Science Forums
Advanced search
User Name
Password

Science Social Network
home    members    help/rules    who is online    contact   

Go Back   Science Forums > Social Sciences Forums > Political sciences
Become a science forums sponsor today
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-25-2008   #11 (permalink)
Moontanman's Avatar
Astounding Vision


 



Re: Depleted Uranium as a nuclear fuel component

Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigD View Post
Moontanman, do you have any support for this claim?

The only nuclear fuel of which I’m aware that uses depleted uranium is MOX. This fuel requires weapon-grade plutonium, however – without the plutonium, the spent uranium is valueless.

Adding depleted uranium to Thorium FBR fuel has been proposed as a way to “spoil” the spent fuel for weapon use (see Fast breeder reactor - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia). The depleted uranium in this application is simply an additive, not a fuel.

In neither case is depleted uranium alone worth very much. Since it’s an inexpensive waste product of conventional fission power plants, I doubt you (or an enemy) could profit much by gathering depleted uranium projectiles.
http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/thyd/ne1.../project5.html


----------------
Michael
Life is the poetry of the universe.
Love is the poetry of life.

Nuclear is the only real option!
http://www.nuclearspace.com/Liberty_ship_menupg.aspx

Check this out
http://www.conservationfisheries.org...ream_lines.htm

Over heard from a three year old, "Daddy why do my toes get sticky when I eat strawberry jam?"

Never wrestle a troll. You both get dirty and the troll likes it

Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008   #12 (permalink)
freeztar's Avatar
Married man

Hypography Staff Member
Moderator
Editor
Silver Subscription
Sponsor

Latest blog entry:
Pics
 
freeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond repute
 



Re: Depleted Uranium as a nuclear fuel component

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moontanman View Post
That article states:

Quote:
In conclusion, since Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactor use U(238)
As MB mentioned above, there is some fissile U-235 remaining, but it was implied that no U-238 remained.


----------------
Hypography Science Forums Moderator
---
"There are no passengers on Spaceship Earth. We are all crew." - Marshall McLuhan

"We must not forget that when radium was discovered no one knew that it would prove useful in hospitals. The work was one of pure science. And this is a proof that scientific work must not be considered from the point of view of the direct usefulness of it." - Marie Curie
Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008   #13 (permalink)
Moontanman's Avatar
Astounding Vision


 



Re: Depleted Uranium as a nuclear fuel component

Quote:
Originally Posted by freeztar View Post
That article states:



As MB mentioned above, there is some fissile U-235 remaining, but it was implied that no U-238 remained.
did you bother to actually read trhe artical? Here is the introduction.

Introduction
Nuclear energy, though presently being debated and publicly discussed, contributes significantly to the electricity production in industrialized countries, often to more than 30%. Because the world's reserves of U(235) are not adequate to support indefinitely the needs of a growing nuclear power industry based only on burner or converter reactors, the breeder reactors become more and more popular today. With the introduction of breeder reactors, the fuel base switches from U(235) to U(238) or thorium, both of which are considerably more plentiful than U(235). Furthermore, all of the depleted uranium--that is, the residual uranium, mostly U(238), remaining after the isotope enrichment process--can be utilized as breeder fuel. Breeder Reactors are capable of satisfying the electrical energy needs of the world for thousands of years.

Background


----------------
Michael
Life is the poetry of the universe.
Love is the poetry of life.

Nuclear is the only real option!
http://www.nuclearspace.com/Liberty_ship_menupg.aspx

Check this out
http://www.conservationfisheries.org...ream_lines.htm

Over heard from a three year old, "Daddy why do my toes get sticky when I eat strawberry jam?"

Never wrestle a troll. You both get dirty and the troll likes it

Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008   #14 (permalink)
Mercedes Benzene's Avatar
Student

Hypography Staff Member
Moderator
Editor

 



Re: Depleted Uranium Munitions

Can a breeder reactor function on U-238 alone?
It seems like you would need a whole lot of it for that to be possible. I will admit I don't know much about breeder reactors.


----------------
Moderator -- Chemistry, Biology, Watercooler, Competitions, Architecture.

