| | #61 (permalink) | ||
| Understanding | Re: Is the United States ready for a President who speaks to the populace like adults Quote:
Section 8: The Powers of Congress Clause 4: To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization Clearly the naturalization laws of 1790, 1795, 1798, and 1802 were allowed by the above power given to Congress by the Constitution. ---------------- "Those who forget to remember the past are condemned to repeat it", George Santayana | ||
| |||
| | #62 (permalink) | |
| ¿42? | Re: Is the United States ready for a President who speaks to the populace like adults I'm not saying people couldn't become citizens, I'm saying the Constitution gave them no rights. All of the people's rights were in the hands of the state governments until the Bill Of Rights was added. The lack of a bill of rights was one of the key reasons that several delegates refused to sign the Constitution at the Constitutional Convention. ---------------- Clay Editor and Forum Administrator stego anyone? Add yourself to Hypography's Frappr. "There are only 10 kinds of people in the world -- .....Those who understand binary, and those who don't." "Draw no conclusions before their time." | |
| ||
| | #63 (permalink) | |
| Creating | As Reason notes in post #40 the apportionment of US electors is closer to the based-on-population apportionment of members of Congress’s House of Representatives than the 2-per-state of its Senate. It’s actually based on the sum of each state’s Senators and Representatives, except that DC, which has no senators and one non-voting representative, nonetheless gets 3 electors. The individual state legislatures, and, for DC, Congress, determines how the slate of electors are chosen. In all but Maine (4 electors) and Nebraska (5), have some form of “winner-takes-all”, where the candidate who wins the popular vote, or the greatest number of nearly equal-population districts, wins all the electors. The history, purpose, strengths, weaknesses, and fairness of this scheme is a complicated, lengthy and controversial subject. However, with a few simplifying assumptions, one can pretty easily make a non-trivial game of it, like this:
Code: State Abbrs: AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DC DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY # of Reps: 7 1 8 4 53 7 5 1 1 25 13 2 2 19 9 5 4 6 7 2* 8 10 15 8 4 9 1 3* 3 2 13 3 29 13 1 18 5 5 19 2 6 1 9 32 3 1 11 9 3 8 1 Cand 1 : 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Cand 2 : 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 wins: 2 1* 4* 2* 15 2 3* 1* 1* 16*4 2* 1* 13*5* 3* 2* 2 2 1* 5* 8* 5 2 1 4 0 3* 3* 1* 6 1 15*4 0 6 4* 1 13*2* 4* 0 7* 13 1 1* 5 6* 1 2 1* 2 wins: 5* 0 4 2 38*5* 2 0 0 9 9* 0 1 6 4 2 2 4* 5* 1 3 2 10*6* 3* 5* 1* 0 0 1 7* 2* 14 9* 1* 12*1 4* 6 0 2 1* 2 19*2* 0 6* 3 