The morals I specified there do not require this organised religion, just simple logic (and sometimes personal experience) that can be taught in the classroom. If you wish to discuss ths further I agree It should be moved to another threadso this one can stay on the new education topic.
Back to my educational comments, I'd also like to point out
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by questor
i think one of our major problems is in thinking we can GIVE someone an education. all we can do is provide facilities and faculties that allow them to educate themselves.
|
I agree with you, but I will point out that the environment that of the Canadian school systems i have been in was not the greatest. Here I noticed that from grade 4 all that was presented in the class was to relearn everything that we had learned from k-4, until grade 10 when the class was finally permitted to learn new stuff in math class like algebra and trig.
English class was relatively useless (to me) but I was still forced to go. Computer class was 'teaching' basic computer use, when most of the kids in there were trying to learn how to program the macheines, and had learned Basic and HTML programming in middle-school (before the class was discontinued).
All in all the system seemed designed to retard rather than help the sstudent's education, and enforce the 'Simon says' reaction in everybody. Regardless of actual grades, attendance was the main requirement in the school, if you showed up you'd pass, if you didn't you were failed. This is a Major problem in my eyes: if somebody obviously knows everything the class offers, why should they be required to stay there instead of continuing to learn in the next grade or even in another subject? That's why I say that testing is much more important than repetitive work. and will show a student's strong and weak areas much more clearly.
----------------
Sometimes a Hypography Forum Administrator

"With a big enough engine, even a brick will fly." -Law of Aerospace