Join our Facebook group
Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008   #15 (permalink)
CraigD's Avatar
Creating

Hypography Staff Member
Administrator
Editor

 



Post You can't run an FBR on U-238 alone

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moontanman View Post
From the linked-to article:
Quote:
The LMFBR operates on the uranium-plutonium fuel cycle or thorium-U(233) fuel cycle. The reactor is fueled with bred isotopes of plutonium in the core, and the blanket is natural or depleted uranium.
and 2 paragraphs earlier
Quote:
Furthermore, all of the depleted uranium--that is, the residual uranium, mostly U(238), remaining after the isotope enrichment process--can be utilized as breeder fuel
Fast breeder reactors can use the depleted uranium (U-238) produced as a by-product of producing enriched uranium (U-235), but their primary energy source is PU-238, which is produced in U-235 reactors, taken from dismantled nuclear bombs, or from U-238 that has been transformed (“bred”) by the FBR.

U-238 in a FBR isn’t fuel, in the usual sense, but is transformed into fuel by its plutonium core, making a system of FBRs and reprocessing plants very efficient.

A FBR won’t work (nor will any reactor) if fueled by depleted uranium alone – it must have enriched plutonium. Depleted uranium is cheap and plentiful, while enriched plutonium is rare, expensive, and available only to a few nations. So I just can’t see how the original claim
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moontanman View Post
Depleted urnium is the fuel of teh future. It wil be in demand for fast breeder reactors and other moder n reactors. Shooting it an enemy is like shooting oil at them.
can be true. Anybody with the plutonium they need to fuel a FBR will already have more depleted uranium than they need, and won’t be interested in buying it from people who have had their fields littered with it by a passing military, unless through some coincidence of lack of foresight and shooting a lot of depleted uranium projectiles, a nuclear state uses up all its depleted uranium making projectiles. Even if this were to happen, it could make more by enriching uranium for a conventional fission reactor, which it has constant need to do to supply its conventional fission (U-235) reactors.


----------------
Moderator: Computers and Technology; Medical Science; Science Projects and Homework; Philosophy of Science; Physics and Mathematics; Environmental Studies
Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008   #16 (permalink)
freeztar's Avatar
Married man

Hypography Staff Member
Moderator
Editor
Silver Subscription
Sponsor

Latest blog entry:
Pics
 
freeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond repute
 



Re: Depleted Uranium Munitions

No, I didn't, just skimmed it.
I also had it backwards as U-238 is depleted uranium.

The wiki article on breeder reactors does indeed mention using U-238:

Quote:
Production of fissile material in a reactor occurs by neutron irradiation of fertile material, particularly Uranium-238 and Thorium-232.
So the U-238 is processed and turned into P-239 (?) from the neutrons streaming out, presumably from the plutonium.

Quote:
In many FBR designs, the reactor core is surrounded in a blanket of tubes containing non-fissile uranium-238 which, by capturing fast neutrons from the reaction in the core, is partially converted to fissile plutonium 239 (as is some of the uranium in the core), which can then be reprocessed for use as nuclear fuel. Other FBR designs rely on the geometry of the fuel itself (which also contains uranium-238) to attain sufficient fast neutron capture.
Fast breeder reactor - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

So it appears that without enriched plutonium, you can't do anything with the depleted U in FBR technology. But the last sentence in the quote above does not make that clear.


----------------
Hypography Science Forums Moderator
---
"There are no passengers on Spaceship Earth. We are all crew." - Marshall McLuhan

"We must not forget that when radium was discovered no one knew that it would prove useful in hospitals. The work was one of pure science. And this is a proof that scientific work must not be considered from the point of view of the direct usefulness of it." - Marie Curie

Last edited by freeztar; 01-25-2008 at 03:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008   #17 (permalink)
freeztar's Avatar
Married man

Hypography Staff Member
Moderator
Editor
Silver Subscription
Sponsor

Latest blog entry:
Pics
 
freeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond repute
 



Re: You can't run an FBR on U-238 alone

You beat me to it Craig.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigD View Post
From the linked-to article:and 2 paragraphs earlierFast breeder reactors can use the depleted uranium (U-238) produced as a by-product of producing enriched uranium (U-235), but their primary energy source is PU-238, which is produced in U-235 reactors, taken from dismantled nuclear bombs, or from U-238 that has been transformed (“bred”) by the FBR.
In the wiki article I linked to in my last post, it says that the U-238 is converted into Plutonium-239. Is that a typo?


