Quote:
|
Originally Posted by otcartsid
I like Questor's explanation about the benefits of capitalism..."wealth is not a zero sum game. wealth creates more wealth"
|
As far as the mysticism of economics go, I can but offer my opinion:
Wealth is indeed a zero sum game. Wealth also creates more wealth. For the wealthy, that is. Because if wealth did generate wealth for the poor as well, the defining value of the currency wealth is measured against, would drop - thereby reducing the value of what currency the previously poor had back to what it was, in other words, back to square one.
If we take a universal measurement to measure wealth against, it would become more obvious. Let's stick to my carwash analogy. (It could be a hamburger, a can of Coke, a loaf of bread - the story stay the same)
There's a poor guy. He's got a hundred bucks to his name.
There's a rich guy. He's got a million.
The rich guy wants a clean car.
The poor guy is willing to wash it for five bucks.
The value of the transaction, i.e. five bucks fro a clean car, is worthwile to both parties involved. For such a menial task, the millionaire will pay five bucks, 'cause it won't make a dent in is wallet.
The poor guy is willing to wash the car, because to him it's a fair percentage of his worth. It's worth it to break your back for such hard work.
Now, give the poor guy a million.
He won't be willing to do such hard work for such low pay anymore, because five bucks isn't enough. The percentage of work done to net worth is simply too low. He will be willing to do it for $50,000, though.
The rich guy won't pay $50,000 for a carwash, though, because compared to his net worth, the percentage is simply too high.
So now either a carwash goes for $50,000, or we all drive with dirty cars.
Hence inflation.
If that happens, it means the actual value of the rich guy's net worth has come down considerably, because compared to the price of a carwash, his net worth is percentage-wise not so hot.
In other words, for the rich guy to be rich and to stay rich, the poor guy simply
must stay poor.
This is not to say that the poor guy will stay poor forever, and this is simply the only saving grace of Capitalism - he's got the opportunity to become rich. But here's the catch: The poor guy can only become rich by being replaced with
another poor guy. So, I'm not saying that Capitalism
leads to poverty, as stated in a previous post, all I'm saying is that poverty is a
requirement for wealth. And Capitalism necessarily perpetuates existing poverty. Changing that situation and completely getting rid of poverty should cause terminal inflation.