2* 6* 0 Wins: 207 229* States: 28 23 Electors: 250 288* 1 wins: 4* 1* 2 2 28*2 4* 1* 1* 18*5 2* 1 13*5* 3* 3* 3* 3 0 4* 6* 4 3 1 3 1* 1 1 1 4 3* 12 8* 0 10*3* 2 13*1 3* 0 2 20*1 1* 4 6* 1 4 1* 2 wins: 3 0 6* 2* 25 5* 1 0 0 7 8* 0 1* 6 4 2 1 3 4* 2* 4 4 11*5* 3* 6* 0 2* 2* 1* 9* 0 17*5 1* 8 2 3* 6 1* 3 1* 7* 12 2* 0 7* 3 2* 4* 0 Wins: 225* 211 States: 26 25 Electors: 317* 221 1 wins: 2 1* 3 2* 33*2 4* 1* 1* 11 3 0 0 10*7* 3* 2* 1 4* 2* 2 5* 6 5* 3* 4 1* 2* 2* 0 8* 2* 15*7* 1* 10*4* 2 9 2* 3 1* 4 17*2* 1* 4 6* 1 4* 1* 2 wins: 5* 0 5* 2 20 5* 1 0 0 14*10*2* 2* 9 2 2 2 5* 3 0 6* 5 9* 3 1 5* 0 1 1 2* 5 1 14 6 0 8 1 3* 10*0 3* 0 5* 15 1 0 7* 3 2* 4 0 Wins: 226* 210 States: 33 18 Electors: 344* 194 ... 1 wins: 2 0 3 3* 28*3 1 1* 0 10 8* 2* 2* 11*6* 3* 1 2 1 1* 3 4 8* 4* 1 6* 0 1 3* 1 4 2* 16*5 1* 6 5* 3* 10*1 4* 1* 1 5 1 1* 6* 2 2* 4 1* 2 wins: 5* 1* 5* 1 25 4* 4* 0 1* 15*5 0 0 8 3 2 3* 4* 6* 1 5* 6* 7 4 3* 3 1* 2* 0 1* 9* 1 13 8* 0 12*0 2 9 1* 2 0 8* 27*2* 0 5 7* 1 4* 0 Wins: 200 236* States: 26 25 Electors: 282* 256 Cand 1 : 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Cand 2 : 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 wins: 2 0 5* 2* 21 3 3* 1* 1* 9 5 0 0 4 2 2 2 2 4* 1* 2 3 5 3 1 4 0 0 2* 1* 1 1 13 3 1* 6 2 1 3 0 4* 0 2 10 0 1* 4 1 0 1 1* 2 wins: 5* 1* 3 2 32*4* 2 0 0 16*8* 2* 2* 15*7* 3* 2* 4* 3 1 6* 7* 10*5* 3* 5* 1* 3* 1 1 12*2* 16*10*0 12*3* 4* 16*2* 2 1* 7* 22*3* 0 7* 8* 3* 7* 0 Wins: 145 291* States: 13 38 Electors: 67 471* 1 wins: 1 0 1 1 20 1 0 0 1* 5 2 1 0 5 5* 1 1 3* 1 1 4* 3 6 4 2* 1 0 0 1 1 5 1 9 8* 1* 8 3* 1 3 0 3* 0 0 12 1 0 3 3 1 2 1* 2 wins: 6* 1* 7* 3* 33*6* 5* 1* 0 20*11*1* 2* 14*4 4* 3* 3 6* 1* 4 7* 9* 4* 2 8* 1* 3* 2* 1* 8* 2* 20*5 0 10*2 4* 16*2* 3 1* 9* 20*2* 1* 8* 6* 2* 6* 0 Wins: 137 299* States: 10 41 Electors: 75 463* 1 wins: 4* 0 2 1 17 4* 3* 0 0 5 3 1* 1* 8 1 1 1 2 1 0 4* 1 4 4 1 2 0 1 1 1 5 2* 8 5 1* 5 1 2 3 1* 2 0 3 14 1 0 1 2 2* 2 1* 2 wins: 3 1* 6* 3* 36*3 2 1* 1* 20*10*1 1 11*8* 4* 3* 4* 6* 2* 4 9* 11*4* 3* 7* 1* 2* 2* 1* 8* 1 21*8* 0 13*4* 3* 16*1 4* 1* 6* 18*2* 1* 10*7* 1 6* 0 Wins: 135 301* States: 11 40 Electors: 64 474* 1 wins: 1 0 4 1 15 3 2 0 0 9 3 0 0 7 2 0 0 5* 2 0 3 7* 4 1 3* 3 1* 2* 0 1* 6 2* 13 2 1* 8 2 3* 5 1* 0 0 1 6 1 0 6* 2 1 3 1* 2 wins: 6* 1* 4* 3* 38*4* 3* 1* 1* 16*10*2* 2* 12*7* 5* 4* 1 5* 2* 5* 3 11*7* 1 6* 0 1 3* 1 7* 1 16*11*0 10*3* 2 14*1 6* 1* 8* 26*2* 1* 5 7* 2* 5* 0 Wins: 143 293* States: 12 39 Electors: 72 466* The number of states and elector rules can, of course, be tweaked as desired. For people with a MUMPS interpreter, here’s the code that produces the above (slightly cleaned up) output: Code: f r R q:'(R) s I=((R,";",(R,";")),":") i (I) s @I=R ;XRX: read xecute code
n (XGEC) x XGEC(1),XGEC(3) f x XGEC(4),XGEC(6),XGEC(5) r " Repeat? NO/ ",R,! q:(R,"no","NO")?1(1"",1"N".1"O") ;XGEC: The electoral college game