----------------
Hypography Science Forums Moderator
---
"There are no passengers on Spaceship Earth. We are all crew." - Marshall McLuhan

"We must not forget that when radium was discovered no one knew that it would prove useful in hospitals. The work was one of pure science. And this is a proof that scientific work must not be considered from the point of view of the direct usefulness of it." - Marie Curie
Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008   #18 (permalink)
Mercedes Benzene's Avatar
Student

Hypography Staff Member
Moderator
Editor

 



Re: You can't run an FBR on U-238 alone

Quote:
Originally Posted by freeztar View Post
You beat me to it Craig.



In the wiki article I linked to in my last post, it says that the U-238 is converted into Plutonium-239. Is that a typo?
I don't think that's a typo. It's very possible to transmute U-238 to Pu-239, and reading up on breeder reactors, it seems that is exactly what happens.


----------------
Moderator -- Chemistry, Biology, Watercooler, Competitions, Architecture.

Join our Facebook group
Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008   #19 (permalink)
freeztar's Avatar
Married man

Hypography Staff Member
Moderator
Editor
Silver Subscription
Sponsor

Latest blog entry:
Pics
 
freeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond repute
 



Re: Depleted Uranium Munitions

So what about the U-235 Craig brought up?
Perhaps it's in one of the links, but to be honest I did not read them all, just skimmed. I'm trying to get as much Hypo time in as possible before the fiancee shows up and demands all my attention, so I've been comparably light on the reading/researching tonight.


----------------
Hypography Science Forums Moderator
---
"There are no passengers on Spaceship Earth. We are all crew." - Marshall McLuhan

"We must not forget that when radium was discovered no one knew that it would prove useful in hospitals. The work was one of pure science. And this is a proof that scientific work must not be considered from the point of view of the direct usefulness of it." - Marie Curie
Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008   #20 (permalink)
Moontanman's Avatar
Astounding Vision


 



Re: You can't run an FBR on U-238 alone

Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigD View Post
From the linked-to article:and 2 paragraphs earlierFast breeder reactors can use the depleted uranium (U-238) produced as a by-product of producing enriched uranium (U-235), but their primary energy source is PU-238, which is produced in U-235 reactors, taken from dismantled nuclear bombs, or from U-238 that has been transformed (“bred”) by the FBR.

U-238 in a FBR isn’t fuel, in the usual sense, but is transformed into fuel by its plutonium core, making a system of FBRs and reprocessing plants very efficient.

A FBR won’t work (nor will any reactor) if fueled by depleted uranium alone – it must have enriched plutonium. Depleted uranium is cheap and plentiful, while enriched plutonium is rare, expensive, and available only to a few nations. So I just can’t see how the original claimcan be true. Anybody with the plutonium they need to fuel a FBR will already have more depleted uranium than they need, and won’t be interested in buying it from people who have had their fields littered with it by a passing military, unless through some coincidence of lack of foresight and shooting a lot of depleted uranium projectiles, a nuclear state uses up all its depleted uranium making projectiles. Even if this were to happen, it could make more by enriching uranium for a conventional fission reactor, which it has constant need to do to supply its conventional fission (U-235) reactors.

the reaction can also be started by thorium isotopes but the main this that once you get the reation started it breeds more and more plutonium to star more reactions. Using like that the supply of plutonium, which by the way when the thorium cycle is it cannot be used for nuclear bombs. Some people think that thorium is the way to go and avoid the whole uranium scare thing. the only reson we now uranium is that this 1950's tecnology and change come slowly to some tecnologies.


----------------
Michael
Life is the poetry of the universe.
Love is the poetry of life.

Nuclear is the only real option!
http://www.nuclearspace.com/Liberty_ship_menupg.aspx

Check this out
http://www.conservationfisheries.org...ream_lines.htm

Over heard from a three year old, "Daddy why do my toes get sticky when I eat strawberry jam?"

Never wrestle a troll. You both get dirty and the troll likes it

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How much energy does Thorium contain in relation to Uranium? gribbon Physics and Mathematics 5 04-24-2007 06:28 AM
Hezbollah,Iran,uranium. Edella Political sciences 20 09-10-2006 06:52 AM
Uranium and Supply Racoon Chemistry 7 07-19-2006 03:28 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:01 PM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc. Copyright © 2000-2008 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network