have availed of its plentiful resource,
there is nay recourse, ye have chosen thine course.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
australia, oz


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://hypography.com/forums/political-sciences/11764-australia.html
Posted By For Type Date
The Sydney Morning Herald Blogs: Stay in Touch This thread Refback 06-03-2007 04:08 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ID ruled a religious faith in Australia C1ay Science News Elsewhere 3 07-23-2009 04:23 AM
New Member from Australia TonyH Introductions 7 11-17-2008 07:29 AM
Improving the Plight of Caged Animals Humans in Zoo Cage in Australia Michaelangelica Websites 2 06-16-2007 09:44 PM
Update: Australia…List of Ronald Pegg's Discoveries - plus Current Investigation Eddy_P Theology forum 0 02-05-2006 11:26 PM

» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 27.27%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 45.45%
5 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 27.27%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:16 PM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network