n (XGEC,SA,SR,AE) r "State Abbrs: ",R,! x XGEC(2) s SA=R r "# of Reps: ",R,! x XGEC(2) s SR=R r "# Senators: ",AE,! ;XGEC(1)
n (XGEC,R) x XGEC(2,1),XGEC(2,2) ;XGEC(2)
s R=(R,":",(R,":")) f q:R'[" " s (R," ",1,2)=(R," ")_" "_(R," ",2) ;XGEC(2,1)
s:(R)=" " (R)="" s:(R,(R))=" " (R,(R))="" ;XGEC(2,2)
n (XGEC,MS) k MS f I=1:1 w "Cand ",I," :",?13 r R,! q:R="" x XGEC(2) s MS(I)=R ;XGEC(3)
n (XGEC,W,WV,WS,SR,AE,MS) x XGEC(4,1),XGEC(4,2) ;XGEC(4): determine winner
n (T,SR,MS) s T="" f J=1:1:(SR," ") f I=1:1:(MS(""),-1) s (T," ",J)=(MS(I)," ",J)+(T," ",J) ;XGEC(4,1): total MS(I)
n (XGEC,W,WV,WS,SR,AE,MS,T) k WV s (W,WV,WS)="" f J=1:1:(SR," ") x XGEC(4,2,1),XGEC(4,2,2) s SRJ=(SR," ",J),(WS," ",IW)=(WS," ",IW)+1 x XGEC(4,3,(SRJ["*":2,1:1)) ;XGEC(4,2)
n (SR,WJ,WV,MS,T,J) s WJ="" f K=1:1:(SR," ",J) s R=((T," ",J)) f I=1:1:(MS(""),-1) s R=R-(MS(I)," ",J) i R<0 s (WJ," ",I)=(WJ," ",I)+1,(WV," ",I)=(WV," ",I)+1,(WV(I)," ",J)=((WV(I))," ",J)+1 q ;XGEC(4,2,1)
n (XGEC,WJ,J,WV,IW) x XGEC(4,2,2,1) s (IW)="",IW=(IW," ",((IW," "))+1),(WV(IW)," ",J)=(WV(IW)," ",J)_"*" ;XGEC(4,2,2): find top I
s (M,IW)="" f I=1:1:(WJ," ") s N=(WJ," ",I) s:N>M IW="",M=N s:M=N IW=IW_" "_I ;XGEC(4,2,2,1)
s (W," ",IW)=(W," ",IW)+SRJ+AE ;XGEC(4,3,1): winner take all allocation method
s (W," ",IW)=(W," ",IW)+AE f I=1:1:(WJ," ") s (W," ",I)=(W," ",I)+(WJ," ",I) ;XGEC(4,3,2): congressional district allocation method
n (XGEC,W,WV,WS) s R=W x XGEC(5,1),XGEC(5,2) s W=R,R=WV x XGEC(5,1),XGEC(5,2) s WV=R w "Wins: ",WV," States: ",WS," Electors: ",W ;XGEC(5): mark winners
s (M,IW)="" f I=1:1:(R," ") s N=(R," ",I) s:N>M M=N,IW="" s:N=M IW=IW_" "_I ;XGEC(5,1)
f J=2:1:(IW) s I=(IW," ",I),(R," ",I)=(R," ",I)_"*" ;XGEC(5,2)
n (SA,MS,WV) f I=1:1:(MS(""),-1) s NN=(WV(I)) w I," wins: ",?13 f J=1:1 s L=((SA," ",J))+1,N=(NN," ",J),(N,"*")=+N w (N_("",L),1,L) i J=(SA," ") w ! q ;XGEC(6): display wins by state
x XGEC
---------------- Moderator: Computers and Technology; Medical Science; Science Projects and Homework; Philosophy of Science; Physics and Mathematics; Environmental Studies ![]() | |
| ||
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| infantile |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Guantanamo Bay: Shame on you, United States | Michaelangelica | Political sciences | 243 | 4 Days Ago 07:44 PM |
| You are called upon by the next President of the United States to head up a.... | damocles | Political sciences | 51 | 07-24-2007 01:07 AM |
| Madam Speaker, The President of the United States | InfiniteNow | Political sciences | 33 | 07-03-2007 09:15 PM |
| Theocratic United States? | TheBigDog | Political sciences | 52 | 11-07-2006 08:37 AM |
| Starting a company in the United States... | matrixscarface | Political sciences | 2 | 03-28-2006 09:03 PM |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:16 PM.
















