Negligent Homicide Hurricane Katrina

[stanleyg]

Q Stanley, why do you define Hurricane Katrina as negligent homicide?

Negligent homicide is the only accurate definition that describes the rescue and recovery operation of FEMA in Hurricane Katrina aftermath phenomenon. Our government is suppressing the news media et al. from informing the general public to avoid criminal investigation of our elected civil servants et al. Instead, it has supplanted the false and misleading exculpatory phrase of lesson to be learned to cover up its atrocity. If the rescue and recovery of September 11, 2001 didn't teach FEMA a lesson, then nothing will. The only lesson that American voters can learn is that our Truth Commission is NOT being truthful.

Our executive government has farmed out the legal enforcement of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to the bar association of lawyers. Our poor American citizens of New Orleans et al. were deprived equality of treatment for civil services during the period of a dire crisis. The end product has led to the infamous fiasco in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. The billions of dollars collected or earmarked for the victims have been abused or wasted. Yet, our Inspector Generals, for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al., has yet to file any criminal charges to prosecute the complaints of the displaced victims and/or family members. The red ink for the poor lower-class sacrificial lamb of New Orleans' et al. is greater than the middle class workers of Enron. They lost all that they had plus, suffered human casualties.

See Stanley's FAQ

[Zythryn]

Just as an opening question:

You mention FEMA only? Why not the state and local governments as well? And how about the bus drivers, they could have rushed out, stolen the buses the drove and evacuated many more people? Are they not also as guilty as FEMA?

[Boerseun]

The moment you call yourself a "Christian" reporter, you remove yourself from the realm of objectivity.

Stan, buddy, this newfangled Q&A-style postings of yours are dumb to the extreme. It doesn't invite any discussion. This isn't how we do things here.

Come on, dude. Time's a wastin'.

[CraigD]

Originally Posted by Boerseun

Stan, buddy, this newfangled Q&A-style postings of yours are dumb to the extreme. It doesn't invite any discussion. This isn't how we do things here.

I’m willing to give a trial to a novel posting style like Stanleyg’s Q&As, and am rather impressed by the care and labor he’s put into his latest posts. Stan appears to me “fringy” in the extreme, but also sincere, hardworking, and compassionate, which by my ethical code entitles him to some slack (tolerance) – though not immunity from plumbing the depths of negative rep.