| | #51 (permalink) | |
| Understanding | Re: Vice Presidential Debate alexander; Well laid out argument...but a couple points from my perspective.. The VP, serves at the "pleasure of the President" and duties given under the general restrictions authorized by the Constitution. If the President wishes nearly any objective sough by any VP pick can be pursued. I think there are plenty of programs already available for disadvantaged children, which Palin could influence, but her expertise in Energy would be most useful IMO... No President in the past 75-100 years has had total control over the Executive Branch, most basically figureheads for those that actually do the work, negotiation and formation of policy and in accordance to the importance of that work. Thousands of decisions are made daily, by the IRS field workers to Department Heads with in the administration effecting virtually every person in the country, if not world and on a daily basis. Said another way; President's and I believe correctly reflect the personality of the society they represent and at the times elected. Todays America could be found in Obama or Palin, not IMO in either Biden or McCain. Though it appears, Obama followers are in control their are as many in the Palin camp, but she is not running for the number one spot. As for diplomacy; Virtually any agreement made by the President is subject to Congressional approval, certainly anything near a treaty which must be ratified. Obama can say what ever he wants to to get elected, but getting congressional action, even with a Democratic Congress, may not be easy. Frankly my worry is, Congress would control Obama and to a degree never imagined by the founders of this country. One little other thing; The person elected needs the availability of people who can and will serve in his/her administration. Forgetting guilt by association, McCain currently has the respect of most those persons or by comparisons much more qualified than anything Obama could attract. McCain, also is nearing the end of a political career, not likely concerned with the next election, any legacy or promotion of personal agenda's for purpose. Obama is showing all the signs of an eight year term and influencing national policy well beyond that. | |
| | #52 (permalink) | |
| Politically Incorrect | Re: Vice Presidential Debate Heres a SNL spoof of the debate. Tina Fey nails Gov. Palin. Saturday Night Live Television show - Saturday Night Live TV Show - Yahoo! TV | |
| | #53 (permalink) | |||||
| Resident USSRian | Re: Vice Presidential Debate Quote:
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
---------------- And remember that great question that Pierre-Simon Laplace and Sir Isaac Newton, Andrei Markov and David Hilbert, Richard Feynman and Enrico Fermi, Albert Einstein and Edmund Halley did not come to ask throughout all of their dedication and work: "Who the hell is IMing me?" This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License. ![]() | |||||
| | #54 (permalink) | |
| Understanding | Re: Vice Presidential Debate alexander; Of course I haven't sat down and talked with Palin, but reading between the few lines written, I feel she has a realistic view of transforming energy from what is to renewable. Frankly IMO, were 30 years from dependency, free if then and putting off building of new Nuclear Generators, use of coal, even compressed natural gas infrastructure is vital. Obama thinking ten years is not going to happen and any delay in keeping the current structure up to date and modern is self defeating. Our electrical grid system is ready to collapse and building around this system to allow alternatives into the system (opposed to local) make little sense for years to come. On transportation fuel, think Nano Tech will supply some interesting remedies in the future, but NEVER get to even todays cost for crude for econonomical...Oh yes, Geo Thermal is one power source, I never hear much about but getting some very good results in California, Nevada and probably could supply all of Alaska in a few years. Remember I am talking US and world requirement (China/Russia/India/Africa) may be a hundred years from even trying alternatives. Congress does hold the purse strings and can cut anything they want from the budget. If it is Obama and a Democratic Congress, you may not like the compromise I see being used. On short time programs (Executive Orders) or added duties to a department, they are subject to Executive Duties and/or testing in the Supreme Court, IF USED. I could see a State Driven Constitutional Convention being formed on many interest, with in a year to 18 months...if not used. | |
| | #55 (permalink) | ||
| Resident USSRian | Re: Vice Presidential Debate Quote:
