With poll responses down to 1 in the last 24 hours, I think it’s time to discuss the results of the
”Puzzle survey to confirm a published result”. Per people’s suggestions, the poll remains open, so if you haven’t yet voted, feel free to read it’s
first post and vote your answer.
Here is the puzzle:
Quote:
Each card has a single letter on one side, a single number on the other. (As is normal with cards) you can only see one side of each card. You see these 4 cards:
A F 2 7
You are asked to determine the truth of the statement “every card with a vowel on one side has an even number on the other” by flipping as few cards as possible.
|
As of the time of this post, the answers given by us hypography members are:
Votes % Answer
6 37.50 #1 and #2 and #3 and #4 (A and F and 2 and 7) – all of the cards
4 25.00 #1 and #3 (A and 2)
3 18.75 #1 and #4 (A and 7)
2 12.50 None of the above
1 6.25 #1 and #2 (A and F)
The correct answer is: Flip cards #1 and #4 (A and 7). As described in the literature, less than 20% - 18.75% - of us answered correctly, despite our being, IMO, an unusually logical and precise community of people. The sample size – 15 - is too small to be conclusive, but doesn’t contradict the literature.
To see why, consider if card #1, which shows a vowel, has an odd number on its other side. This would make the statement false. If card #4, which shows an odd number, had a vowel, the statement would be false. Since the statement doesn’t say anything about consonants, we don’t care what’s on card #2, and since it isn’t contradicted by a consonant on a card with an even number, we don’t care about card #3 (In formal terms, (V->E)‘->(‘V->’E)).

So, the 13 people who got the wrong answer, what lead you astray? What insights into our cognitive processes can this provide?
PS: This puzzle, and the observation that fewer than 20% of most populations get it correct on the first try, was described in 1966 by psychologist Peter Wason.
The book in which I encountered it is William Poundstone’s “How Would You Move Mount Fuji?” Despite it’s subtitle, “Microsoft's Cult of the Puzzle - How the World's Smartest Company Selects the Most Creative Thinkers”, this book actually examines the history of intelligence and aptitude testing in general, and is fairly critical of how smart employers actually are to rely on puzzles in screening potential employees.