Start off the top of your list: China builds most of the solar panels, and with their new outlook on global warming, they are finally moving towards cleaning up the air, taking lessons learned in Beijing, and applying them to other industrial cities. Now, i am not saying that China will move on alternative fuel any time soon, they do have a very extensive fossil fuels infrastructure that may be reluctant to new energy invaders... since i only have time for one more, lets do a coin flip, ah, here we go Russia, with smart european minds, vast expansion area and fossil reserves, they are an interesting mix. They well realize that there is a global greenhouse problem, and that it is caused by the fossil fuels. They have an extensive grid of nuclear power plants, they have one of the largest hydroelectric plants (in the top 5), and they do a lot of research in alternative fuels, and technologies. Energy Ministry report implies that Russia has the resources not just for abundant hydrocarbons, but renewable sources as well. "We have a stock of five times the amount of renewable and alternative energy that we are currently using". They recently talked to Venezuela, to partner up in some researches to come up with solutions for alternative and clean fuels, both production of them, and further research. The report mentions that the use of non-traditional energy sources might reach as much as 30 percent by 2030. "there is an abundance of small businesses that offer, for instance, solar panels that people can buy for their homes. On a small, non-centralized scale, there is some visible effort. The Moscow city government, for instance, is funding an experiment in using solar panels to heat homes. Another experimental project is the "green office," where employers are encouraged to adopt conservation strategies in the workplace. Last year, meanwhile, Mikhail Prokhorov, the chief of the Onexim investment fund, announced plans for the Megion Hydrogen Partnership - an effort to build a car park that would run on hydrogen in the Far East Khanty-Mansiysk town of Megion. " (Moscow News - National - Alternative Fuel: Russia?s (Modest) Strides) citing further down "Earlier this month, for instance, researchers at the Vinogradsky Institute of Microbiology of the Russian Academy of Sciences made a startling discovery: a rare, archeal microorganism that produces hydrogen by breaking down cellulose. The result? The U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute will continue researching the organism." last quote, then i have to go "Yevgeny Korolyev, a researcher at Tekhnogaz GIAP, a company that develops DME (dimethyl ether) as part of the Karpov Institute of Chemistry Research in Moscow, described a problem common for scientists. "The higher the price for oil, the more interest there is in alternative fuel," he told The Moscow News. "The more interest there is, the more chances that our technologies will be applied." The problem is that while there might be great potential demand, the real demand is not dependable. DME, a clean fuel derived by chemical conversion of natural gas or coal, is an isomer of ethanol (meaning it has the same atoms but a different molecular structure), and has the same fuel properties as propane-butane. Its advantages are attracting major energy companies in Europe: it does not emit any sulfur, nor does it generate carbon or any particulate matters. "Gas is the most economic source, but DME can also be derived from oil, coal, and biomass," says Korolyev. " Point is, you can't approach this as a typical American, just because you dont hear about it on CNN, does not mean it does not happen. Watch a real news channel, watch BBC America, at least their world news section is really about news around the world... ---------------- And remember that great question that Pierre-Simon Laplace and Sir Isaac Newton, Andrei Markov and David Hilbert, Richard Feynman and Enrico Fermi, Albert Einstein and Edmund Halley did not come to ask throughout all of their dedication and work: "Who the hell is IMing me?" This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License. ![]() | ||
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| debate, politics |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Presidential Debate: Round 1 | Turtle | Political sciences | 24 | 09-30-2008 12:07 PM |
| Hot Dog Eating Contest or Presidential Debate? | Buffy | Community Polls | 17 | 09-05-2007 08:30 AM |
| Which Presidential hopefuls don't believe in evolution? | Zythryn | Watercooler | 39 | 05-08-2007 03:56 PM |
| Presidential pardons... | Boerseun | Watercooler | 4 | 11-21-2006 03:17 PM |
| Religion and presidential candidates | Mercedes Benzene | Political sciences | 19 | 07-10-2006 11:43 AM |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:32 PM.

















